Author Topic: It's not looking good for ...?  (Read 3572 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59222
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
It's not looking good for ...?
« on: June 17, 2011, 05:55:19 AM »
Just looking at who needs a massive turnaround to impress the coaches in these last 10 or so weeks to remain at Tigerland.

Tucky, Whitey and Goo don't appear to be in Dimma's plans for 2012. The first two are in and out of the side despite now being experienced players and Goo is continually overlooked at Coburg. Mind you based on our OER contracts list they are all contracted for another year  :P.

Westhoff and Hicks as 2nd year rookies you would think are unlikely to be at Punt Rd next year as they haven't progressed out of the Coburg ressies.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8400
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2011, 07:16:15 AM »
Morton looks in trouble despite his issues
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2011, 10:18:24 AM »
Tuck
Moore
Thursfield
Graham
Morton
Connors
Gourdis
Taylor
Hicks
Westhoff
Hislop
Miller
McGuane
Post
White
Nason
Webberley
Browne
Contin
Jackson
Edwards
Farmer

All either closing in on the edge, on the edge, over the edge or already a corpse rotting at the bottom of a cliff.
Can't see anyone outside that list getting the ass this year. Everyone from Miller up is in real kaka.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4852
  • Beaver BLT
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2011, 10:50:38 AM »
Tuck
Moore
Thursfield
Graham
Morton
Connors
Gourdis
Taylor
Hicks
Westhoff
Hislop
Miller
McGuane
Post
White
Nason
Webberley
Browne
Contin
Jackson
Edwards
Farmer

All either closing in on the edge, on the edge, over the edge or already a corpse rotting at the bottom of a cliff.
Can't see anyone outside that list getting the ass this year. Everyone from Miller up is in real kaka.

I recon Edwards is safe and Farmer is the teachers pet but your right about the rest ;) ;)

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2011, 10:52:06 AM »
Tuck
Moore
Thursfield
Graham
Morton
Connors
Gourdis
Taylor
Hicks
Westhoff
Hislop
Miller
McGuane
Post
White
Nason
Webberley
Browne
Contin
Jackson
Edwards
Farmer

All either closing in on the edge, on the edge, over the edge or already a corpse rotting at the bottom of a cliff.
Can't see anyone outside that list getting the ass this year. Everyone from Miller up is in real kaka.
Spot on, I would exclude only Edwards and Jackson from your list, shocking how long it is.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2011, 11:02:31 AM »
Edwards is safe but that list shows just how far we have to go.

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2011, 11:42:02 AM »
Tuck
Moore
Thursfield
Graham
Morton
Connors
Gourdis
Taylor
Hicks
Westhoff
Hislop
Miller
McGuane
Post
White
Nason
Webberley
Browne
Contin
Jackson
Edwards
Farmer

All either closing in on the edge, on the edge, over the edge or already a corpse rotting at the bottom of a cliff.
Can't see anyone outside that list getting the ass this year. Everyone from Miller up is in real kaka.

Good list, Gerks. And people think you are just a mere chicken spanker.  ???

Jackson has to the one to trade I reckon.

Our mid-field has gone past him and he would have some value to a team like GWS or GOld Coast as a much better, younger version of a Danile Harris type.

Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 99901
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2011, 11:57:35 AM »
Here's what we have as our Contracts List:

2011: Astbury, Browne, Dea, Farmer, Grimes, Griffiths, Jackson, King, Morton, Nahas, Nason, Newman, Rance, Taylor, Thursfield, Webberley

2012: Batchelor, Connors, Deledio, Derickx, Edwards, Foley, Gourdis, Graham, Helbig, Houli, MacDonald, McGuane, Moore, Post, Tuck, Vickery, White

2013: Conca, Cotchin, Grigg, Martin, Riewoldt

Rookies: 
Jamie O'Reilly (international rookie - signed until end of 2011)
Robert Hicks (2nd year rookie)
Pat Contin (2nd year rookie)
Nick Westhoff (2nd year rookie)
Ben Jakobi (1st year rookie)
Brad Miller (mature rookie - 1st year)
Tom Hislop (1st year as a rookie)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2011, 12:18:11 PM »
Good list, Gerks. And people think you are just a mere chicken spanker.  ???

Jackson has to the one to trade I reckon.

Our mid-field has gone past him and he would have some value to a team like GWS or GOld Coast as a much better, younger version of a Danile Harris type.

There's a lot more to chicken spanking than people realise. It's not for everyone, but if you are prepared to put in the effort to get good at it, the rewards and recognition are there.

I'd trade Jackson for anyone without a twitter account who can kick and run. Wouldn't be on the list if Cogga hadn't gone down on both knees like an alter boy at an Easter after-party.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2011, 12:44:13 PM »
Graham contracted for 2012. What the stuff. And Gourdis? I am a fan but how on earth could he possibly have a contract for 2012? You sure these are right?

stuffing Craig Cameron. Sack that dud and bring back Wallet as a our list manager  :lol


Online TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5841
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2011, 01:15:46 PM »
Would want to extend Deledios contract to 2013 by the end of the season. Number 1 priority.

Aswell as resigning the skipper, Griffiths, Rance, Nahas, Grimes and Astbury. till 2012 and beyond.

King to get another contract, Browne aswell.

Dea to keep persisting with maybe 1 year contract.

Jackson, Morton, Nason, Taylor, Thursfield to be shopped around.

Webberley and Farmer probably gets another year.
Go Tigers!

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14199
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2011, 01:49:26 PM »
Graham contracted for 2012. What the eff. And Gourdis? I am a fan but how on earth could he possibly have a contract for 2012? You sure these are right?

effing Craig Cameron. Sack that dud and bring back Wallet as a our list manager  :lol



would have to ask also. Are these correct? Source?

How the goo can be contracted for 2 years when he has hardly played a game is beyond me
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2011, 01:59:57 PM »


you serious CC?

Con65

  • Guest
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2011, 02:12:21 PM »
moore definately should not be on that list...they rate him as our #1 hybrid defender (plays tall and short).

take him off the list ...

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: It's not looking good for ...?
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2011, 02:16:37 PM »
take him off your own list




Edit: leave out the insult just because another poster disagrees
« Last Edit: June 17, 2011, 03:16:05 PM by one-eyed »