my feelings on him are well documented.
its long been my belief that we cannot play all of king edwards and nahas in the one forward line its just too limiting and none imo really offer enough when/if they rotate thru the midfield.
to me the ideal set up is one of nahas, king, s edwards and mcdough as a small forward. these 4 are in competition with each other for one possibly two spots at best.
one of a edwards petterd or ohanlon as a medium marking option and we rotate one the many good mids we have who are capable forwards in, deledio,martin, cotchin,knights conca,
thats 3 forward spots with the other 3 taken by vickery in a paocket as a forward/ruck and kpfs in riewoldt and one of griffiths/astbury/elton.
like others here i think the club will give nahas first option after all he kicked 34 goals. i think s edwards will also play leaving king on the outer unless he can play as a mid.
for me i think for the small fellas to survive they really have to show they can make significant contributions in the midfield. imo nahas would make a good sub injected late in games with his run and pace. at times he has played some decent footy but for me he is just too limited with too many weakneses in his game especially for a small.
as usual im always looking to replace the glass half full types with more rounded types. i certainly classify king and nahas as glass half fulls.
