Author Topic: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?  (Read 2783 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98400
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2012, 05:00:45 AM »
Vicks goals was against Nahas. illegal hold
Vickery's disallowed goal was for holding by nahas when he shepherded, and was probably a correct call
Cheers Coach and al. I wasn't sure what the free was for as the scoreboard at the ground made an effort to replay how many steps Vickery took.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2012, 07:07:00 AM »
Why didn't the video get used on the Yarran one?

Always thinking TBR, good call  :thumbsup
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2012, 02:02:47 PM »
Gieschen did say there was no problem with that decision. ::)
Clearly the AFL umpires boss is as blind as the umpires. ::)

seriously,we should all put in and have this cockroach bashed to within an inch of his life-for football fans everywhere

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2012, 04:59:51 PM »
umpires always have and always will screw us


Enough with the excuses, guy.

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Did we cop the rough end of two doubtful goal decisions?
« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2012, 07:15:50 PM »
umpires always have and always will screw us


Enough with the excuses, guy.

Hey guy, who are you calling guy, guy? You got that, guy?