Author Topic: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?  (Read 1836 times)

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2013, 02:51:07 PM »
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven

Mark Robinson in his Herald-Sun 'Tackle' column had Tucky being charged for striking  ::) but the MRP didn't look at Tucky's actions either. It wouldn't have mattered anyway with Tucky out injured for weeks.
Should have punched Redden in the face. Wouldn't have mattered in the grand scheme of things would have been deserving. ;

Totally gutless and cheap shot by Redden.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2013, 03:03:07 PM »
you come back on the field you're fair game IMO

play on

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #17 on: May 14, 2013, 03:11:27 PM »
you come back on the field you're fair game IMO

play on

Agreed. But Tucky should have punched him in the face while he was laughing at him.  ;D

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #18 on: May 14, 2013, 03:42:28 PM »
Blues BF board is worth a read after Betts copped 5 weeks reduced to 3.  :lol

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #19 on: May 14, 2013, 04:26:01 PM »
Blues BF board is worth a read after Betts copped 5 weeks reduced to 3.  :lol

Agree with Betts deserves to be rubbed out

But struth it makes you wonder how they (MRP) come up the reports and penalties that they do

there is just no consistency
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2013, 06:34:49 PM »
The coin toss came down in our favour

Chaplin's contact to Schulz wasn't even looked at  :rollin

Jay Schulz not so lucky for strking Rance in the first qtr. Got a week but with an early plea and good record he can take a reprimand  ;D

See: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-13/mrp-statement-round-seven

told ya

and westoff should had been reported for faking head high hit to win a free

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2013, 06:45:44 PM »
Kelly from Geelong who copped 2 weeks for what used to be fair bump has had his appeal dismissed

Penalty stands  :gobdrop :gobdrop

RIP the Bump

Thank goodness Scott Turner isn't playing here ads he'd get life under is new pathetic system
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2013, 10:13:33 PM »
Kelly from Geelong who copped 2 weeks for what used to be fair bump has had his appeal dismissed

Penalty stands  :gobdrop :gobdrop

RIP the Bump

Thank goodness Scott Turner isn't playing here ads he'd get life under is new pathetic system

What about Lindsay Thomas in round 1. Garbage.
If Nought kid gets off so should the Geelong kid. :wallywink
You can't clear one and suspend the other. :stupid

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2013, 11:54:02 PM »
He clearly got him high, how's that fair?

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #24 on: May 15, 2013, 01:22:39 AM »
Goddard said it wasn;t high. So either he didn't get him high or Goddard is a liar. Lying about it should warrant an equal suspension of 2 games.  :shh

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Does Chaplin have anything to worry about from the MRP?
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2013, 07:01:37 AM »
Goddard said it wasn;t high. So either he didn't get him high or Goddard is a liar. Lying about it should warrant an equal suspension of 2 games.  :shh

Agree with this  ;D

Thomas got his opponent high, didn't have eyes for the ball only his opponet, was off the ground as well and did more damage but they (MRP) says that's OK because it was a head clash even though at the end of it Thomas' arm is up and away from his bofy

Kelly doesn't raise his arm, is off the ground, doesn't cause any damage even the opponent says that and he cops 2 weeks

Could go on and on case after case that have gone up this season and one minute it's rpeortable the next it's not.

Consistency is the issue here. We don't have any and that's why people are confused and angry

RIP the Bump
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)