Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 316771 times)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1635 on: August 19, 2014, 02:34:09 PM »
10. Being a gimp

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1636 on: August 19, 2014, 02:38:51 PM »
11- Forcing Tuck into retirement when he poos on Thomas
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1637 on: August 19, 2014, 02:45:01 PM »
All means poo when in 2 weeks when we miss out on finals

Complete waste of a year and if we think finals will be a given next year with this list they should think again

I blame hardwick for screwing the year up starting with that decision to rubbing Ivan into the ground so he missed those crucial games

 :clapping
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1638 on: August 24, 2014, 08:37:42 PM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1639 on: August 24, 2014, 08:39:52 PM »
2s sucked donkeys balls.

Firsts struggles against last place

Throw the kitchen sick at clarkson

10 million buddy deal

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1640 on: August 24, 2014, 09:07:09 PM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one
What happens if we do the impossible and win Chucky? :whistle
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1641 on: August 24, 2014, 09:11:45 PM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one
What happens if we do the impossible and win Chucky? :whistle

Hmmmmm hold in abeyance to the first week of finals then I suppose

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1642 on: August 24, 2014, 09:12:13 PM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one
What happens if we do the impossible and win Chucky? :whistle

Extension

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1643 on: August 24, 2014, 11:11:56 PM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one

Don't forget the rebuild failure ones.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1644 on: August 24, 2014, 11:36:59 PM »
Yeh, look.....this is all a bit ironic in a way.

Seems to me the players were put in the unenviable position of having to confront the coach in regards to both his game plan ( was "a carbon copy of Hawks and wasn't working") and then the embarrassing public admission that training standards were not only sloppy but well below the profe$$ional level required and expected.

Add the recruitment of hampson, thomas, the ridiculous handling of Ivans surgeries and the ignorance of neglecting miles and you have the profile of a complete imbecile.

Whats your points?
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1645 on: August 25, 2014, 12:44:54 AM »
Just hold on a bit boys, this thread will be pumping next week

Along with the mentally week/weak one and the embarrassment one
What happens if we do the impossible and win Chucky? :whistle

Extension
:lol :bow

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1646 on: August 25, 2014, 02:29:07 PM »
Yeh, look.....this is all a bit ironic in a way.

Seems to me the players were put in the unenviable position of having to confront the coach in regards to both his game plan ( was "a carbon copy of Hawks and wasn't working") and then the embarrassing public admission that training standards were not only sloppy but well below the profe$$ional level required and expected.

Add the recruitment of hampson, thomas, the ridiculous handling of Ivans surgeries and the ignorance of neglecting miles and you have the profile of a complete imbecile.

Whats your points?

My point is that Miles should have been promoted earlier, unsure why anyone else cant see this

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1647 on: August 25, 2014, 02:45:33 PM »
Yeh, look.....this is all a bit ironic in a way.

Seems to me the players were put in the unenviable position of having to confront the coach in regards to both his game plan ( was "a carbon copy of Hawks and wasn't working") and then the embarrassing public admission that training standards were not only sloppy but well below the profe$$ional level required and expected.

Add the recruitment of hampson, thomas, the ridiculous handling of Ivans surgeries and the ignorance of neglecting miles and you have the profile of a complete imbecile.

Whats your points?

My point is that Miles should have been promoted earlier, unsure why anyone else cant see this

Well, in that case - as you were  ;D
Caracella and Balmey.

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3694
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1648 on: August 25, 2014, 03:32:58 PM »
Yeh, look.....this is all a bit ironic in a way.

Seems to me the players were put in the unenviable position of having to confront the coach in regards to both his game plan ( was "a carbon copy of Hawks and wasn't working") and then the embarrassing public admission that training standards were not only sloppy but well below the profe$$ional level required and expected.

Add the recruitment of hampson, thomas, the ridiculous handling of Ivans surgeries and the ignorance of neglecting miles and you have the profile of a complete imbecile.

Whats your points?

Agree with it all, but the question is who is out there who could do better?, Please advise 3 possible coaches

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1649 on: August 25, 2014, 03:52:57 PM »

My point is that Miles should have been promoted earlier, unsure why anyone else cant see this

Correct, this was just one of many mistakes made; preseason --> front half of the year, but having said that, it was one of the most glaring and significant mistakes of them all.
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.