I believe that one of the reasons why both Carlton and Tigers lost their opening games was because they have spent more time preparing for this game than their first round clash.
Struth you'd hope that wasn't the case
An indictment on both clubs even if remotely true.
Indictment or not, I believe that this game means more to both clubs than their first games against Port & GC respectively. I think they would have done their homework but would have spent more of the off-season thinking about the Carlton v Richmond clash. Purely speculation on my behalf but our recent history, painful 2013 exit and player interviews is enough for me to suggest that that this could be the case.
Again, I would say I hope your theory isn't remotely close to the truth Stripes.
Every H&A game is important, they are worth exactly the same thing whether it's a game -v- GC, Carlton or Hawthron and that is 4 points. And those 4 points for a win means you have to get enough of them to get to September. I don't think any club let alone ours can take an attitude at the start of the season that one game is more important than any other. Simply we aren't that good (yet) and to think otherwise is foolish at best
Agree they would have been looking at how to beat Carlton but they'd also be looking at how to beat N0rt, Geelong, C'wood; teams we've struggled against too.
The club was very clear in their message that getting off to a "fast" start regarding wins was important to us. To suggest that the Club put more planning into beating the Blues before playing the GC goes directly against everything they've been preaching in the pre-season (IMVHO)