NO..no more short term fill ins....Lets grow our own
jaksch is just 19yo. the scenario would be similar to melb getting tyson. jaksch would be neither a short term fill in and we would still have to develop him.if you think our current list of talls is good enough or even enough id say your kidding yourself.
people do realise vickery gets games because there are so few tall fwd options.
for sure trade him but target someone like kristian jaksch.
or take the best pick we can get and target a promising tall fwd with it in the nd in the mean time take a short term fill in.
Good option although I would ask for a pick upgrade too with Jaksch.
i was only useing jaksch as an example of the type of player we should trade vickery for
jaksch is struggling to get a game in front of boyd, cameron, and patton and they would have no need for vickery unless they thought they could turn him into a ruckman so perhaps gws is not the right place to try and trade vickery to.
maybe vickery to essendon or the dogs and we onload that pick to gws for jaksch.
i still very much like the look of jeremy mcgovern but that isnt possible anymore with the eagles promoting him to their senior list. shane kersten at geelong i was hopeful we would draft hes not getting a game at geelong.
or id be just as happy to trade him out for a decent pick there are some real good talls in the nd and instead of useing one or two good picks on talls we could use 3.