Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 145959 times)

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #945 on: April 09, 2013, 07:32:00 PM »
even if he gets fit... who soy drop for him... NO ONE.... ALL OUR CURRENT MIDS ARE BETTER... even hackson
LMAO at Hackson selling some candy against the Aints on Friday  :lol :lol :lol He couldn't tie the laces for a fit Axel though.

but dimma loves his big body in the guts

foley is a midget we have better midgets

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #946 on: April 09, 2013, 08:10:20 PM »
even if he gets fit... who soy drop for him... NO ONE.... ALL OUR CURRENT MIDS ARE BETTER... even hackson
LMAO at Hackson selling some candy against the Aints on Friday  :lol :lol :lol He couldn't tie the laces for a fit Axel though.

but dimma loves his big body in the guts

foley is a midget we have better midgets
foley is easily the best small player we have and by some margin.  he is also easily better than most of the mediums like grigg and hacksonwhats a small, lets say for arguments sake  in todays game anyone under 6ft183cm  is a small.
king nahas, edwards, ellis, houli, lonergan,mcdonough, white, arnot, its a no brainer theres foley and then theres daylight. seems to me we dont have better midgets. our other midgets are crap apart from one or two.
the bloke is easily best 22 and he is very much needed  fit and near his best.

if dimma wants a big body in the guts replace hackson with vlastuin or helbig, these two and foley need to come into the side. theres plenty of duds they can replace.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #947 on: April 09, 2013, 08:14:24 PM »
Foley was in no small way responsible for our good form early in 2012. Will come straight into the side when fit.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #948 on: April 09, 2013, 11:42:15 PM »
If Foley was fit and inform I see him being in our 2nd middle rotation and in our best half dozen 'smalls'.

A] Cotchin. Deledio. Martin (Maric)
B] Tuck. Conca. Foley (Vickery)

Whilst I agree with claws recent point I do not feel Shane Edwards stop is under jeopardy.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #949 on: April 10, 2013, 08:25:10 AM »
Foley is a gun
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100482
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #950 on: April 10, 2013, 03:46:36 PM »
Foley will play for Coburg the week after this according to Astbury.


tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #951 on: April 10, 2013, 09:02:31 PM »
Foley will play for Coburg the week after this according to Astbury.

Great news, 4-5 weeks at coburg and back as the final piece to a midfield that will take us to finals

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #952 on: April 10, 2013, 09:23:27 PM »
Foley will play for Coburg the week after this according to Astbury.

Great news, 4-5 weeks at coburg and back as the final piece to a midfield that will take us to finals

He'll be raring to go and will have a huge impact when he gets back especially to some of the boys that might start to fatigue. Will keep the midfield perked up and active and give us another dimension like last year before his injury.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #953 on: April 10, 2013, 10:40:55 PM »
ken oath TB, from the moment he went down last season we lost our edge. We'll be even better this time round with Conca and Ellis maturing and Vlas a regular by that stage

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #954 on: April 10, 2013, 10:52:47 PM »
Bring him back in for Round 8 vs Melbourne, imo.  Get some confidence back.  ;)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #955 on: April 10, 2013, 10:59:54 PM »
Bring him back in for Round 8 vs Melbourne, imo.  Get some confidence back.  ;)

Foley doesn't need to play against Melbourne to get his confidence up. Confident player. :thumbsup


Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5370
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #956 on: April 11, 2013, 12:18:27 AM »
Round 3 - Rest
Round 4 - VFL Reserves
Round 5 - VFL
Round 6 - Retain to AFL

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #957 on: April 11, 2013, 01:38:20 AM »
ken oath TB, from the moment he went down last season we lost our edge. We'll be even better this time round with Conca and Ellis maturing and Vlas a regular by that stage

ok einstein

who gets dropped to let foley in

knights is better than foley and will be in the team say for jackson or grigg
so who gets dropped for vlas??? ok say knights and vlas in, jackson an grigg out grigg due to form
so who comes out for foley
edwards no way
king no way
newman doubt it

foley needs to earn his spot and prove a he can hit targets and b his body wont break down

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3896
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #958 on: April 11, 2013, 06:37:39 AM »
Foley will play for Coburg the week after this according to Astbury.

Great news. Hope does play and gets through okay

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #959 on: April 11, 2013, 08:11:29 AM »
ken oath TB, from the moment he went down last season we lost our edge. We'll be even better this time round with Conca and Ellis maturing and Vlas a regular by that stage

ok einstein

who gets dropped to let foley in

knights is better than foley and will be in the team say for jackson or grigg
so who gets dropped for vlas??? ok say knights and vlas in, jackson an grigg out grigg due to form
so who comes out for foley
edwards no way
king no way
newman doubt it

foley needs to earn his spot and prove a he can hit targets and b his body wont break down

Remember, it's not about the best 22 we can put on the park, it's about the depth when we can't.  So whether Foley, Knights, Vlastuin et al can force their way in is not the point, the fact they might keeps the pressure on Jackson, Grigg, Ellis, King etc and covers for form drop or injuries when needed so we can keep playing to as high a standard as possible.  Hello finals contender.