So some are get excited over Greenwood after one half decent year.
I wouldn't be giving up much for him.
I'm sure the red carpet is been saved for clangerfields arrival.
Don't see anyone really getting all that excited over Greenwood....hell, even bo hasn't talked him up.......yet...
...and we're not going after Dangerfield.....next year's main targets are bigger, better, younger and lie in a more northerly direction....
Tony M thinks he is worth a pick around 20. I'm pretty sure he is over excited!
Anyone else think he is worth pick 20ish?
Not excited, he is comfortably worth a pick in the 20's. Like we'd find a better player with our second pick he's an upgrade on Jackson and Thomas.
You don't even think hes worth a 2nd rounder, you think one of norths best inside mids this season is worth batch or a pick 40+ so probably best to agree to disagree
100% right! I would not give up our second round pick for him. 3rd rounder is about right for a bloke that has had one decent season.
By the way, you said in your original post a pick around 20 would be about right for him. At pick 20 that would be a late first rounder, surly you don't think he is worth a first rounder??
I said 20ish, a second rounder given that 1st rounders end at 18. An early to mid second rounder is about market rate for him - imo.
With compo picks, pick 20 is still first round.
I edited my quote to clear it up and spell it out for you as funnily enough I knew you would be a literal smartarse in true bt tradition, but you still went fishing
I might be a smartarse but at least I would be man enough to admit I got it wrong. Only a flog would try and turn it around like you have just done. You make sense most of the time but as soon as someone challenged you you resort to insults.
Got what wrong? I have never had a problem admitting I am wrong both on this forum and in everyday life. As far as Im aware frawley is the only likely compensation so I assume 20 and beyond is second round, reasonable assumption I would've thought?? I respect peoples right to their own opinion and was/am happy to agree to disagree on this given how different our views are, but I don't think there's any need to be so literal about it. Pretty sure most people would understand what I meant by pick 20ish and Im tipping its not "so you would give up a 1st rounder TM??" or "TM is excited!" comeon..
anyhow I don't think I was resorting to insults, but I apologise for calling you a literal smartarse, I'll replace that with baiting me (and doing a good job)