mcguane and goo out for post and and thursty,
conca and webberly out for king and helbig.
[/quote]
Keeping Miller in the side makes no sense if our most promising KPP is match fit and available. His development comes at the expense of Miller. Miller knows it, BG knows it, Dimma knows it and all would be okay with it. How is that chicken little or are you getting bit chicken little yourself?
[/quote]
not real sure what you are trying to say, but perhaps you have misinterpreted what i was saying.
I'm rapt to see see griffiths replace miller, but i'm glad they waited until they felt he was ready , which is why i tolerated him being in the side for the short term, unlike some.
[/quote]
I get the logic, I don't get this chicken little poo. You say you're happy to see griff in (when ready get that), You're happy enough he replaces miller (still with you at this point) but then make some obscure, smug reference to chicken littlers being kept happy for a few weeks (lost me wtf are YOU talking about)
Bizarre.
[/quote]
The chicken little comment was just a cheap snipe at those constantly calling for miller to be dropped because they cant see past the fact that ability wise he is only an average footballer and see the train of logic in playing him.
They will soon find something else to complain about.
I suppose it wasn't the best analogy in this case. perhaps narrow minded, short sighted, ignorant fools would be more accurate, but that's probably a little too insulting and probably would have led to "snip" ?
[/quote]
No we're getting somewhere! At the very least, millers place in the side is a fair topic to debate. Until a couple of weeks ago, there were arguments for & against. He is not exactly Trent Cotchin.
So to call people "narrow minded, ignorant, short sighted and foolish" for having a contrary opinion - it is after all, a forum - is at the very least narrow minded and possibly a little short sighted.