Author Topic: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights  (Read 4024 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100087
    • One-Eyed Richmond
2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« on: December 15, 2009, 03:23:56 PM »
Richmond 2010

Ages (games played)

31: Cousins (253), Simmonds (190)
-----------------------------
28: Tuck (110)
27: Newman (154)
26: McMahon (148 ), King (41), Moore (65)
25: Polak# (108 )
24: Foley (84), Roberts# (-)
23: Jackson (69), Polo (52), Thomson (30), Thursfield (53), McGuane (54), Morton (50), Tambling (95)
------------------------------
22: Deledio (106), Graham (18 ), White (54), Nahas (19), Webberley (-)
21: Hislop (19), Collins (10), Connors (10), Edwards (47), Riewoldt (46), Gourdis# (-), O'Reilly# (-)
20: Post (7), Rance (15), Farmer (3), Nason (-)
19: Cotchin (25), Vickery (9), Browne (1), Astbury (-), Gilligan# (-)
18: Martin (-), Griffiths (-), Dea (-), Taylor (-), Grimes (-), Hicks# (-), Contin# (-), Westhoff# (-)

Oldies: 2
Prime: 15
Youth: 29


Heights (cm)

Rucks (4):     Browne (205), Graham (200), Vickery (200), Simmonds (197)

Big Talls (6):   Griffiths (199), Westhoff# (197), Astbury (195), Post (194), Gourdis# (194), Polak# (194)

Talls (6):        Grimes (193), Rance (192), Riewoldt (192), McGuane (191), Thursfield (191), Moore (189)

Tall-mids (8 ):   Deledio (189), Tuck (189), Taylor (189), Jackson (187), Polo (187), Martin (187), McMahon (186), Dea (186)

Midsize-mids (10):   Cotchin (185), Hislop (185), Morton (185), Collins (184), Connors (184), Thomson (184), Newman (183), O'Reilly# (183), Webberley (181), Contin# (181)

Small-mids (12):     Edwards (180), Farmer (180), Tambling (180), Cousins (179), White (179), Nason (179), Foley (177), Gilligan# (177), Nahas (176), Hicks# (176), Roberts# (176), King (174)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2009, 03:28:23 PM »
Pity Polak & McMahon are still on the list.

Would prefer another two 18 year olds.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59274
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2009, 06:31:40 PM »
Just 10 players over 23 and two of those are mature age rookies. Most likey 5 of those will be gone this time next year. We surely now must have the youngest list in the AFL with 35 players 23 y.o. and under  :o. Another draft to fill in the final gaps (another gun mid and another ruck at least) and one final cleanout next year and we should have a young core to take us forward for the next decade. Up now to Hardwick and co. to develop them into a top team.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2009, 07:11:18 PM »
Id prefer another key forward myself next year. Jack Darling if he grows could be an interesting selection. Its looking likely that he would be the no 1 but if we end up with pick 4 ... who knows, pick 4 + mcguane to gold coast may land a higher pick.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59274
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2009, 07:50:27 PM »
Id prefer another key forward myself next year. Jack Darling if he grows could be an interesting selection. Its looking likely that he would be the no 1 but if we end up with pick 4 ... who knows, pick 4 + mcguane to gold coast may land a higher pick.
I wouldn't mind another KF either to add depth but moving forward we should be able to make a forward line out of Jack, Griffs and Postie as far as talls. My thoughts on aiming for another gun mid come from adding to our top midfield tier - Lids, Cotch and Martin. Wth four gun mids our second and third tiers of mids can then come from the rest - Foley, Blingers, Collo, Jacko and still unknowns in the likes of Connors who could anything or nothing. Our midfield depth is still ordinary and Cuz only has a year or two left in him.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2009, 09:30:00 PM »
With Hardwick making the statement he has with the delistings this year, if were

Hislop
Gourdis
Graham
White
Polo
Thomson
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck or
Simmonds

I reckon youd need a big year to get another contract.

Another 11 changes end of 2010 is it possible?

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2009, 10:17:12 PM »
With Hardwick making the statement he has with the delistings this year, if were

Hislop
Gourdis
Graham
White
Polo
Thomson
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck or
Simmonds

I reckon youd need a big year to get another contract.

Another 11 changes end of 2010 is it possible?

Highlighted players will go alright this year IMO.  Tuck moved forward a lot more often.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59274
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2009, 11:31:33 PM »
With Hardwick making the statement he has with the delistings this year, if were

Hislop
Gourdis
Graham
White
Polo
Thomson
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck or
Simmonds

I reckon youd need a big year to get another contract.

Another 11 changes end of 2010 is it possible?
Two of the above are rookies so they aren't on the senior list and would be replace by rookies. So that leaves 9 senior listed players. Add a couple of rookie promotions like this year could knock it down to 7.
Trade week could knock it down to 6. The PSD is one of the six so that's 5 National draft picks. So yep it's possible to make another 11 changes next year.

There is pressure is not only on all those 11 names but most of our 2009 survivors. Only a few had decent years. Of those 11 names I wouldn't be writing Gus off just yet despite a poor finish to the season. He did improve otherwise and rucks take longer.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5367
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2009, 12:01:22 AM »
With Hardwick making the statement he has with the delistings this year, if were

Hislop
Gourdis
Graham
White
Polo
Thomson
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck or
Simmonds

I reckon youd need a big year to get another contract.

Another 11 changes end of 2010 is it possible?

ROFL!

quick to make the changes to 2011 Ramps.

keep in mind we will only have about 3-5 Draft picks next year thanks to the Gold Coast!

11 possible changes could lead to recycled players which IMO would be horrible!

however, i do share your opinion!

Hislop
Gourdis - Wait
Graham - Wait
White - Keep
Polo - Wait
Thomson - Wait
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck - Wait
Simmonds - Last Season
Cousins - Lasst Season

6 players i have not on the 2011 list!

 :)




Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2009, 09:09:28 PM »
Why would it be Cousins last season?

he could have another 2-3 in him.

He will be better in 2010 than he was in 2009.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2009, 12:11:53 AM »
He will be better in 2010 than he was in 2009.

No he won't. He'll still be a solid contributor but his best is behind him.

We need others to step up than hope Cousins will relive his glory days.

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2009, 12:40:19 AM »
With Hardwick making the statement he has with the delistings this year, if were

Hislop
Gourdis
Graham
White
Polo
Thomson
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck or
Simmonds

I reckon youd need a big year to get another contract.

Another 11 changes end of 2010 is it possible?

ROFL!

quick to make the changes to 2011 Ramps.

keep in mind we will only have about 3-5 Draft picks next year thanks to the Gold Coast!

11 possible changes could lead to recycled players which IMO would be horrible!

however, i do share your opinion!

Hislop
Gourdis - Wait
Graham - Wait
White - Keep
Polo - Wait
Thomson - Wait
Polak
McMahon
King
Tuck - Wait
Simmonds - Last Season
Cousins - Lasst Season

6 players i have not on the 2011 list!

 :)





just making sure that the site continues to tick over.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14213
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2009, 08:39:39 AM »
He will be better in 2010 than he was in 2009.

No he won't. He'll still be a solid contributor but his best is behind him.

We need others to step up than hope Cousins will relive his glory days.

great post and very true.

we need to find our own cousins and our own Richo. I for one is rapt Richo didnt play on. This is our future now instead of relying on the champions that are Cuz and Richo.


Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

1965

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #13 on: December 19, 2009, 08:42:47 AM »
He will be better in 2010 than he was in 2009.

No he won't. He'll still be a solid contributor but his best is behind him.

We need others to step up than hope Cousins will relive his glory days.

great post and very true.

we need to find our own cousins and our own Richo. I for one is rapt Richo didnt play on. This is our future now instead of relying on the champions that are Cuz and Richo.




 :wallywink

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: 2010 Final Playing List - Age and Heights
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2009, 09:01:33 AM »
He will be better in 2010 than he was in 2009.

No he won't. He'll still be a solid contributor but his best is behind him.

We need others to step up than hope Cousins will relive his glory days.

I do not agree.

Cousins had been playing full time football since he was 16/17 years of age. A full year out of the game at 28 is not a bad thing for his body.

Last season he had injuries. He he has a proper pre-season injury free and can play 22 games I think chances are his football can be better next season than it was last season.