« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22   Go Down

Author Topic: Schulz to Port  (Read 56375 times)

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #30 on: October 06, 2009, 11:42:53 PM »
Quote from: Ramps on October 06, 2009, 11:40:30 PM
Quote from: torch on October 06, 2009, 11:00:14 PM
take a draft pick.

mates who played with Farmer said he hasn't got the right attitude, to small, fact!

however, i think if it is a straight swap or Jay Schulz, it isn't that bad getting a small back/forward pocket player aged 20-21 years old.

but ... we don't need another small player!

 :)

a couple of our current smaller players arent up to it and none of them can control opposition small forwards. farmer has to be given a chance.


fully agree  ;)
Logged

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2009, 12:59:37 AM »
Right decision to move Jay on. Shame he never lived up to early hopes.
Be interesting to see how he goes at Port.
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2009, 01:02:39 AM »
Quote from: daniel161 on October 06, 2009, 10:06:25 PM
Quote from: Jackstar is back on October 06, 2009, 09:50:40 PM
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Jack you better not be kidding pal im about to pop open a bottle of Moet.

This is fantastic news for the club and i couldnt care less about the pick, thats just a bonus.

So now you are happy to take crappy recycled players from other teams instead of draft picks to "re-build" UNREAL!!
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #33 on: October 07, 2009, 01:04:45 AM »
Quote from: Tuckerbag on October 06, 2009, 10:53:26 PM
Quote from: CUB on October 06, 2009, 10:49:29 PM
20 Yr old still unknown for a 24 Yr old proven failure  :thumbsup
To upgrade the pick aswell, I may buy a tatts ticket.

Fantastic result if true. Please don't let this be a mirage in the desert. :pray

So now you are happy to take crappy recycled players from other teams instead of draft picks to "re-build" UNREAL!! Don't bank on the pick being upgraded. Better off with Schulz.
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #34 on: October 07, 2009, 01:06:53 AM »
Quote from: WA Tiger on October 07, 2009, 01:02:39 AM
So now you are happy to take crappy recycled players from other teams instead of draft picks to "re-build" UNREAL!!

Fair point.

Schulz has been a failure at Richmond but Farmer's done nothing for Port either.
I would have preferred a pick for Jay if it was possible.
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #35 on: October 07, 2009, 01:10:37 AM »
Quote from: Mr Magic on October 07, 2009, 01:06:53 AM
Quote from: WA Tiger on October 07, 2009, 01:02:39 AM
So now you are happy to take crappy recycled players from other teams instead of draft picks to "re-build" UNREAL!!

Fair point.

Schulz has been a failure at Richmond but Farmer's done nothing for Port either.
I would have preferred a pick for Jay if it was possible.

I just wish some people would stick to their guns regarding swapping players for players or picks for players or what the hell ever, not meaning you MM.  :thumbsup
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #36 on: October 07, 2009, 02:31:22 AM »
I couldn't find this on the net so I scanned it in.....


Port deal now up to Schulz
By Jon Ralph
Herald-Sun | Wed 07 Oct 2009, Page 76

MUCH-maligned Richmond tall Jay Schulz is set to find a new home at Port Adelaide, two years after a deal for the first-round pick fell through.

Schulz, 24, has struggled with form and consistency in seven years at Richmond.

Should he agree to a deal, the Tigers will receive Mitch Farmer, a pacy half-back flanker-midfielder from the Calder Cannons, who has struggled with injury.

At 20, he has played three senior games.

Schulz, contracted for next year, was to be traded to Port Adelaide two seasons ago for a second-round selection but the deal fell through.

The former No. 12 pick has played 71 games.

There has been no interest in Shane Tuck, and with the son of AFL legend Michael contracted, the club might have to keep him next year.

Richmond has already received a third-round pick for Andrew Raines.
Logged

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #37 on: October 07, 2009, 05:56:08 AM »
Quote from: daniel161 on October 06, 2009, 10:06:25 PM
Quote from: Jackstar is back on October 06, 2009, 09:50:40 PM
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Jack you better not be kidding pal im about to pop open a bottle of Moet.

This is fantastic news for the club and i couldnt care less about the pick, thats just a bonus.

Daniel, I dont am not into kidding
Logged

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #38 on: October 07, 2009, 07:22:42 AM »
Can't believe he's still only 24 - been around for decades it seems
Sounds like the deal is a lose-lose for both parties
Logged

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #39 on: October 07, 2009, 07:43:44 AM »
Another stupid trade
Logged
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #40 on: October 07, 2009, 07:44:08 AM »
Quote from: WA Tiger on October 07, 2009, 01:02:39 AM
Quote from: daniel161 on October 06, 2009, 10:06:25 PM
Quote from: Jackstar is back on October 06, 2009, 09:50:40 PM
Can tell you  all,get the champagne out.
DEAL CONFIRMED ! :cheers

Jack you better not be kidding pal im about to pop open a bottle of Moet.

This is fantastic news for the club and i couldnt care less about the pick, thats just a bonus.

So now you are happy to take crappy recycled players from other teams instead of draft picks to "re-build" UNREAL!!

your 100% right!!

just because im happy to see Schulz go doesn't mean im happy we may have this bloke Farmer at our club

Mitch farmer what do we know about him.

We know he is really skinny, hardly tall, we know he hardly played a game and we know Choco doesn't rate him.

what does that mean??

probably another list clogger but if it means Schulz is delisted and we upgrade a pick then i can live with it i guess
Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #41 on: October 07, 2009, 07:46:28 AM »
fair dinkum  :lol swapped Shulzs for another undersized player   :banghead is this club for real
It just keeps getting bad for the supporters.
Now we got a complete match for Nahas & Kingy  :rollin
Logged

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #42 on: October 07, 2009, 08:00:27 AM »
Mitch Farmer >>>> Pick 80+ Port would offer for Schulz>>>>Jay Schulz 

Simple as that.

Mitch is also more of a footballers size.  180cms and 82 kgs, compared to Jake (174, 74) and Nahas (176, 67).

Probably our best chance to be a back pocket player that doesn't get rag dolled by small forwards.   :help
Logged
EAT EM ALIVE!

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #43 on: October 07, 2009, 08:04:28 AM »
Quote from: tigersalive on October 07, 2009, 08:00:27 AM
Mitch Farmer >>>> Pick 80+ Port would offer for Schulz>>>>Jay Schulz 

Simple as that.

Mitch is also more of a footballers size.  180cms and 82 kgs, compared to Jake (174, 74) and Nahas (176, 67).

Probably our best chance to be a back pocket player that doesn't get rag dolled by small forwards.   :help

I agree with this
Logged

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #44 on: October 07, 2009, 08:08:02 AM »
Quote from: tigersalive on October 07, 2009, 08:00:27 AM
Mitch Farmer >>>> Pick 80+ Port would offer for Schulz>>>>Jay Schulz 

Simple as that.

Mitch is also more of a footballers size.  180cms and 82 kgs, compared to Jake (174, 74) and Nahas (176, 67).

Probably our best chance to be a back pocket player that doesn't get rag dolled by small forwards.   :help

has Port been using anabolic steroids on thier players cause the Mitch l know was not near 82kg
infact he was around 76-77 kg & his played 3 games for memory
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 22   Go Up
« previous next »