Author Topic: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish  (Read 2224 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« on: July 28, 2013, 06:49:55 PM »
Why done continuously play pettard or bachelor or genuine big forwards

Pettarf 185
Bachelor 188

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2013, 06:51:44 PM »
Astbury 195cm in Coburg best again

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2013, 06:57:29 PM »
Agree bents white has murdered us today

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2013, 07:01:45 PM »
Because the other options are poo

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2013, 07:02:54 PM »
If if they are poo at least they are not short

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2013, 07:04:31 PM »
Astbury should have played today full stop. Hardwick stuffed up big time.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2013, 07:06:32 PM »
Its not a one off.

How many times has bachelor played vs resting ruck or tall kpp? A lot.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2013, 07:10:51 PM »
I called for us to draft or trade for tall big bodied back men two years before Chaplin arrived....I was laughed at... :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2013, 07:19:37 PM »
I.htink. Griffitf Ben should. Have played.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2013, 07:23:37 PM »
I called for us to draft or trade for tall big bodied back men two years before Chaplin arrived....I was laughed at... :whistle
:lol
.
.
.
.
.
.
.just joking WAT....I agree with you.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2013, 07:33:57 PM »
The Clarkson school of footy with its mobile rebounding defence and a reliance on the midfield and forwards to apply full ground pressure to protect your backline. Today that pressure didn't occur anywhere near often and long enough. 
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2013, 07:37:13 PM »
Schomarkers 195
Birchill 193
Gibson
Lake

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2013, 07:40:36 PM »
I called for us to draft or trade for tall big bodied back men two years before Chaplin arrived....I was laughed at... :whistle
yeah but you also wanted us to play two tall backmen  against north who play three tall forwards and consequently showed us up in the air down back

bents is on the money. astbury was named in the bests for coburg yet we went in undersized and a gumby like jessie white looked a million dollars against players giving away plenty of hight and size.

poo poor by the the powers that be.

for the last two days ive been trying to work out what their thinking may have been and constantly come up a blank...just like the result
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2013, 07:42:47 PM »
Schomarkers 195
Birchill 193
Gibson
Lake
Schoenmakers despite his height has been a liability in big games over the past 3 years. That's why they chased after Lake. Hardwick was assistant under Clarkson from 2005-2009 so Clarkson may have changed his tune in the past 12 months with the Hawks falling just short in a PF and GF.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: explain to me hardwick undersize backman fetish
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2013, 07:50:49 PM »
Astbury pfffft...get real. When was the last time he did anything at senior level?

Fact is we have 3 decent KP backs, 2 of which are not injured. End of story.

All that aside, its our midfield and forwards who need to play smarter based on this season