Author Topic: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains  (Read 4419 times)

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
It's not too hard to notice several players have bulked up a bit over the preseason. Looking at todays player list in the Herald Sun, I see the most improvement coming in defence with bulkier and taller(than old records suggest) players such as Post(195cm, 94kg), Thursfield and Mcguane(192cm, 90kg), Farmer(181cm, 80kg) and Edwards(182cm, 79kg) with Gourdis and Rance(194cm, 94kg) waiting for their chance. Reiwoldt(195cm, 93kg) is looking better up forward too and will be joined sometime this season by Astbury(195cm, 86kg) and Griffiths(198cm, 97kg) who probably look bigger than their weight suggests.  8)
« Last Edit: March 19, 2010, 04:08:24 AM by one-eyed »

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5370
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2010, 01:57:59 PM »
it would be interesting to see 2009 player's height and weight and 2010 player's heaight and weight.

 :)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2010, 02:51:25 PM »
Always a fine line with weight I believe between being too small and easily out muscled around the contest but quick and elusive and being too big and lose pace and endurance but can push others players aside. We definitely sit in the overly small bracket at the moment but players like Lids and Martin could easily get too big (like Lids did when he was lined up by Wallace to be a forward and then made to play mid where he couldn't compete properly because he lost his pace).

I think our bookends needs a huge amount of size but our midfield just needs the strength and size to not be pushed out of a contest such as what has been happening over the last few years. Tuck is a great size for an inside midfielder but lacks the pace (among other things) to spread and carry.

Horses for courses as they say but for such a long time, many of our players (and the coaches who are positioning them) never know exactly what spots different players will line up in from week to week. Makes it hard on everyone.

In general though, I am very pleased all the players are increasing in muscle and core strength. It will be a long time before I need to worry about players getting too big I'd imagine!  :D

Stripes

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2010, 03:30:24 PM »
Also interesting noticing Jack Riewoldt's size - 195cm makes him taller than Nick and at 93 kgs almost as heavy (with a few years body growth/development/maturity to come), yet many would have you believe he is too short or light to play CHF!

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2010, 04:35:07 PM »
McGuane and Thursfield didn't seem to have a problem adding 4-5kgs this pre season, seems to lend weight to the argument they were held at a lower weight by the previous coaching staff who wanted agile catlike defenders. Will be most interested to see how the added weight translates to onfield performance. Another 4-5kgs and they are acceptable KPD size

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2010, 07:56:43 PM »
Also interesting noticing Jack Riewoldt's size - 195cm makes him taller than Nick and at 93 kgs almost as heavy (with a few years body growth/development/maturity to come), yet many would have you believe he is too short or light to play CHF!

Yep certainly puts that argument to rest. Well big enough.

Post is a great size too. Finally getting some big lads into the club.

Online one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100507
    • One-Eyed Richmond
2010 Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2010, 09:39:20 PM »
From today's Herald-Sun 2010 AFL Magazine compared to the height/weight stats from the Round 1 AFL Record last year.

No. Name  Height (gain/loss) Weight (gain/loss)

1.
2. Thursty    192 (+1) 89 (+4)
3. Lids         188        88
4.
5. Simmo     197       100 (+1)
6. Polak       193 (-1)  93 (-1)
7.
8. Riewoldt   195 (+2) 93 (+6)
9. Cotchin     185        85 (+1)
10. Edwards  182 (+2) 79 (+3)
11.
12.
13. Jordy      186        80
14. Polo       187        84 (+1)
15. Farmer    181        80
16. McGuane 192 (+1) 90 (+4)
17. Newy      183        84 (+3)
18. Rance     194 (+1) 92 (+2)
19. Connors  186 (+2) 83 (+1)
20. Morton    186        86 (+6)
21. Tuck       189        90
22. Gilligan   177        72     
23. Jacko      188        92 (+2)
24. Collins    187 (+1) 80 (+2)
25. Graham   201      106 (+6)
26. Nahas     176        72 (+5)
27. Hislop     185        85
28. King        178       80 (+2)
29. Vickery    200        91 (+2)
30. Tambo    179 (-1)  79 (-2)
31. Thomson 185 (+1) 84
32. Cousins   179        78
33. Gourdis   193        93 (+4)
34. Browne   203 (-2) 104 (-1)
35. White     180 (+1) 80 (-1)
36. Martin     187        86
37. Post       195 (+1) 94 (+6)
38. Griffiths  198        97
39. Astbury   195        86
40. Moore     190        86 (+2) 
41. Foley      178        80
42. O'Reilly   185        80
43. Dea        186        83
44. Taylor     189        77
45. Hicks      176        70
46. Webbs    182        75
47. Nason     179        75
48. Grimes    193        83
49. Contin     183        83
50. Roberts   176        77
51. Westhoff 197        81

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: 2010 Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2010, 09:58:20 PM »
Polak,Tambling and Browne all shrunk in height?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: 2010 Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2010, 10:18:30 PM »
EL OH EL at contracting players, must be lifting some heavy weights on the shoulder press haha  :thumbsup
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2010 Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2010, 12:33:21 AM »
Polak,Tambling and Browne all shrunk in height?
They stood on their tippy-toes when measured last year  ;)

Not sure how accurate these tables are but good to see Jack and Postie putting on 6kgs. Not sure though why Blingers would need to lose 2kgs.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • In Absentia
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2010, 09:47:52 AM »
I hope that's right about Jack putting on 2cm.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2010, 11:00:08 AM »
I hope that's right about Jack putting on 2cm.

i doubt he is 195cm, wasnt richo 195/6???. i doubt jack is 2 cm shorter than snake

impressed with morton, u cansee he has put on 6kgs, he has bulked up
 post putting on weight is gr8 to see also

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2010, 11:13:51 AM »
i doubt he is 195cm, wasnt richo 195/6???. i doubt jack is 2 cm shorter than snake

what's their to doubt  8)
Why couldn't Reiwoldt be 195cm lol

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2010, 11:41:56 AM »
I hope that's right about Jack putting on 2cm.

i doubt he is 195cm, wasnt richo 195/6???. i doubt jack is 2 cm shorter than snake

impressed with morton, u cansee he has put on 6kgs, he has bulked up
 post putting on weight is gr8 to see also


Richo was 197cm, the same as Simmonds.  Riewoldt was listed as 193cm last year so 2cm growth in a 21 year old is not unreasonable or unexpected I would think.  Not saying 195cm is correct, just that it's quite reasonable.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2010: Bigger and Stronger / List of Richmond Height and Weight gains
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2010, 03:07:04 PM »
A difference of 2cm is pretty possible if someone has gained significant muscle mass. Simply improved posture could account for the 2cm, which at the end of the day, isn't much.