Author Topic: Schulz to Port  (Read 56348 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Schulz to Port
« on: October 06, 2009, 07:45:57 PM »
According to 3aw

 :pray

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2009, 07:51:41 PM »
yay

Raines, Schultz, next McMahon pls

 :cheers

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2009, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if it will be for a pick or for Mitch Thorp oops Farmer?
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2009, 07:59:08 PM »
Thorp isn't at Port.  ???

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2009, 08:05:41 PM »
Thorp isn't at Port.  ???

oops a typo - I meant Mitch Farmer
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2009, 08:08:49 PM »
Would rather a 4th round draft pick  :-\

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2009, 08:12:00 PM »
Would rather a 4th round draft pick  :-\

Why?  Port's 4th round pick is 56.  That's a bit late imo.  Port's 3rd rounder (40) and Farmer for Schulz and our 5th rounder (67) sounds more reasonable, given that Farmer has next to no currency and isn't contracted like Schulz.

Would leave us with 3, 19, 35, 40, 44, 51

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2009, 08:18:48 PM »
Would rather a 4th round draft pick  :-\

Why? 

Cause i dont even know who this Farmer dude is. Would rather give a Gilligan or Connors type a go.

Ports 2nd rounder for our 4th rounder + Schultz would be a dream

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2009, 08:22:17 PM »
Would rather a 4th round draft pick  :-\

Why? 

Cause i dont even know who this Farmer dude is. Would rather give a Gilligan or Connors type a go.

Ports 2nd rounder for our 4th rounder + Schultz would be a dream
So you make judgement based on that.  This is exactly how JON got recruited.

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2009, 09:50:40 PM »
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Offline the_boy_jake

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2009, 09:58:12 PM »
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Good news but for what? 4th rounder?

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2009, 10:00:42 PM »
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Good news but for what? 4th rounder?

I will find out

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2009, 10:02:37 PM »
Mitch Farmer  swap

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2009, 10:03:28 PM »
Depends what the deal is. Lets hope its for a pick under 50. Lets hope we havent downgraded pick 19. There are rumours we may have downgraded our 2nd rounder.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2009, 10:04:48 PM »
Mitch Farmer  swap

seems a bit lite on for me, dont we get a pick in the 60s as well. Farmer is a needs type player for us, but lets be honest he hasnt done much in footy, irrespective of the potential he showed a couple years back.