« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)  (Read 4237 times)

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2012, 10:59:33 AM »
Putting aside the Essendon bias in the results prediction I think that is generally a fair assessment of things.

There are a few I strongly disagree with, Beefcake, Tuck, Moore, Webberley and Grimes spring to mind but I don't mind most of the others.
Logged
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2012, 12:23:34 PM »
Quote from: tigerfan1961 on February 12, 2012, 08:22:17 AM
Quote from: Mrakov on February 12, 2012, 05:22:50 AM
lol what a moron. no 'winnable games' against Essendon I see. They think their so much better than us its not funny.. I hope we beat them both times so that the bloke who wrote that can have a massive sook.

Funny how he doesnt rate Nahas, King or Grimes and he says that hes glad Houli is not on their list lol. Also says we would be kicking ourselves that we didnt take Heppel.

I sure hope Conca has a break out year and Heppel struggles.

They overate themselves sooooo much!

Absolutely hate that poohole of an arrogant club.
Same here Mate- Their arrogance has to be seen to be believed, and the severe overating of Hurley and Heppell is really starting to grate on me. Yes they are good footballers, but they are Carey and Hird reincarnated according to most of their supporters.

Essendon and Carlton are the two sides we must beat, and would be the wins that give me the most satisfaction. How good did it feel after last years Dreamtime game!!

Yes it felt awesome and I was there with a bomber supporting mate who had to down about 15 frothies after the game to drown his sorrows!
Logged
Quote from: the claw on December 10, 2013, 11:44:23 PM
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
Quote from: the claw on January 09, 2014, 09:00:49 PM
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5004
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #32 on: February 12, 2012, 12:53:56 PM »
The second assessment is better than the first, but both are shizen as far as im concerned.
in other news, eff the bummers and their woofter fans. We will wipe them like a dirty behind this year.
heck, they have Angus Monfries and Kyle Reimers in their starting line-up! Nuff said.
Logged

Offline smasha

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #33 on: February 12, 2012, 02:42:53 PM »
Blummers32 LAUGHABLE review.

Grimes- not a fan.

Yeah because he carved your lot up in the Dreamtime game.

What a load of garbage and illustrates why I don't like Essendon much.

Arrogant Veruca Salt organisation.
Logged

Offline smasha

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #34 on: February 12, 2012, 02:45:55 PM »
Brad Miller - they should have found a replacement by now which they have.


 :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin
Logged

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #35 on: February 12, 2012, 02:59:18 PM »
Quote from: smasha on February 12, 2012, 02:42:53 PM
Blummers32 LAUGHABLE review.

Grimes- not a fan.

Yeah because he carved your lot up in the Dreamtime game.

What a load of garbage and illustrates why I don't like Essendon much.

Arrogant Veruca Salt organisation.

Their fans are setting themselves up for a very painful and damaging period for the club should they fail to make the eight. Can't wait!
Logged

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #36 on: February 12, 2012, 03:39:42 PM »
This was on BF.

I think it sums up an Essendum supporter perfectly.

Hird says: something improbable that no sensible person would accept.

Essendon flogs lap it up again.
Logged
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9376
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #37 on: February 12, 2012, 04:08:39 PM »
Quote from: wayne on February 12, 2012, 03:39:42 PM
This was on BF.

I think it sums up an Essendum supporter perfectly.

Hird says: something improbable that no sensible person would accept.

Essendon flogs lap it up again.
that's because they don't accept mediocrity and they demand success. They are a successful team like we used to be. We as supporters were the same then but alot changed from then till now.
I hope we are like that again. Feared and fearless demanding excellence in everything.
I truly hope things have changed for us.
We will see round 1.
 :gotigers
Eat 'em Alive.
Logged
The club that keeps giving.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #38 on: February 12, 2012, 05:39:24 PM »
Kicking myself we didn't take Heppell... Just what we needed, another back flanker. Spewing we didn't invest in Longer either... The fact that he was gone before our first pick is beside the point  ::) ::) :rollin
Logged

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #39 on: February 12, 2012, 05:44:03 PM »
Quote from: dwaino on February 12, 2012, 05:39:24 PM
Kicking myself we didn't take Heppell... Just what we needed, another back flanker. Spewing we didn't invest in Longer either... The fact that he was gone before our first pick is beside the point  ::) ::) :rollin

Essendon would have gotten him, they would have traded their pick 19 and a dud and upgraded to pick 8. Isn't that how it's meant to work?
Logged
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Richmond 2012 preview (from the red and dark side)
« Reply #40 on: February 12, 2012, 05:58:07 PM »
Quote from: wayne on February 12, 2012, 05:44:03 PM
Quote from: dwaino on February 12, 2012, 05:39:24 PM
Kicking myself we didn't take Heppell... Just what we needed, another back flanker. Spewing we didn't invest in Longer either... The fact that he was gone before our first pick is beside the point  ::) ::) :rollin

Essendon would have gotten him, they would have traded their pick 19 and a dud and upgraded to pick 8. Isn't that how it's meant to work?


Essendon don't have duds. Didn't you get the memo? Destined for a top 4 finish whoa  :shh

:p
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »