Author Topic: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]  (Read 290844 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1470 on: October 16, 2012, 05:32:55 PM »
Why aren't we interested in Clinton Young?
That moment in the Grand Final where he went to ground too easily instead of rushing it through and gifted Jack that goal probably has turned a few clubs off him.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1471 on: October 16, 2012, 05:37:06 PM »
Agree with the above although I think that the event has caused clubs to scrutinize the videos of his past games too. In doing that they would have found a guy with a soft underbelly.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline unplugged

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1472 on: October 16, 2012, 05:46:14 PM »
Can't be any softer than an Edwards, Nahas or Jackson for example.   Or Rodan for that matter who we are linked to. There are about five clubs after Young if you believe the papers.  He would have to be an upgrade over what we have and we could use an outside player who can kick the ball with some penetration.  Most of our outside players have average penetration with their kicks at best.

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1473 on: October 16, 2012, 05:51:21 PM »
Can't be any softer than an Edwards, Nahas or Jackson for example.   Or Rodan for that matter who we are linked to. There are about five clubs after Young if you believe the papers.  He would have to be an upgrade over what we have and we could use an outside player who can kick the ball with some penetration.  Most of our outside players have average penetration with their kicks at best.

Jackson aint soft.  Young is softer than Edwards and probably on par with Nahas, who is much smaller. Young has a nice left boot but that's about it. Average player.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1474 on: October 16, 2012, 05:56:28 PM »
jackson soft?  :lol
thats about the only criticism you cant lay on him.

the poo that gets posted..............
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1475 on: October 16, 2012, 06:28:08 PM »
So GWS is now saying that they are willing to part with early draft picks in order to recruit older, experienced players. I thought that the mini-draft arrangements were designed for that same scenario....yet.....GWS 'played' the system to get the picks instead :banghead. I say to all clubs that they should force them to recruit more youngsters and use them (GWS) as a nursery for future free-agents. Without a spread of ages they will take a decade to be successful.

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1476 on: October 16, 2012, 06:39:15 PM »
So GWS is now saying that they are willing to part with early draft picks in order to recruit older, experienced players. I thought that the mini-draft arrangements were designed for that same scenario....yet.....GWS 'played' the system to get the picks instead :banghead. I say to all clubs that they should force them to recruit more youngsters and use them (GWS) as a nursery for future free-agents. Without a spread of ages they will take a decade to be successful.

Or lets just give them Martin for picks 2, 3,12 and 13 :outtahere

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1477 on: October 16, 2012, 06:45:23 PM »
So GWS is now saying that they are willing to part with early draft picks in order to recruit older, experienced players. I thought that the mini-draft arrangements were designed for that same scenario....yet.....GWS 'played' the system to get the picks instead :banghead. I say to all clubs that they should force them to recruit more youngsters and use them (GWS) as a nursery for future free-agents. Without a spread of ages they will take a decade to be successful.

Or lets just give them Martin for picks 2, 3,12 and 13 :outtahere
Actually, I just posited a similar scenario on the Dusty thread  ;) I would only deal with them if we were to come out as winners in a big way: Tyson and picks 2 and 12....at the least.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1478 on: October 16, 2012, 07:56:27 PM »
jackson soft?  :lol
thats about the only criticism you cant lay on him.

the poo that gets posted..............

I stopped reading at Edwards. Did he really say Jackson was soft?

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1479 on: October 16, 2012, 07:57:52 PM »
So GWS is now saying that they are willing to part with early draft picks in order to recruit older, experienced players. I thought that the mini-draft arrangements were designed for that same scenario....yet.....GWS 'played' the system to get the picks instead :banghead. I say to all clubs that they should force them to recruit more youngsters and use them (GWS) as a nursery for future free-agents. Without a spread of ages they will take a decade to be successful.

Or lets just give them Martin for picks 2, 3,12 and 13 :outtahere
Actually, I just posited a similar scenario on the Dusty thread  ;) I would only deal with them if we were to come out as winners in a big way: Tyson and picks 2 and 12....at the least.

Exchange 12 with 3 and ask for Taylor Adams as well and I'd have to sleep on it.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40310
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1480 on: October 16, 2012, 08:45:10 PM »
Dawes confirmed to the Dees

see:
http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=16740.msg335674#msg335674

Silly Dees

Well done Pies  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1481 on: October 16, 2012, 08:49:11 PM »
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1482 on: October 16, 2012, 08:49:59 PM »
Dees give up pick 4 for Dawes. :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL :ROTFL

This club is shamble after scandal after failure after stupidity after error.

Pies did extremely well out of this. Way to keep the Pies a top 4 side at best and a 5-8 side in transition.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1483 on: October 16, 2012, 09:00:32 PM »
well eff me, has the makings of one of the worst trades of recent times

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1484 on: October 16, 2012, 09:26:17 PM »
No way they did that it will be pick 20 and pick 40 something stuff that
Lots of people name their swords......