Are physics consistant across time/space/ dimension s but? I believe not for quantum physics for example
If you are asking if there one grand unified theory of physics then the answer is of course not yet. Quantum physics and general relativity don't yet reconcile as there is no quantum theory for the gravitational force. Einstein's theory of general relativity is a classical (non-quantum) theory. This is why things such as string theory and loop quantum gravity are looked at.
Having said that, the fact there isn't a G.U.T. of everything, doesn't provide a counter-argument to argue that there's aliens out there with superior knowledge protected or hidden by some U.S. government conspiracy.
What about black holes? Perhaps the aliens have something we are not aware of.
Unless you've watched the cult sci-fi movie 'The Black Hole' too many times, real black holes are objects with such large mass that they distort spacetime so much that not even light can escape let alone any 'aliens'.
We rrecently thought life was not possible in space. Chernobyl, under water vents etc. And have been proven wrong for example
Space is a vacuum at 3 degrees kelvin (-270 C). Good luck finding anything surviving unaided (no spacesuit) in that environment.
But there is an overwhelming amount of quotes from early generation astronaut cosmonaut presidents defensive cheifs nuclear missile dudes etc. Seeminly ingorned as its rather inconvenient
Just the kind of people you wouldn't expect to be jokers
Not to mention unlimited accounts by less creditable humans. Such as the 200 witnesses of the 1966 Clayton incident...
Some pretty decent YouTube videos.
Such as the ISS live feed being
Cut just as the UFOs rocked up ..
Stories by former presidents seeing them in jets / ww2 accounts / nuke sites being turned on / off by unknown sources
I reckon i fairly arrogant,/to dismiss the possibility due to; we couldn't understand why they would be here, or how they got here adduction people on occasion and not many them self formally known to Dwayne beyond reasonable doubt.