Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:49:00 PMQuote from: Jackstar 1960 on August 13, 2016, 03:47:15 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 02:52:12 PMQuote from: Dooks on August 13, 2016, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 PMMcEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunbergerFACT.Don't bring this "FACT" business here, it's utterly annoying.But to the point. Notice that list covers every team in the AFL bar Freo who have Sandi who has been injured? I'm also sure they have back ups who are much better players than Hampson. In fact, I'm going to watch Nankervis with interest tonightFact is that Tippett has missed half the seasonAnd in that half a season has still played better than HampsonI don't think so
Quote from: Jackstar 1960 on August 13, 2016, 03:47:15 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 02:52:12 PMQuote from: Dooks on August 13, 2016, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 PMMcEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunbergerFACT.Don't bring this "FACT" business here, it's utterly annoying.But to the point. Notice that list covers every team in the AFL bar Freo who have Sandi who has been injured? I'm also sure they have back ups who are much better players than Hampson. In fact, I'm going to watch Nankervis with interest tonightFact is that Tippett has missed half the seasonAnd in that half a season has still played better than Hampson
Quote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 02:52:12 PMQuote from: Dooks on August 13, 2016, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 PMMcEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunbergerFACT.Don't bring this "FACT" business here, it's utterly annoying.But to the point. Notice that list covers every team in the AFL bar Freo who have Sandi who has been injured? I'm also sure they have back ups who are much better players than Hampson. In fact, I'm going to watch Nankervis with interest tonightFact is that Tippett has missed half the season
Quote from: Dooks on August 13, 2016, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 PMMcEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunbergerFACT.Don't bring this "FACT" business here, it's utterly annoying.But to the point. Notice that list covers every team in the AFL bar Freo who have Sandi who has been injured? I'm also sure they have back ups who are much better players than Hampson. In fact, I'm going to watch Nankervis with interest tonight
Quote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 PMMcEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunbergerFACT.
McEvoyTippetCeglarSinclairJacobsMumfordRougheadGoldsteinHickeyTrengoveGawnGrundyNichollsMartinKruezerSmithNic NatLeunberger
Quote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahaha
Quote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessions
Quote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparison
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckman
FMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like him
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.
Quote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 08:14:39 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.Maybe twenty years ago but that mould was broken long agoIt is exactly your sort of blinkered view point that will leave the RFC wallowing in mediocrity for another thirty years
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 09:01:56 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 08:14:39 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.Maybe twenty years ago but that mould was broken long agoIt is exactly your sort of blinkered view point that will leave the RFC wallowing in mediocrity for another thirty yearsHit outs aren't the main aspect of a ruckmans skill set, thats gold right there.
Quote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 09:31:41 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 09:01:56 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 08:14:39 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.Maybe twenty years ago but that mould was broken long agoIt is exactly your sort of blinkered view point that will leave the RFC wallowing in mediocrity for another thirty yearsHit outs aren't the main aspect of a ruckmans skill set, thats gold right there. Personally I would want a ruckman that can contribute around the ground rather than tapping it to to the oppositions advantage but anyway keep living on in mediocrity
Quote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 09:45:40 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 09:31:41 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 09:01:56 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 08:14:39 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.Maybe twenty years ago but that mould was broken long agoIt is exactly your sort of blinkered view point that will leave the RFC wallowing in mediocrity for another thirty yearsHit outs aren't the main aspect of a ruckmans skill set, thats gold right there. He is poo and has been slightly less poo this yearPersonally I would want a ruckman that can contribute around the ground rather than tapping it to to the oppositions advantage but anyway keep living on in mediocrityI would want one too, you seem to think that I think Hamspud is a great ruckman, I don't!He is how ever having a decent year in the ruck, contribution around the ground not so much.
Quote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 09:31:41 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 09:01:56 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 08:14:39 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 06:57:33 PMQuote from: Raoul Duke on August 13, 2016, 06:22:55 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 04:35:28 PMQuote from: Stalin on August 13, 2016, 04:15:37 PMQuote from: Yeahright on August 13, 2016, 04:13:32 PMQuote from: Chuck17 on August 13, 2016, 03:23:48 PMFMD if it isn't Phil he certainly trolls like himTrengove the non-ruck is playing ruck better than our ruckman . But it doesn't count because Trengove isn't a ruckmanTo be fair he gets the ball far too muchHence it's not really a far comparisonGood point we should really compare him against ruck man who average less than five possessionsTrengove is a better ruck than the spud 11.7 HO ave. against the spud who averages 3 x that a game And I get called the troll, hahahahaIs hit outs the only apsect to a ruckmans game?Its not the only one but it is the main one.Maybe twenty years ago but that mould was broken long agoIt is exactly your sort of blinkered view point that will leave the RFC wallowing in mediocrity for another thirty yearsHit outs aren't the main aspect of a ruckmans skill set, thats gold right there. He is poo and has been slightly less poo this yearPersonally I would want a ruckman that can contribute around the ground rather than tapping it to to the oppositions advantage but anyway keep living on in mediocrity
I would want one too, you seem to think that I think Hamspud is a great ruckman, I don't!He is how ever having a decent year in the ruck, contribution around the ground not so much.
He'll be our best pick up ever