Author Topic: Richmond V Port rnd 6  (Read 23513 times)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #255 on: May 06, 2012, 10:30:46 PM »
Titch was good when he came on.

Oh yeah, magnificent.. :whistle

yeah really turned the game on its head with his pin point kicks and handballs.

really thought it was his breakout game today   :)



:lol

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #256 on: May 06, 2012, 10:32:01 PM »
Titch was good when he came on.

Oh yeah, magnificent.. :whistle

Port's last goal of the match was thanks to a turnover by Shane who ignored option 1,2 and 3 and lairised only to kick the ball meekly to the opposition which started the chain of events that led to Port's goal on the siren.

Moral to the story, whether Edwards plays 20 minutes or 120 minutes the errors in his game still stand out like a sore thumb.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #257 on: May 06, 2012, 10:36:06 PM »
Good win in those conditions, Tuck was awesome again  :thumbsup

Your boy Butcher got a bath today. Almost as much value as Griffiths IMHO.

Butcher is the next Kosi. Watts is even better.

Taking into account your differences with Monk, Butcher was awful today but the footy Butcher played in the last couple of games last year Princess Jacqueline has not been able to string together in four years at Melbourne. At least Butcher's psyche isn't shot at this stage as is Princess Jacqueline's. :lol :rollin :lol

By the way I'm with you Tony I thought Jack was awful today bar the last quarter. Took a few contested marks and looked dangerous in the last quarter. There has not been a game this year when he hasn't given away a free for trying to take make of the year. At least in the last quarter after Dimma took a few of our leaders aside at 3 quarter time Jack at least looked like a forward playing decent footy.
Butcher holding Jack Watts  ;D   (a bit of help for Finey tonight on SEN)

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #258 on: May 06, 2012, 10:36:34 PM »
Titch was good when he came on.

Oh yeah, magnificent.. :whistle

Port's last goal of the match was thanks to a turnover by Shane who ignored option 1,2 and 3 and lairised only to kick the ball meekly to the opposition which started the chain of events that led to Port's goal on the siren.

Moral to the story, whether Edwards plays 20 minutes or 120 minutes the errors in his game still stand out like a sore thumb.

Spot on TB, spot on.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #259 on: May 06, 2012, 10:49:14 PM »
Bugger about the goal to them after the siren.

Final Score.

Richmond   3.2    8.7    9.10   13.13-91
Port Adel.   1.2    2.2     6.4     8.6-54

Goals: Riewoldt 4, Nahas 3, King 2, Miller, Deledio, Newman, Conca.


One decent qtr got us the win.
Considering we won 3 quaters , thtas a bit harsh MT !!!
No doubt taz if you gave me us winning 3 quarters on the scoreboard and a 37 point win at the start of the day I would've taken it so as the old saying goes a win is a win. Having said that, I was judging our performance on quality and my comment was based on us only playing one quarter that was top 4 standard. The other 3 were ordinary especially that rubbish 3rd qtr. The irony of today is we played far worse than the previous two weeks yet we won comfortably in the end.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #260 on: May 06, 2012, 10:51:48 PM »
Tricky conditions, away from home, been up for a few weeks yet did it easy

Just enjoy it

Our season starts this week  ;D

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4802
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #261 on: May 07, 2012, 01:47:08 AM »
When you are 1-4 any win is a good win.
Not often we have a game "in the bag" at half time.
Unleash the tornado

Offline HKTiger

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #262 on: May 07, 2012, 03:06:30 AM »
Titch was good when he came on.

Oh yeah, magnificent.. :whistle

Port's last goal of the match was thanks to a turnover by Shane who ignored option 1,2 and 3 and lairised only to kick the ball meekly to the opposition which started the chain of events that led to Port's goal on the siren.

Moral to the story, whether Edwards plays 20 minutes or 120 minutes the errors in his game still stand out like a sore thumb.

How about some facts.  The options were behind him so either poor voices or Shed needs eyes in the back of his head.  The pressure causes a partial smother.  The following play ends in a Boak point.  A point, not a goal. From the kick out, Batch drops a mark and the Houli punches the arms and gives away a free kick.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond

Online eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #264 on: May 07, 2012, 06:32:44 AM »
Fell alseep in the third quarter. Could have won by a significantly larger margin. A must win but not the greatest of wins. Sometimes you have to grind out results

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #265 on: May 07, 2012, 07:16:22 AM »
Titch was good when he came on.

Oh yeah, magnificent.. :whistle

Port's last goal of the match was thanks to a turnover by Shane who ignored option 1,2 and 3 and lairised only to kick the ball meekly to the opposition which started the chain of events that led to Port's goal on the siren.

Moral to the story, whether Edwards plays 20 minutes or 120 minutes the errors in his game still stand out like a sore thumb.

Spot on TB, spot on.
:fishing
Like taking candy off a baby....

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #266 on: May 07, 2012, 08:41:00 AM »
i think the third quatrer was down to a combinationof things. Mainly that port lifted their work rate and intensity whil we played like it was simply going to be a continuation of the second quarter.

In the third port gave us very little time and space and continually got numbers to the contest, something vital in any game of footy, let alone one played in those conditions.

I also thought that we looked a little flat right from the start of the game,so to come away with a 6 goal win was a good result.

dont you just love the way one bloke gets singled out for one poor kick on a day that saw so many, as well as lots of fumbles and dropped marked?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #267 on: May 07, 2012, 08:55:58 AM »
thats not the point Al. He has been given ample opportunities over the last 6 years to string together half a dozen good solid games and has not.

He is a midfielder/HB Flanker is he not?

He plays the majority of games/minutes does he not?(not yesterday)

He fails time and time again to do something, anything given the minutes he spends on the ground does he not?

Im annoyed why? because we should be getting valuable minutes into players like Elton  and not persisting with time wasters like Edwards who rarely find the pill

Edwards should make way for Elton and Mcguane for Vickery. If we cop 1 or 2 injuries we are screwed so we dont blood any new players. Im glad we are letting Dea settle in the team. We need to know if they can play

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #268 on: May 07, 2012, 10:06:29 AM »
dont you just love the way one bloke gets singled out for one poor kick on a day that saw so many, as well as lots of fumbles and dropped marked?
Thats what happens when Pettifer, McMahon, Wallace, Hyde etc. get delisted.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Richmond V Port rnd 6
« Reply #269 on: May 07, 2012, 12:59:14 PM »
dont you just love the way one bloke gets singled out for one poor kick on a day that saw so many, as well as lots of fumbles and dropped marked?
Thats what happens when Pettifer, McMahon, Wallace, Hyde etc. get delisted.

no this isnt about anyone else on the list. Nor is this is about him yesterday. This is about him since the first day he has arrived at the club.

He was great a few years back in the last half dozen games of the year and everyone hoped he would go on, but he hasn't.

His spot on the list IMO is an absolute waste. Much better served getting game time into Elton and others.

IMO he seems a very timid footballer who seems afraid to hit the packs and the man
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.