Author Topic: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?  (Read 8217 times)

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #75 on: June 18, 2014, 12:04:26 PM »
I honestly think some people get their opinions of opposition players from either how opposition players play against RFC or their highlight reels

Like everyone's opinion of Eddie Betts?? No one (this forum or the club) wanted him and look at him now, playing some of the best footy of his career!!

Perhaps not enough attention is paid to these types of players and we miss out, story of our recruitment life!!!
No one wanted Eddie at the price he was asking. 500k. He's not worth that. But he'd look good in our side no doubt.

We need a speedy, small forward. Garlett has shown he is AFL standard at that role. It all comes down to cost. If we can give up what Hampson is worth then go for it. We need to pay those pricks back.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #76 on: June 18, 2014, 12:16:09 PM »
Also, I am afraid the times have changed, players are going to put bigger prices on their heads, we can thank Buddy for that. Look at what Betts gets, look at what Frawley wants. We have to move with the times or we will miss out. We need to start putting up the cash otherwise we will fall out of the picture completely.

I think gone are the days of saying players are over priced, we will have to pay what they want or ..... :-\

I don't agree with it but its the new world of over priced players
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #77 on: June 18, 2014, 01:16:52 PM »
what are people willing to give up for Garlett?

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #78 on: June 18, 2014, 01:20:22 PM »
what are people willing to give up for Garlett?
My seat on our bandwagon to hell  ;D

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #79 on: June 18, 2014, 02:03:33 PM »
I honestly think some people get their opinions of opposition players from either how opposition players play against RFC or their highlight reels

Would explain why some people backed the Hamspud trade....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #80 on: June 18, 2014, 02:06:37 PM »
We don't need another crumbing forward when have McBean developing in the reserves.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #81 on: June 18, 2014, 07:02:01 PM »
what are people willing to give up for Garlett?

Must be players, no picks.

Foley
Houli
Batch
Helbig
Grigg (but won't happen)


They would entice the scum.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #82 on: June 18, 2014, 07:06:43 PM »
Dayle >

Younger
Cheaper
Rookie
Culture means FA when your last. Would rather wannabe gangster wanker that can play, over half of current list.

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #83 on: June 18, 2014, 07:22:45 PM »
Dayle >

Younger
Cheaper
Rookie
Culture means FA when your last. Would rather wannabe gangster wanker that can play, over half of current list.

My sentiments exactly. If he's anything like Ben Cousins, controversy would probably make him a better player.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #84 on: June 18, 2014, 08:05:04 PM »
what are people willing to give up for Garlett?

Dimma, Daly, Williams (not Chocco), Hartley and the last 32 years.

Offline Beans

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #85 on: June 18, 2014, 08:10:11 PM »
Played for the Northern Bullsnts against us last week and was very average. Do we need another clubs duds (again)?

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40317
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #86 on: June 18, 2014, 09:19:04 PM »
what are people willing to give up for Garlett?

Must be players, no picks.

Foley
Houli
Batch
Helbig
Grigg (but won't happen)


They would entice the scum.

You reckon?

Not a chance in hell that Mick Malthouse would want any of those at the blues.

Would demand better than that or picks
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #87 on: June 18, 2014, 09:45:46 PM »

It coincides with Carlton being 2h1t this year too IMO.
Serious question- have you ever seen him play? Because if you had of, you would know he is a pretty good footballer. You don't kick 40 odd goals in the AFL for the last 4 seasons as a genuine small forward with another "better" small forward taking some of your crumbs. That's as straight forward as it needs to go!

Would that be the same Jeff Garlett who had a 13 possession, 1 point game against us in the 2's this week, getting shut down by Matt McDonough?

when matt manages to ave more than 10 possesions a game for 4 or 5 weeks in a row yet alone ave 4o odd goals a season he may get a bit of credability. some people insist they actually do something before acclaiming them.

cmon smokey as far as kicking goals go for sml fwds over a decent period , in this case the previous 4 yrs,  garlett over that period is almost unmatched by any player other than milne and his former team mate betts.  for a sml fwd hes been elite when it comes to hitting the scoreboard.
if you gave me the choice at the start of the yr of taking betts or garlett i would have taken garlett.

ffs we scream out for yrs for a GOALKICKING QUICK SMART CRUMBIMG SML FWD.  Heres a bloke who fits that bill perfectly who may be on the market who is out of contract and we could get him very cheap, has a proven track record,  is still only 24, without doubt would be a massive upgrade on any sml fwd we have had in yrs,  and the nuffies here turn their noses up at him. and they tern their noses up at him not based on his over all  performances  but because hes from carlton, or they would rather draft a kid at pick 60  thats where sml fwds get taken , or god forbid he missed a sitter from the goal square once.  unbelievable.
take garlett cheap use a late nd or rookie pick and get a kid in to the system while at it. how hard is it. fair dinkum its time people stopped and had a proper think abouty what they post.


Edited to correct quote
Just because some of us disagree,  doesn't mean you have to throw a hissy fit!
He was good with Betts on a consistent basis.  Without Betts he looks lost. I think the two are related but I may be wrong.  But then again, you may be wrong!  Have you considered that?

hissy fit lol. just gobsmacked at peoples ignorance and for want of a better way of saying it one eyedness.
mate im doing nothing but looking at the blokes performances up to this yr. hes a sml fwd hes expected to kick goals and in that regard hes been very good. .  if your chasing a GOAL KICKING SML  FWD  There arent many better better performed.

get him cheap i kinda think thats the whole idea of the debate,  and do the right thing and draft a kid in the nd of similar type  or rookie draft who has plenty of pace has good skills and kicks goals.

lol at those saying get someone better. if you took the time to look at his overall performances as a goal kicker there arent many better performed sml fwds to be had.  hes shown over a 4 yr stretch just how damaging he can be when it comes to hitting the scoreboard isnt that exactly what we have lacked. hes no unproven product like hampson. and yes i have acknowledged hes having a lousy yr to date  but you know what? when you look at his overall performances  a blind man can see that this yr is the exception to the rule.
 ffs you have silly people on here not wanting him for no other reason than he missed a a sitter in the goal square, or just as bad he had a bad game against mcdonough in the twos, yeah right lets just ignore what went before eh.
its not a hissy fit at all, its incredulity at the stupidity of some. for sure if you dont like him as a player fine but ffs a decent counter argument as to why would not go astray.

and just to finish i have little time for sml players in the game they really have to bring something exceptional to the table for me to usually even look at em, garletts record as far as goal kicking goes demands we at the least respectfully have a good look at what he offers before just willy nilly proclaiming him a dud.

just to finish name just one more effective sml fwd that we have had than garlett in the last 10 yrs. i can think of just nathan brown and he cost picks 6 and 20 to get him.
.

Offline flea03

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #88 on: June 18, 2014, 09:45:55 PM »
garlett is soft, ducks his head in fear too many times

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Jeff Garlett to Richmond?
« Reply #89 on: June 18, 2014, 10:20:43 PM »

It coincides with Carlton being 2h1t this year too IMO.
Serious question- have you ever seen him play? Because if you had of, you would know he is a pretty good footballer. You don't kick 40 odd goals in the AFL for the last 4 seasons as a genuine small forward with another "better" small forward taking some of your crumbs. That's as straight forward as it needs to go!

Would that be the same Jeff Garlett who had a 13 possession, 1 point game against us in the 2's this week, getting shut down by Matt McDonough?

when matt manages to ave more than 10 possesions a game for 4 or 5 weeks in a row yet alone ave 4o odd goals a season he may get a bit of credability. some people insist they actually do something before acclaiming them.

cmon smokey as far as kicking goals go for sml fwds over a decent period , in this case the previous 4 yrs,  garlett over that period is almost unmatched by any player other than milne and his former team mate betts.  for a sml fwd hes been elite when it comes to hitting the scoreboard.
if you gave me the choice at the start of the yr of taking betts or garlett i would have taken garlett.

ffs we scream out for yrs for a GOALKICKING QUICK SMART CRUMBIMG SML FWD.  Heres a bloke who fits that bill perfectly who may be on the market who is out of contract and we could get him very cheap, has a proven track record,  is still only 24, without doubt would be a massive upgrade on any sml fwd we have had in yrs,  and the nuffies here turn their noses up at him. and they tern their noses up at him not based on his over all  performances  but because hes from carlton, or they would rather draft a kid at pick 60  thats where sml fwds get taken , or god forbid he missed a sitter from the goal square once.  unbelievable.
take garlett cheap use a late nd or rookie pick and get a kid in to the system while at it. how hard is it. fair dinkum its time people stopped and had a proper think abouty what they post.


Edited to correct quote
Just because some of us disagree,  doesn't mean you have to throw a hissy fit!
He was good with Betts on a consistent basis.  Without Betts he looks lost. I think the two are related but I may be wrong.  But then again, you may be wrong!  Have you considered that?

hissy fit lol. just gobsmacked at peoples ignorance and for want of a better way of saying it one eyedness.
mate im doing nothing but looking at the blokes performances up to this yr. hes a sml fwd hes expected to kick goals and in that regard hes been very good. .  if your chasing a GOAL KICKING SML  FWD  There arent many better better performed.

get him cheap i kinda think thats the whole idea of the debate,  and do the right thing and draft a kid in the nd of similar type  or rookie draft who has plenty of pace has good skills and kicks goals.

lol at those saying get someone better. if you took the time to look at his overall performances as a goal kicker there arent many better performed sml fwds to be had.  hes shown over a 4 yr stretch just how damaging he can be when it comes to hitting the scoreboard isnt that exactly what we have lacked. hes no unproven product like hampson. and yes i have acknowledged hes having a lousy yr to date  but you know what? when you look at his overall performances  a blind man can see that this yr is the exception to the rule.
 ffs you have silly people on here not wanting him for no other reason than he missed a a sitter in the goal square, or just as bad he had a bad game against mcdonough in the twos, yeah right lets just ignore what went before eh.
its not a hissy fit at all, its incredulity at the stupidity of some. for sure if you dont like him as a player fine but ffs a decent counter argument as to why would not go astray.

and just to finish i have little time for sml players in the game they really have to bring something exceptional to the table for me to usually even look at em, garletts record as far as goal kicking goes demands we at the least respectfully have a good look at what he offers before just willy nilly proclaiming him a dud.

just to finish name just one more effective sml fwd that we have had than garlett in the last 10 yrs. i can think of just nathan brown and he cost picks 6 and 20 to get him.
.
Still no comment on his performances without Betts around......
Care to comment?
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.