Changes for the Adelaide game?

[Jackstar is back again]

We are dreaming if you think Vickery gets a game

[TigerLand]

Can't drop Griffiths against Tippet and Walker need Rance Grimes and Griffiths all playing. If they put Jenkins in the ruck and send Jacobs down back we are stuffed for height.

[blaisee]

 4 big inns against the crows.

We will have a full strength side for the first time this year

I expect us to win.

[WilliamPowell]

With Vickery it depends on whether he is fit not whether he "deserves" a game. Not sure how bad his knee is

If fit Foley & Grimes are certainties.

I'd drop Batch as his form has really dropped away over the last few weeks

Also not sure on leaving O'Hanlon in there either really struggled yesterday when he came on

At least I got a fortnight to think about it

[Jackstar is back again]

Morris .Grimes and Foley ins
45,24.7or 11 out ?

[blaisee]

foley morris vickery grimes

in for O'hanlon miller batchelor not sure on last one, but it wont be griffiths with tippett playing

[Judge Roughneck]

O miller jackson king
I foley morris grimes

Vickery -> ohanlon maybe too.

[MADTIGER2010]

In-Vickery, Foley, Grimes, Morris, Post
Out-Miller, Dea, Batchelor, Houli, O'hanlon

FB: morris rance newman
HB: grimes griffiths ellis
C: edwards cotchin conca
HF: connors vickery king
FF: post reiwoldt nahas
FOLL: maric martin deledio
INT: foley tuck grigg jackson

[1965]

In-Vickery, Foley, Grimes, Morris, Post
Out-Miller, Dea, Batchelor, Houli, O'hanlon

FB: morris rance newman
HB: grimes griffiths ellis
C: edwards cotchin conca
HF: connors vickery king
FF: post reiwolt nahas
FOLL: maric martin deledio
INT: foley tuck grigg jackson

Make five changes and we lose.

 

[MADTIGER2010]

In-Vickery, Foley, Grimes, Morris, Post
Out-Miller, Dea, Batchelor, Houli, O'hanlon

FB: morris rance newman
HB: grimes griffiths ellis
C: edwards cotchin conca
HF: connors vickery king
FF: post reiwolt nahas
FOLL: maric martin deledio
INT: foley tuck grigg jackson

Make five changes and we lose.

 

why? We'll make 3 or 4 at the very least. All for the better. But 1 more change will ruin it all?

[1965]

In-Vickery, Foley, Grimes, Morris, Post
Out-Miller, Dea, Batchelor, Houli, O'hanlon

FB: morris rance newman
HB: grimes griffiths ellis
C: edwards cotchin conca
HF: connors vickery king
FF: post reiwolt nahas
FOLL: maric martin deledio
INT: foley tuck grigg jackson

Make five changes and we lose.

 

why? We'll make 3 or 4 at the very least. All for the better. But 1 more change will ruin it all?

I'm a mathematician, the stats tells me...

Make five changes and you lose.

[Willy]

Definites:

In: Morris, Foley, Grimes, Vickery

Out: Batchelor, Ohanlon, King, Miller

[eliminator]

I agree with

Out: Miller, Dea, Batchelor, O'Hanlon
In: Grimes, Morris, Foley, Vickery

Adelaide game: Ellis the sub

[The Glove]

Definites:

In: Morris, Foley, Grimes, Vickery

Out: Batchelor, Ohanlon, King, Miller

You do know that we are 5 - 1 in wins when Kingy has played a full game this year and 1 -5 when he hasn't?

You might also not be aware that Richmond have lost 18 of the last 19 games Kingy has missed.

Jakey will be going nowhere except to AAMI.

[Eat_em_Alive]

That's a really intresting stat glove. He may not contibute volumes in terms of disposals or goals. But add that extra spark we need on field.