Author Topic: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10  (Read 7647 times)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #30 on: June 01, 2012, 11:11:27 AM »
In: Batchelor

Out: Dea (injured - leg)

EFA
disagree with this. keep playing the kids dimma hes done a reasonable job. why not drop one of the real hacks dimma. nahas has been deplorable and where is that mantra on kicking. how many goals has having no left side at all cost us so far and for that matter being poor on his right. cmon dimma blind fred can see hes not afl quality. you managed to gift griffiths a game and look how it turned out surely you can gift another you never know mate who ever it is may just use the ball a bit better than nahas and hurt the opposition or god forbid in vickerys case actually get his hands on the ball.
how did vickery keep his spot dimma you like statues or something. 7 in a row and counting.

Can't be seven in a row Claw missed round 6 and 7.
he played 7 and all 7 hes been in the worst players quite easily. played 7 worst in 7 to me thats 7 in a row.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #31 on: June 01, 2012, 11:22:25 AM »
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #32 on: June 01, 2012, 11:50:12 AM »
Just finished watching the replay twice. Couple of our goals against the Hawks came from Vickery-contested centre bounces, tapped it straight down the throat of our midfielders on more than one occasion for a clean take away and goal. FACT.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #33 on: June 01, 2012, 12:30:04 PM »
The only Fact that is becoming clear out of all this is Claw has NFI :lol And his spelling and punctuation is worse than mine ;D

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #34 on: June 01, 2012, 12:43:12 PM »
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.

The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either  :banghead

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5640
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #35 on: June 01, 2012, 01:07:43 PM »
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.

The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either  :banghead

I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.

 :lol
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #36 on: June 01, 2012, 01:14:28 PM »
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.

The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either  :banghead

I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.

 :lol

Then why does he bother posting? I got te feeling all Claws posts are directed at Dooks :huh

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5640
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #37 on: June 01, 2012, 01:17:44 PM »
Yet he expects us to read his posts for Geez's sake.

The occasional correct use of grammar wouldn't effing hurt either  :banghead

I'm sure claw couldn't give a stuff if you read his posts or not.

 :lol

Then why does he bother posting? I got te feeling all Claws posts are directed at Dooks :huh

Same thing probably applies to you too.

 :lol
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #38 on: June 01, 2012, 02:47:50 PM »
Next stop Hollywood?  :lol

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #39 on: June 01, 2012, 03:34:15 PM »
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
no he wasnt good against wce he was ordinary. at the least he got a few touches but some of his efforts were a disgrace. he was among our worst again in that game.

where the hell is the bar set with some. bloody low imo. he went from to deplorable to just plain poor and thats good enough.

his best effort in the ruck was this week against hawthorn with a whopping 11 hit outs. roughead their forward ruckman had 13 hitouts 17 possesions 3 tackles 2 goals and richmond people bagged that effort.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #40 on: June 01, 2012, 03:52:57 PM »
He kicked 2.2 and took a few brilliant marks. He was not among our worst, claw.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #41 on: June 01, 2012, 04:06:28 PM »
Snip  :banghead :banghead :banghead

Stick to the topic, keep the personal sniping & insults off the forum
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #42 on: June 01, 2012, 04:10:50 PM »
Thank you WP  :pray


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97882
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #43 on: June 01, 2012, 06:58:22 PM »
Mini Maric is our sub tonight.

On the bench are King, Houli and Ellis.

The sub for St Kilda is Siposs.

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Official Tiger Team -v- St Kilda Rd 10
« Reply #44 on: June 01, 2012, 07:18:12 PM »
Vickery was good against West Coast. His teammates kicked the footy to him a few times.
no he wasnt good against wce he was ordinary. at the least he got a few touches but some of his efforts were a disgrace. he was among our worst again in that game.

where the hell is the bar set with some. bloody low imo. he went from to deplorable to just plain poor and thats good enough.

his best effort in the ruck was this week against hawthorn with a whopping 11 hit outs. roughead their forward ruckman had 13 hitouts 17 possesions 3 tackles 2 goals and richmond people bagged that effort.
Roughead had a much higher % of gametime in the ruck than Vickery did.  We thrashed Hawthorn in clearances when Vickery was in the ruck against him.  For what it's worth, I thought Roughead was by far their best player as well.