Author Topic: Conca cops a 3 week suspension [updated]  (Read 14508 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #60 on: February 19, 2012, 07:23:29 PM »
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

I think the rule is a good and fair one WAT.  If you can be suspended playing in them, then it's only right that you should serve your time in them.

I think of much greater concern is the way that the whole football media world has weighed in and stamped him as guilty and heavily suspended before he has even had a chance to defend himself.  You would think the poor bugger smashed Adams face apart with a brick the way they have all become self-righteous experts.

I am not talking about he rule Smokey, yeah it's great, pity it wasn't in last year or we would have King back but FFS when is our game going to be left alone?

The rules for behind the ball incidents has changed and we will be the first to cop the brunt of it thanks to the press. We were also the first club to cop the change in the draft rules when we didn't get the prioriy pick and we copped the rule when the draft rules changed again, we finished bottom and the team, I think the Dees got first pick.

Leave th game alone is all I am saying.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #61 on: February 19, 2012, 07:26:04 PM »
nah carlton pumped us
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58594
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #62 on: February 19, 2012, 07:54:59 PM »
Unsocialable footy has come to Tigerland. Not necessarily a bad thing but the cubs just need to be smarter when to dish it out. As much as it shouldn't be a 4-5 week suspension and the length of the suspension will be part of the AFL continually trying to take the bump out of the game, Conca was dumb to do it so far off the ball knowing the new 'intentional when off the ball' interpretation and with fox footy showing off all its different camera angles on the first night of its new coverage. The AFL will make an example of him and we'll just have to cop it  :P.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #63 on: February 19, 2012, 08:06:45 PM »
So if he gets 4 weeks do live NAB cup games count?
Go Tigers!

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #64 on: February 19, 2012, 08:17:04 PM »
So if he gets 4 weeks do live NAB cup games count?

That will depend on the MRP and how it issues the penalty

Adams said there was nothing in it

But unfortunately, because of the footage available it looks terrible and with the change in the rule regaridng how "behind the play incidnets" are going to graded I reckon he is on trouble

4 weeks but with an early plea and good record he'll get 3 and thet should take it.

So much for Eddie's rantings about Fox camera's will pick up everything. Hmmm in this case I ask what were the other camera's doing  ;D
« Last Edit: February 20, 2012, 06:57:09 AM by WilliamPowell »
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #65 on: February 19, 2012, 10:02:29 PM »
God I just can't keep track of these rules, honestly, now NAB games are treated as live......

Good for Conca but ffs leave the bloody rules alone. :banghead

"yeah sorry gerks"  ::)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Tiger becomes first to benefit from new suspension law (Australian)
« Reply #66 on: February 20, 2012, 05:19:31 AM »
Tiger becomes first to benefit from new suspension law

    by: Greg Denham
    From: The Australian
    February 20, 2012


RICHMOND defender Reece Conca will be the first beneficiary of a significant rule change set to reduce the suspension time of players during the AFL premiership season.

The league has altered its rules relating to when a player can serve his suspension. And for the first time, a suspension incurred in the pre-season competition can be served in pre-season matches.

Under previous rules, players suspended in the pre-season had to serve their time from the start of the premiership season. Last year North Melbourne's Drew Petrie, and Carlton's Michael Jamison (two games) and David Ellard all missed the start of the season proper after being suspended during the pre-season.

AFL general manager of football operations, Adrian Anderson, confirmed yesterday the rule change also applies for the eight practice games in the final weekend of the pre-season series, and the NAB Cup grand final.

"NAB Cup suspensions can be served in the NAB Cup, including the final round which determines placings and prizemoney," Anderson said.

The AFL pays prizemoney down to eighth. The winner of the NAB Cup grand final receives $198,000, while the runner-up collects $132,000. Third- and fourth-placed clubs receive $88,000, with fifth to eighth collecting $44,000.

Conca, 19, will today be cited by the match review panel after umpires lodged a notice of investigation following an incident involving North Melbourne's Leigh Adams in the first NAB Cup match of the year on Friday night at Etihad Stadium.

Adams was substituted off the field following a heavy collision off-the-ball with Conca, who appeared to contact the Kangaroos player with his shoulder.

Goal-to-goal television footage shows Conca pause in front of a running Adams before blocking the seemingly unsuspecting North Melbourne player, which left him staggering and dazed before he was attended to for several minutes while lying on the turf.

Whether the panel assess the incident as striking or rough conduct, the outcome for Conca is likely to be a three-game ban.

But with the Tigers to play a further three pre-season matches, their tough half-back could still be eligible to play against Carlton at the MCG in the opening round.

Under new tribunal guidelines introduced last year for the classification of a striking offence, striking behind the play or off the ball or during a break in play or with a raised forearm or elbow, is usually conclusive that the strike is intentional.

That change was implemented after the match review panel was deemed to have been too lenient with the two-match penalty given to the Gold Coast's Campbell Brown for his off-the-ball strike on then Western Bulldogs player Callan Ward in round three last season when his conduct was assessed as reckless.

Conca, who is ineligible for a good behaviour discount as he is entering only his second season, could attract an initial 425 demerit points if impact is assessed as high.

The Tigers are already without forward Jake King against the Blues following his two-game ban for rough conduct in round 23 last year.

Richmond coach Damien Hardwick rated Conca's performance on Friday night as one of his club's positives.

"I thought Reece showed a fair bit, he took another step forward," Hardwick said, adding he was also pleased with former Adelaide ruckman Ivan Maric. "The depth of our list is certainly improving."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/tiger-becomes-first-to-benefit-from-new-suspension-law/story-e6frg7mf-1226275200518

Online Muscles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #67 on: February 20, 2012, 08:02:51 AM »
I went to watch the Giants v Skunks v Bullies on Saturday night.  What a clash of the Bogans that was.  I saw two similar incidents, same distance off the ball, only without the head clash.  Players getting into position for a switch from the wing, across the ground into the forward 50,  bumping their taggers and putting them on their backsides.  I had the pleasure of having to sit with a group of about 30 junior-ish umpires.  None of them commented when I pointed out the off-the-ball clashes.

 

Vale the bump!

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #68 on: February 20, 2012, 10:22:53 AM »
Mick Molloy to Eddie on MMM this morning: "you carried on about having all these cameras, but you had to get this footage from NASA."  :lol

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #69 on: February 20, 2012, 10:42:29 AM »
Mick Molloy to Eddie on MMM this morning: "you carried on about having all these cameras, but you had to get this footage from NASA."  :lol

 :rollin The sad fact is though, Eddie would foot the bill no matter the cost if it meant sourcing evidence against any non Collingwood player.  :banghead

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #70 on: February 20, 2012, 10:54:02 AM »
So if he goes for 1-3 he will be eligible for round 1 and if he goes for more than 3 he will miss out?

He will go for 4+ because its Richmond.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #71 on: February 20, 2012, 12:54:03 PM »
There is only two games left unless we make the Nob cup final isn't there? 3 games would mean missing the Blues?


Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Conca - in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #72 on: February 20, 2012, 01:33:27 PM »
Robbo and harf are just about to discuss this on SEN 1116
If someone wants to call out Robbo on his comments the other night, here's the chance..
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Conca gets 3 weeks
« Reply #73 on: February 20, 2012, 03:03:14 PM »
Just on SEN:

Conca has copped a 3 week suspension.

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Conca gets 3 weeks
« Reply #74 on: February 20, 2012, 03:06:05 PM »
Just on SEN:

Conca has copped a 3 week suspension.
Is that 3 with an early guilty plea?  :banghead