Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 126305 times)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1170 on: February 28, 2014, 12:07:29 PM »
Why do you think Foley never got a game. People need to go back & take a look at some recent replays of what he has been doing during games.
his kicking has never been good.
imo his problem is he is not winning enough inside ball anymore. it was this and his hands that greatly offset his poor foot skills.
i think we kid ourselves if we think we dont desperately need to find a better balance between inside and outside mids. tuck leaves a huge hole and even with tuck there we needed another inside mid. like tuck had to when it comes to kicking he will have to learn to operate within his limitations.

for me if foley can start winning more inside ball again hes a must player. one thing that cant be denied is injuries have not helped him with form or consistency.every time he looks like getting somewhere close to what he can do he cops another injury.

purely as a mid id have him in the team in front of the likes of
s edwards, newman, houli, grigg thomas, arnot,

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1171 on: February 28, 2014, 12:51:03 PM »
Houli is our best rebounding defender by mile, in fact he's one of the best in the business

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1172 on: February 28, 2014, 01:51:25 PM »
Houli is our best rebounding defender by mile, in fact he's one of the best in the business

x 2

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1173 on: February 28, 2014, 02:06:14 PM »
He also does an impressive windmill/cartwheel action when he gets touched by an opposition player

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1174 on: February 28, 2014, 02:09:45 PM »
Houli is our best rebounding defender by mile, in fact he's one of the best in the business

Not if Martin and / or Lids are played back

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1175 on: February 28, 2014, 02:12:13 PM »
i dont deal in ifs pal

Offline Phillip

  • The Boss
  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 80
  • "The Specialist"
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1176 on: February 28, 2014, 02:26:05 PM »
If we are to be serious here, Nathan Foley has played one very good season (2007) and one reasonably good season (2008). He has teased, been injured or just played like garbage in the rest of them. He is pushing 30. Delist at seasons end if he can't hold down a spot
I'm a Boss

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1177 on: February 28, 2014, 03:11:28 PM »
Should have been sent to the nackery 5 years ago.

HTF Did he survive ?

See Bowden era duds.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1178 on: February 28, 2014, 03:15:28 PM »
If we are to be serious here, Nathan Foley has played one very good season (2007) and one reasonably good season (2008). He has teased, been injured or just played like garbage in the rest of them. He is pushing 30. Delist at seasons end if he can't hold down a spot

Yep been saying it for years - people need to just give up and stop expecting the return of the 2007/8 model Foley - he's not coming. But then it's like trying to tell children there's no Father Christmas with some of our more delusional supporters.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1179 on: February 28, 2014, 03:53:44 PM »
He was flying in 2012 before he did his Achilles again. People forget that or just brush over it

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1180 on: February 28, 2014, 04:56:05 PM »
stop bitching about Foley u bastards, he had one calf the size of a toddlers when he came back last year, give him a friggen chance.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1181 on: February 28, 2014, 04:59:56 PM »
Indeed.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1182 on: February 28, 2014, 05:37:05 PM »
Deedless
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1183 on: February 28, 2014, 05:53:54 PM »
Capuano him if he gets injured again

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1184 on: June 14, 2014, 03:40:04 PM »
Foley doing well today!!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"