Author Topic: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?  (Read 2799 times)

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2010, 02:46:54 PM »
On paper we look great, experience wise we are still a long way behind :( there are plenty of teams way ahead of us in that department.......

Online Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2010, 06:29:56 PM »
You are in a rush Stripes.....no Judd in the Carlton midfield.

These midfields were from the first game last year when Judd was suspended. We still got our behinds handed to us but with Thompson, underdone Cotchin and an extremely raw Nason and Martin we were bound to get smashed.

Experience wise we are still a ways off but in terms of quality I'm starting to get a little warm and fuzzy when I look at our midfield stocks. Foley would be a huge bonus for us this year.

We played both Deledio and Connors in the middle in the first game but they seem to have settled in the HB line now. While the half back and half forward players often push up into the middle, this does take away a little from the rotations.

If you have to pick 12 players to rotate through the middle in a game who would you put and in what order of importance?

Mine would be -
1. Cotchin (leader, quality, in and out)
2. Jackson (crucial to structures/blocks/tags)
3. Martin (quality/in & out)
4. Foley (quality/in and out)
5.Tuck (size/inside)
6. Edwards (pace/outside)
7. Morton (desposal/outside)
8. Grigg (inside & outside/ may lift up rankings but untried at present)
9. Houli (outside/ goalkicker/ may lift up rankings but untried at present)
10. Deledio (quality ball user/little time in middle reason for low ranking)
11. Connors (quality ball user/little time in middle reason for low ranking)
12. King (additional tagger/goal sneak)

Just my take

Stripes




Offline tigerfan1961

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2010, 07:39:42 PM »
Cotchin, Martin, Deledio, Foley, Caddy  8)
That is what I am hoping for- another tough inside midfielder. Geez our midfield will be good in a few years time

Online Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2010, 09:44:17 AM »
Cotchin, Martin, Deledio, Foley, Caddy  8)
That is what I am hoping for- another tough inside midfielder. Geez our midfield will be good in a few years time

I don't think you would want too many of the same type of player in the team. I think we traded for Grigg to be that extra inside midfielder so we don't necessarily need another inside midfielder in this draft.

I'll have to look up Caddy to see who you are talking about though and I agree with you - our midfield is starting to shape up nicely  :thumbsup

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2010, 02:14:03 PM »
in my humble view I think that most other team's midfields are better than ours - at least all the teams that played in the finals and possibly a few more such as the kangaroos and melbourne

they generally have more depth and have matchwinners in the midfield - IMHO we dont have any pure A grade elite midfielders at the moment
hence why none of our mids get into a Sheahan top 50 for example

cotchin (fingers crossed) with a proper preseason and only slightly modified program has the talent to turn into a pure A grade elite midfielder , but he is not there yet.  foley was one and it remains to be seen what he comes back from the injury like, martin is only in his second year and would probably need at least another year to become that A grader,
edwards (break out season) tuck jackson kingy morton etc are all solid foot soldiers but not elite...morton might turn himself into an elite but has only really played a handful of games in the centre after moving away from the fwd line...

note that I dont view lids as a mid - hbf.

Online Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2010, 04:58:40 PM »
in my humble view I think that most other team's midfields are better than ours - at least all the teams that played in the finals and possibly a few more such as the kangaroos and melbourne

they generally have more depth and have matchwinners in the midfield - IMHO we dont have any pure A grade elite midfielders at the moment
hence why none of our mids get into a Sheahan top 50 for example

cotchin (fingers crossed) with a proper preseason and only slightly modified program has the talent to turn into a pure A grade elite midfielder , but he is not there yet.  foley was one and it remains to be seen what he comes back from the injury like, martin is only in his second year and would probably need at least another year to become that A grader,
edwards (break out season) tuck jackson kingy morton etc are all solid foot soldiers but not elite...morton might turn himself into an elite but has only really played a handful of games in the centre after moving away from the fwd line...

note that I dont view lids as a mid - hbf.

You view Connors and Newman in the same manner as Lids as well? What about our new midfielders in Grigg and, probably, Houli?

I think we will surprize many people next year with out midfield talent. We were winning the contested ball and clearances in many games last year but were one of the worst in turnovers. My biggest concern with our midfield is not our depth as I believe that is coming on like a steam train but more our ruckmen who feed the ball out to them. Gus is servicable and Vickery versitile neither are big enough or capable enough at the moment to give us regular first use of the ball. We are continually reliant upon predicting where the opposition ruck will hit it to and winning the ball in congested situations. This is one of our achille's heels.

Lids was being tagged last year for a reason. Teams don't tag anyone if they don't think they need to and Cotch can be extremely damaging to oppositions. Martin was winning a hell of a lot of congested ball for his first year and players like Grigg and Foley (hopefully) will only add to the congested football numbers. Cotchin, Martin and our other better ball users will then be released more to move it forwards. Obtaining Grigg and the return of Foley could make a far greater difference to our midfield and team than many people predict.

The midfield is probably the area we have as our greatest strength and it is through no coincidence that it is also the area we have the greatest competition for spots and greatest depth. Our backline is the next area with the greatest depth so be assured it will become our next most powerful area.

I feel there is alot of upside to our team next year and I can't see many midfields in the competition destroying us through the middle as in previous years. I think at the very worst we will break even and very best embarrass a great deal of teams.

Time will tell of course  :santa

Stripes

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2010, 05:21:44 PM »
Stripes

I do view connors and newman in the same boat as Lids...

I admire your optimism regarding our midfield but I still argue we dont have any genuine A grade elite players there at the moment.

We simply do not have an Ablett (GC), Montagna (Saints), Swan (Pies), Cooney (Doggies), Judd (Blues), Bartel (Cats)  at all on our list.  I raise these 6 as they are 6 matchwinners at other clubs...and aside from GC who only has Rischitelli and then some great kids - the other teams mentioned have either another A grader or at least some very strong Bplus mids to assist eg hayes is either an A grader or an A minus, Pend is probably an A grader, boyd an A grader, Selwood at the cats is an A grader etc.

Put another way, we do not have ONE  midfieder who is a regular matchwinner in his own right, let alone a couple.  I dont count Lids a mid and when he played in the middle - he was tagged and found it hard to shake.

As for Grigg I think he will be serviceable without being A grade...he isnt yet but he might surprise and turn out to be a solid B grade mid.  Same for Houli, though I think he will be a C to B grader.  I think Grigg will be the pick of the 2.

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2010, 06:02:27 PM »
Stripes

I do view connors and newman in the same boat as Lids...

I admire your optimism regarding our midfield but I still argue we dont have any genuine A grade elite players there at the moment.

We simply do not have an Ablett (GC), Montagna (Saints), Swan (Pies), Cooney (Doggies), Judd (Blues), Bartel (Cats)  at all on our list.  I raise these 6 as they are 6 matchwinners at other clubs...and aside from GC who only has Rischitelli and then some great kids - the other teams mentioned have either another A grader or at least some very strong Bplus mids to assist eg hayes is either an A grader or an A minus, Pend is probably an A grader, boyd an A grader, Selwood at the cats is an A grader etc.

Put another way, we do not have ONE  midfieder who is a regular matchwinner in his own right, let alone a couple.  I dont count Lids a mid and when he played in the middle - he was tagged and found it hard to shake.

As for Grigg I think he will be serviceable without being A grade...he isnt yet but he might surprise and turn out to be a solid B grade mid.  Same for Houli, though I think he will be a C to B grader.  I think Grigg will be the pick of the 2.

But it isn't necessarily about having a few A+ graders, its more about not having any B- and C graders.  Champions are nice but not necessary to win flags, an even spread of good to very good players will do.  And when you have a list of good to very good players the very good have life a lot easier and can look like superstars.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2010, 07:08:00 PM »
Stripes

I do view connors and newman in the same boat as Lids...

I admire your optimism regarding our midfield but I still argue we dont have any genuine A grade elite players there at the moment.

We simply do not have an Ablett (GC), Montagna (Saints), Swan (Pies), Cooney (Doggies), Judd (Blues), Bartel (Cats)  at all on our list.  I raise these 6 as they are 6 matchwinners at other clubs...and aside from GC who only has Rischitelli and then some great kids - the other teams mentioned have either another A grader or at least some very strong Bplus mids to assist eg hayes is either an A grader or an A minus, Pend is probably an A grader, boyd an A grader, Selwood at the cats is an A grader etc.

Put another way, we do not have ONE  midfieder who is a regular matchwinner in his own right, let alone a couple.  I dont count Lids a mid and when he played in the middle - he was tagged and found it hard to shake.

As for Grigg I think he will be serviceable without being A grade...he isnt yet but he might surprise and turn out to be a solid B grade mid.  Same for Houli, though I think he will be a C to B grader.  I think Grigg will be the pick of the 2.

But it isn't necessarily about having a few A+ graders, its more about not having any B- and C graders.  Champions are nice but not necessary to win flags, an even spread of good to very good players will do.  And when you have a list of good to very good players the very good have life a lot easier and can look like superstars.


yep unfortunately we have neither at thispoint in time....
2011 will tell a tale about both our potential elite and also our perceived growing depth..... but right now we have nothing but hope.

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2010, 07:18:18 PM »
But it isn't necessarily about having a few A+ graders, its more about not having any B- and C graders.  Champions are nice but not necessary to win flags, an even spread of good to very good players will do.  And when you have a list of good to very good players the very good have life a lot easier and can look like superstars.


I understand your point about very good players looking like superstars cos of others around them...eg Kerr when he had judd and cuz next to him.

but how many premiership teams of the past 20 years did not have at least a couple of A graders in the midfield?

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #25 on: November 03, 2010, 09:09:33 PM »
But it isn't necessarily about having a few A+ graders, its more about not having any B- and C graders.  Champions are nice but not necessary to win flags, an even spread of good to very good players will do.  And when you have a list of good to very good players the very good have life a lot easier and can look like superstars.


I understand your point about very good players looking like superstars cos of others around them...eg Kerr when he had judd and cuz next to him.

but how many premiership teams of the past 20 years did not have at least a couple of A graders in the midfield?

Hawthorn 2008-
Mitchell B+ or A-
Crawford B (was an A grader but not in his last year)
Sewell B+
Bateman B+
Ladson C+ or B-
Lewis B+
Young B-
Ellis C+ or B-

Just my opinion, thoughts?

Online Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2010, 01:14:36 PM »
I don't think we are there yet but the quality of the midfielders developing in this area should give us all great optomism about the future. Next year we could see the emergence of not only one potential A graders but a number. Very few clubs have players as young as we do holding up the centre, not just hovering around the clearances or taking the glory on the wings, but genuine young players winning the clearances and working together to thread through traffic and then deep into the forwardline. This job is usually allocated to older, more experienced campaigners such as the players you ahave already mentioned but we have the likes of Cotchin and Martin doing the bulk of it. With Grigg joining the young brigade next year (22 yr old) this makes for a very inexperienced but potentially elite midfield emergence in the next 2-4 years.

I see in 2011 our midfield holding their own, learning each others game and developing the strategies/structures around the packs to exploit their individual talents for the next decade. Foley and Houli will be the icing on the cake with Tuck and Jackson providing some much needed strength; blocks and shepherds, around the packs in the short term. Throw in a good outside wingman with out first pick and it has me salivating.  :burgereater

IMHO next year will reveal the start of a powerful midfield unit that will embarrass many teams in the future.  :thumbsup

Stripes

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2010, 04:37:24 PM »
I don't think we are there yet but the quality of the midfielders developing in this area should give us all great optomism about the future. Next year we could see the emergence of not only one potential A graders but a number. Very few clubs have players as young as we do holding up the centre, not just hovering around the clearances or taking the glory on the wings, but genuine young players winning the clearances and working together to thread through traffic and then deep into the forwardline. This job is usually allocated to older, more experienced campaigners such as the players you ahave already mentioned but we have the likes of Cotchin and Martin doing the bulk of it. With Grigg joining the young brigade next year (22 yr old) this makes for a very inexperienced but potentially elite midfield emergence in the next 2-4 years.

I see in 2011 our midfield holding their own, learning each others game and developing the strategies/structures around the packs to exploit their individual talents for the next decade. Foley and Houli will be the icing on the cake with Tuck and Jackson providing some much needed strength; blocks and shepherds, around the packs in the short term. Throw in a good outside wingman with out first pick and it has me salivating.  :burgereater

IMHO next year will reveal the start of a powerful midfield unit that will embarrass many teams in the future.  :thumbsup

Stripes

Great post Stripes...I agree our mids are some of the youngest and we have true hope for optimism.  I think it will be 2012 and not 2011 unfortuantely.
If it werent for the GC concessions this year we would be getting another elite mid at #2.  I hope foley returns to the form he had earlier in his careet and that you are right about Houli...as I said earlier, I think that Grigg will be the pick of the 2.

Most players (bling and post being the exceptions (i dont count mcmahon)) all went forward in their development last year.  Another year's development like that and our mids and in fact our whole team will be a competitive unit.  somewhere between 9th and 12th on the ladder.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #28 on: November 09, 2010, 04:06:53 PM »
tier 1
Tuck. Newman. Foley. Martin. Cotchin. Deledio.

2
Morton. Edwards. Connors. Jackson. King.

3
white. Grigg. Houli. Orielly. Webberly. Taylor. Farmer. Contin. Dea. Hicks. Hislop. Nahas. Nason

You are in a rush Stripes.....no Judd in the Carlton midfield.

These midfields were from the first game last year when Judd was suspended. We still got our behinds handed to us but with Thompson, underdone Cotchin and an extremely raw Nason and Martin we were bound to get smashed.

Experience wise we are still a ways off but in terms of quality I'm starting to get a little warm and fuzzy when I look at our midfield stocks. Foley would be a huge bonus for us this year.

We played both Deledio and Connors in the middle in the first game but they seem to have settled in the HB line now. While the half back and half forward players often push up into the middle, this does take away a little from the rotations.

If you have to pick 12 players to rotate through the middle in a game who would you put and in what order of importance?

Mine would be -
1. Cotchin (leader, quality, in and out)
2. Jackson (crucial to structures/blocks/tags)
3. Martin (quality/in & out)
4. Foley (quality/in and out)
5.Tuck (size/inside)
6. Edwards (pace/outside)
7. Morton (desposal/outside)
8. Grigg (inside & outside/ may lift up rankings but untried at present)
9. Houli (outside/ goalkicker/ may lift up rankings but untried at present)
10. Deledio (quality ball user/little time in middle reason for low ranking)
11. Connors (quality ball user/little time in middle reason for low ranking)
12. King (additional tagger/goal sneak)

Just my take

Stripes





Online Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Which teams have a better midfield than ours in 2011?
« Reply #29 on: November 09, 2010, 09:36:02 PM »
tier 1
Tuck. Newman. Foley. Martin. Cotchin. Deledio.
2
Morton. Edwards. Connors. Jackson. King.
3
white. Grigg. Houli. Orielly. Webberly. Taylor. Farmer. Contin. Dea. Hicks. Hislop. Nahas. Nason

Would you put Newman, Connors and Deledio into the midfield bracket? They played off the half backline all year afterall but I guess in that position they are constantly moving up the ground... :-\ King has played more in the forwardline lately but, like the other three, is frequently moving into the midfield so perhaps your a summary is fairly spot on.

I would suggest that jackson should be int he first tier given his importance to the midfield structure. He does a huge amount of work off the ball which allows the better users of the ball the space and time to use it.

Grigg and Houli could quickly fit into the 2nd or even :pray first tier if things fall our way. Looking at our second and third tier we fall away very quickly. If Morton, Edwards and one of White, Webberly, Contin or Hicks can step up next year it would make all the difference. Our new lot of midfielders may also burst out of the blocks... but there is a lot of 'if's' there isn't there  :'(

I guess we just have to hope for more players to lift, develop and strengthen like we have for years. Despite all this I still remain optimistic about this years midfields performance - we will trouble most teams but we can't afford injuries.

Stripes