Author Topic: Damning statistics  (Read 2396 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Damning statistics
« Reply #15 on: April 12, 2012, 10:20:38 PM »
after 2 rounds stats dont tell a real lot, particularly those stats coming against more mature bodied and experienced midfield.

they'd be even worse without big ivans input.

speaking of which, i saw somewhere we were ranked 2nd (in a good way) for hit outs to advantage against, but again 2 rounds doesnt give a great insight.

True, but if you were a coach you'd be wanting to nip this in the bud pretty quick before it became a trend

probably more damning than overall numbers is the large differential in contested possessions and clearances between us and the opposition in our first 2 games.

In dimmas first year we matched most sides in these 2 stats, even when getting beaten easily. where we got smashed was in the uncontested disposals.

last year we greatly improved our uncontested but dropped right off in contested, and it seems that trend  is continuing
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Damning statistics
« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2012, 05:27:03 PM »
LOL I know turn it up, we played two stuffing games and both were pretty tough games.  Not crying into my beer yet.  If we get flogged by Melbourne, then I will cut up nasty.

x 2

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Damning statistics
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2012, 11:54:32 PM »
LOL I know turn it up, we played two stuffing games and both were pretty tough games.  Not crying into my beer yet.  If we get flogged by Melbourne, then I will cut up nasty.

x 2

Ditto :thumbsup