« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 28   Go Down

Author Topic: Matthew Arnot [merged]  (Read 57372 times)

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #135 on: February 25, 2013, 08:59:41 AM »
I'd love to see biscuit push Hackson out, but can't see the coaches not picking him unfortunately.

Tucky will be fine this year, same old Tucky. Won't take a backwards step.  :clapping
Quote from: tigs2011 on February 24, 2013, 01:29:40 PM
Quote from: JVT on February 24, 2013, 12:43:33 PM
but Arnot should look to push in from end of 2014 and beyond.
So what your saying is we can actually develop a player in the reserves?  :o

Damn, what a luxury.
I guess that is what I am saying. I am shocked as well  :lol
Logged

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #136 on: February 25, 2013, 06:16:02 PM »
Quote from: al on February 24, 2013, 11:14:57 PM
tucky plays more inside than his old so his body takes more of a battering.
i reckon 1-2 years at the most will see him hang up his boots


Tuck is as robust as the China walls. Will kick on for.many moons.
Logged

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #137 on: February 26, 2013, 07:23:53 PM »
Matt Arnott will need to push someone out with consistant performances if he wants to play senior football!
Time will tell who that is but I woundnt want to have a couple of bad games in the seniors.
Logged

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #138 on: February 26, 2013, 07:25:53 PM »
Quote from: camboon on February 26, 2013, 07:23:53 PM
Matt Arnott will need to push someone out with consistant performances if he wants to play senior football!
Time will tell who that is but I woundnt want to have a couple of bad games in the seniors.

Agree our overall depth is looking better every year
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #139 on: March 03, 2013, 05:43:29 AM »
What did we all think of Arnot's game?

He had 14 disposals (10k, 4h), 5 marks, 2 tackles and kicked 1.2.  If he had kicked those two goals he would've been classed the hero.
Logged

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #140 on: March 03, 2013, 06:29:02 AM »
Quote from: one-eyed on March 03, 2013, 05:43:29 AM
What did we all think of Arnot's game?

He had 14 disposals (10k, 4h), 5 marks, 2 tackles and kicked 1.2.  If he had kicked those two goals he would've been classed the hero.

But he didn't so I'm still unsure about the quality if his finishing.
He is a unit though
Logged
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #141 on: March 03, 2013, 07:38:10 AM »
Concern over his kicking
Logged

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #142 on: March 03, 2013, 07:58:07 AM »
My main concern with Arnott is that it appears he thinks he can crash through all packs.AS a junior and built the way he is he might have been able to do this but he should realise quickly that at AFL level more times than not he cant
Logged

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #143 on: March 03, 2013, 08:15:52 AM »
love his effort and intensity but he can't kick . u can't kick u can't play full stop.. throw him in with rance white Jackson and mguane.. good bye .... if u repeatedly miss targets u cannot play
Logged

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #144 on: March 03, 2013, 09:03:57 AM »
Quote from: Username: on March 03, 2013, 08:15:52 AM
love his effort and intensity but he can't kick . u can't kick u can't play full stop.. throw him in with rance white Jackson and mguane.. good bye .... if u repeatedly miss targets u cannot play
Surely you can't have Rance on that list anymore?
Logged
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #145 on: March 03, 2013, 09:55:51 AM »
Has arnot trimmed down from last year?
Logged
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #146 on: March 03, 2013, 10:15:37 AM »
Arnot is an like an investment property.

Was "GOOD" yesterday playing in the midfield, head over the football at all times and tackling was good.

Apart from the behinds scored, he is a future inside midfielder that Hardwick would want.

Goal kicking will improve.
Logged

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #147 on: March 03, 2013, 10:19:40 AM »
Quote from: Mr Tigra on March 03, 2013, 09:03:57 AM
Quote from: Username: on March 03, 2013, 08:15:52 AM
love his effort and intensity but he can't kick . u can't kick u can't play full stop.. throw him in with rance white Jackson and mguane.. good bye .... if u repeatedly miss targets u cannot play
Surely you can't have Rance on that list anymore?

Judging by his post-match comments I would say Username had a hunge on Rance to top yesterday's goal kicking.  Media had Rance in our best, some even had him BOG but Username saw fit to can his effort and name Rance our worst.  I didn't watch it so have no opinion of my own but that's a wide gap in assessments!  Maybe he asked Rance for an autograph and got knocked back?
Logged

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8095
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #148 on: March 03, 2013, 10:32:13 AM »
I think Rance took 10 marks and 6 were intercepts - basically saving us scores or inside 50s from Bombres.
Would've thought this stat alone kept us in the game during that 3rd qtr and therefore puts him in our best
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Matthew Arnot [merged]
« Reply #149 on: March 03, 2013, 10:45:45 AM »
Quote from: Mr Tigra on March 03, 2013, 09:03:57 AM
Quote from: Username: on March 03, 2013, 08:15:52 AM
love his effort and intensity but he can't kick . u can't kick u can't play full stop.. throw him in with rance white Jackson and mguane.. good bye .... if u repeatedly miss targets u cannot play
Surely you can't have Rance on that list anymore?

rance missed many targets and turned the ball over all day again, and repeatedly runs in circles sideways and gets himself in all bother,,,, costs us too many goals

now the question is to all of you

DO YOU WANT TO WIN A PREMIERSHIP OR NOT

IF THE ANSWER IS YES THEN WE CANNOT WIN ONE WITH PLAYERS LIKE RANCE THAT ARE SO IFFY WITH THEIR SKILLS ESPECIALLY UNDER PRESSURE


TOO MANY OF YOU ARE HAPPY WITH MEDIOCRITY
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 28   Go Up
« previous next »