Author Topic: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?  (Read 11731 times)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #45 on: December 11, 2013, 11:54:09 AM »
19/44 on our list are 22 or younger

Can't find a legit reason to question or complain about that

But I don't have a job in list management so WTF would I know

Offline HKTiger

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #46 on: December 11, 2013, 12:05:06 PM »
Well Hardwick obviously has NFI.

Claw said it was bad and so it must be.  Dimma clearly delusional in the following article.

"Hardwick also expressed overall satisfaction with Richmond’s recruiting over the past couple of months, which has netted the Club a further seven players (Hampson, Ben Lennon, Nathan Gordon, Sam Lloyd, Todd Banfield, Anthony Miles, Matt Thomas).

“Our recruiting guys have done a terrific job once again,” he said.

“The great thing about it, from a coaching point of view, and a football club overall, is every November you get to improve your side, and that’s what we did again this year.”

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-12-11/hardwick-happy-with-hampson

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #47 on: December 11, 2013, 01:14:52 PM »
19/44 on our list are 22 or younger

Can't find a legit reason to question or complain about that

But I don't have a job in list management so WTF would I know
Going backwards unless it's 44/44.  :banghead

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #48 on: December 11, 2013, 02:07:38 PM »
19/44 on our list are 22 or younger

Can't find a legit reason to question or complain about that

But I don't have a job in list management so WTF would I know
Going backwards unless it's 44/44.  :banghead
Claw will probably be then complain that the coaching staff are too old! :lol
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #49 on: December 11, 2013, 02:41:59 PM »
18% of people in here think we completely stuffed it up  ;D

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #50 on: December 11, 2013, 04:37:10 PM »
of which only two were prepared to put their balls on the line and try to prove they can do better.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #51 on: December 11, 2013, 09:33:45 PM »
of which only two were prepared to put their balls on the line and try to prove they can do better.

From memory I was one of those Alfred so whats the problem?  ;D

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #52 on: December 11, 2013, 09:51:57 PM »
Bang!

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #53 on: December 11, 2013, 11:55:47 PM »
of which only two were prepared to put their balls on the line and try to prove they can do better.

From memory I was one of those Alfred so whats the problem?  ;D
Yes you were.  :clapping

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #54 on: December 12, 2013, 08:39:31 AM »
of which only two were prepared to put their balls on the line and try to prove they can do better.

From memory I was one of those Alfred so whats the problem?  ;D
i know you were. i even posted a picture of a bloke sitting on two rocks in reply, that was censored.

that wasnt a dig at you gramps  :cheers
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #55 on: December 12, 2013, 09:51:35 AM »
No worries Lamumba  ;D

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #56 on: December 12, 2013, 10:32:56 AM »
 :lol

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #57 on: December 12, 2013, 12:25:16 PM »
Ramps...A Man with bigger balls than a fake sign language interpreter at a worldwide event.  ;D


the claw

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #58 on: December 14, 2013, 12:34:48 AM »
Well Hardwick obviously has NFI.

Claw said it was bad and so it must be.  Dimma clearly delusional in the following article.

"Hardwick also expressed overall satisfaction with Richmond’s recruiting over the past couple of months, which has netted the Club a further seven players (Hampson, Ben Lennon, Nathan Gordon, Sam Lloyd, Todd Banfield, Anthony Miles, Matt Thomas).

“Our recruiting guys have done a terrific job once again,” he said.

“The great thing about it, from a coaching point of view, and a football club overall, is every November you get to improve your side, and that’s what we did again this year.”

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-12-11/hardwick-happy-with-hampson
just two things. whos blaming hardwick ive often said i really hope the case is our coach has minimal input into recruiting and list management.
oh of course hardwick is going to say hes happy with who we got. what else can he say.

i dont get the  angst.  all because one or two people are  saying bloody hell why just one kid in  lennon, why  so so so many mature and veteran types where is the balance.

personally ive strongly advocated we take our fair share of mature players even veterans, but never take these older types almost exclusively. which is exactly what we have done.
bloody hell i would have been over the moon if we could have taken chapman , but in f/a  and we still take our share of kids. there are plenty state leaguers i like take em cheap  take 4 or 5 but bloody hell lets still take our proper share of kids.

only one club did forgo almost entirely youth.  that club was us. i would have been happy with 3 kids 5 mature or vice versa. not the 1 to 7 ratio we ended up with.
ive debated long and hard about the processes we go thru and getting them right. this is not a process id ever want us to go thru again because its  just too lopsided.

ive always advocated kids in the first 3 rounds within reason, mature players after that point with in reason.  of course there can be some variations. . im a firm believer if you regularly go thru good processes and stick to em you build a good footy team with few list problems.
ive been in the main  happy with how we have gone about most things, the number of kids where we take our mature players finding a good balance. that is  until this trade/draft period.

finally hardwick has no idea nor do we if those we have taklen will improve us. atm we hope they will.  that little bug bear wont be known until well into next yr. with so many mature players taken you would want to hope they offer something significant.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95459
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did we rate Richmond's 2013 recruiting effort?
« Reply #59 on: October 15, 2018, 05:09:13 PM »
As the thread title says -- How did we all rate Richmond's recruiting this off-season?


                                             DOB          Hgt       Wgt       Position                 Club
 
Trade: Shaun Hampson       21/03/1988     201cm  104kg    Ruckman                 Carlton

ND 12: Ben Lennon             05/07/1995    189cm    90kg     Midsized Forward      Northern Knights

ND 50: Nathan Gordon         12/02/1990    188cm    87kg     Midsized Forward      North Adelaide

ND 66: Sam Lloyd               03/03/1990    181cm    85kg     Small Forward          Frankston

RD 11: Todd Banfield           28/06/1990    183cm    83kg     Small Forward          Brisbane

RD 27: Anthony Miles          28/02/1992    179cm    77kg     Inside Midfielder        Greater Western Sydney

RD 42: Matt Thomas           27/02/1987    186cm    87kg     Inside Midfielder        Port Adelaide (AFL)

5 years later and all gone  :P.