Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 315969 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58589
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1920 on: April 20, 2015, 02:38:46 AM »
Next four weeks will be interesting.

Tactically will be challenged!

We have the players to win all four matches.

The question is ...

Can Hardwick's Game Plan beat Melbourne, Geelong, North Melbourne, Collingwood?
All bogey sides - so it's first a case of the players showing up with the right positive attitude, intensity and work ethic. No tactics, structures or overall gameplan will work if the players don't show up to play (see Bulldogs loss).
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3692
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1921 on: April 20, 2015, 11:07:35 AM »
Anyone for Brett Kirk as coach if Dimma fails this year?

I would even accept Captain Kirk

I would be keen, what is he up to this year, he is in the media?? He would need the skin of a Rhino to coach ricjmond

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1922 on: April 20, 2015, 11:43:00 AM »
Anyone for Brett Kirk as coach if Dimma fails this year?

I would even accept Captain Kirk

I would be keen, what is he up to this year, he is in the media?? He would need the skin of a Rhino to coach ricjmond
Brett Kirk is assistant to Lyon at Freo.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1923 on: April 20, 2015, 12:28:16 PM »
Next four weeks will be interesting.

Tactically will be challenged!

We have the players to win all four matches.

The question is ...

Can Hardwick's Game Plan beat Melbourne, Geelong, North Melbourne, Collingwood?
dont think we can beat north. imo the other three games are all 50/50  at best. its funny and sort of says where we are at. some can see us winning all 4, others can see us losing all 4.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1924 on: April 20, 2015, 01:10:38 PM »
They're both fukcwits
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1925 on: April 20, 2015, 07:57:37 PM »
On tv now.

stuffen idiot.

NFI.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9631
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1926 on: April 21, 2015, 03:04:37 PM »
I think a clubs judgement can sometimes be clouded by the close relationships developed with players/coaches. An outside perspective would be an added bonus in assessing the weaknesses of both players & coaches.
Does anyone else think there is some merit in the club employing someone like Bomber Thomson to critique players, coaching moves, weakness etc completely outside of the inner workings of the club?
The club that keeps giving.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40082
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1927 on: April 21, 2015, 06:29:04 PM »

Does anyone else think there is some merit in the club employing someone like Bomber Thomson to critique players, coaching moves, weakness etc completely outside of the inner workings of the club?

I think there is merit in it.

But I reckon the problem comes back to who do you get to do it without there being any possibility of bias or independence

I mean who do you get to chose the person to do the review? The board? CEO? Some sort of working committee?

Just think it wouldn't matter who got the gig different folks with their own agendas would complain
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9631
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1928 on: April 21, 2015, 07:35:09 PM »

Does anyone else think there is some merit in the club employing someone like Bomber Thomson to critique players, coaching moves, weakness etc completely outside of the inner workings of the club?

I think there is merit in it.

But I reckon the problem comes back to who do you get to do it without there being any possibility of bias or independence

I mean who do you get to chose the person to do the review? The board? CEO? Some sort of working committee?

Just think it wouldn't matter who got the gig different folks with their own agendas would complain
it would have to be a footy department appointment id say somebody that Dimma was comfortable with thats why I think Bomber would be perfect.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline potsclub

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1929 on: April 21, 2015, 07:51:08 PM »
It's a great idea, but let's be serious, we have the right bloke sitting on the bench ready to do that job.
Enter Choco.
Will never happen because the club wouldn't like to hear that they are soft and can't make hard decisions.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9631
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1930 on: April 21, 2015, 08:28:57 PM »
It's a great idea, but let's be serious, we have the right bloke sitting on the bench ready to do that job.
Enter Choco.
Will never happen because the club wouldn't like to hear that they are soft and can't make hard decisions.
The idea was someone disconnected with the club without the strong relationships that can cloud ones thinking.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline potsclub

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1931 on: April 21, 2015, 08:34:35 PM »
It's a great idea, but let's be serious, we have the right bloke sitting on the bench ready to do that job.
Enter Choco.
Will never happen because the club wouldn't like to hear that they are soft and can't make hard decisions.
The idea was someone disconnected with the club without the strong relationships that can cloud ones thinking.

Fair enough, my bad.
Like I said would be good for some to hear the truth.

Offline Zlatan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1932 on: April 24, 2015, 10:07:17 PM »
 :clapping

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1933 on: April 24, 2015, 10:34:59 PM »
Pay him out. Bring back Frawley
Go Tigers!

No More

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1934 on: April 24, 2015, 10:37:35 PM »
it doesn't matter who coaches Richmond. the list management of the club is rooted. there are no leaders, there are no real superstars, there is nothing to hang your hat on. the list is rubbish.