Author Topic: Trade week rumours and innuendo  (Read 218665 times)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #45 on: August 01, 2014, 06:37:46 PM »
Haven't we got all those duds signed up though tone? FFS.  :banghead
only grigg and hampson as far as im aware.

This weeks Inside Football mag, Ricky Petterd isn't listed as being one of ours coming out of contract

I thought I had read somewhere he got a 2year deal when he was promoted.
was pretty sure he only got one yr but could be wrong.
lmao houli, hampson shedwards vickery and chaplin all contracted till end of 2016.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13934
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #46 on: August 01, 2014, 07:10:00 PM »
thats not true is it claw, that last line.

surely not all of them until 2016?
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #47 on: August 01, 2014, 07:22:47 PM »
Once again O'Keefe would be a fine pick-up if the list didn't already contain multiple mature aged wasted picks.

If we didn't take proven mediocre players at AFL level like A Edwards, Stephenson, Thomas, Hampson, et al and think that somehow they will magically change when they walk in the door of Richmond, and took proven guns like O'Keefe, Chapman et al when we needed to fill a list gap, I'd be a lot happier.
you do realise theres a very good chance that many of the mediocre mature players will be cut.

newman, king  already gone, a edwards  will either retire or be cut, stephenson will retire or be cut.petterd is out of contract and could be cut if need be. banfield is a mature player will likely get cut. throw in 3 or 4 of the batchelors deas helbigs  etc who arent exactly kids and surely we can make room for one or two quality older players.

the following yr your houlis griggs thomas gordon lloyd come into the gunsights.

id be okay with us taking 5 or 6 kids  and 3 or 4 mature players of which one or two could be 28 plus.
lol Petterd, Houli, Grigg, Lloyd, Gordon are all no chance to be cut. Thomas aswell
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #48 on: August 01, 2014, 07:28:20 PM »
thats not true is it claw, that last line.

surely not all of them until 2016?
not true










Vickery is till 2017.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #49 on: August 01, 2014, 07:31:58 PM »
 :rollin

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #50 on: August 01, 2014, 07:36:24 PM »

you do realise theres a very good chance that many of the mediocre mature players will be cut.


You do realise our coaches and recruiters are a pack of nuffies and will probably keep them all?
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #51 on: August 01, 2014, 07:37:26 PM »
thats not true is it claw, that last line.

surely not all of them until 2016?
not true










Vickery is till 2017.
thats just plain old nasty tigs, shame on you.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #52 on: August 01, 2014, 07:42:08 PM »

you do realise theres a very good chance that many of the mediocre mature players will be cut.


You do realise our coaches and recruiters are a pack of nuffies and will probably keep them all?
that is the obvious concern. but even i can hope cant i?

my logic tells me while fj is there we are wasting our time taking kids anyway. but i still have a list of kids id like us to take.hence i have a list od players i hope we cut but as you say with so many nuffies in charge, im wasting my time naming them. it wont happen we are still locked and loaded.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13934
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #53 on: August 01, 2014, 08:04:39 PM »
how he FJ still has a job is probably the main reason we are where we are.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #54 on: August 01, 2014, 08:19:10 PM »
I thought we had a succession plan for FJ - Luke Williams.  He is working with FJ and I wouldn't be surprised if he takes over soon. Should have a few handy contacts from his time at Geelong with Stephen Wells.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13934
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #55 on: August 01, 2014, 08:23:37 PM »
I thought we had a succession plan for FJ - Luke Williams.  He is working with FJ and I wouldn't be surprised if he takes over soon. Should have a few handy contacts from his time at Geelong with Stephen Wells.

I wouldnt hold my breath. The bloke is made of steel or something. How he survived the wallace cull is one of life's mysteries.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #56 on: August 01, 2014, 09:17:28 PM »
FJ has gone okay.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #57 on: August 01, 2014, 09:24:33 PM »
Haven't we got all those duds signed up though tone? FFS.  :banghead
only grigg and hampson as far as im aware.

This weeks Inside Football mag, Ricky Petterd isn't listed as being one of ours coming out of contract

I thought I had read somewhere he got a 2year deal when he was promoted.
was pretty sure he only got one yr but could be wrong.
Our OER contracts list has Petterd with just one year. The RFC article about his elevation to the senior list only mentioned 2014.

Mature-age rookie Ricky Petterd, who played 12 games in his debut season at Tigerland, will be elevated to the senior list for the 2014 season.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2013-10-30/richmond-list-changes
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1125
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #58 on: August 01, 2014, 11:03:55 PM »
I think Ryan O'Keefe would be a good pick up.
If we got rid of a couple of other duds I'd be happy to have him.

Exactly: Thank you  :clapping :clapping

Disagree completely. Would be a massive recruiting faux pax.

Richmond need raw line speed, goal kicking ability and defensive pressure in the forward half not overage single season players (for RFC) that have had better days at their previous clubs.
Keep the B graders and young talent- Vlaustin, Grimes, Ellis, Dea, Maric, Miles, Vickory, Conca, McBean, Lennon, Morris and Foley.

That's the thing O'Keefe keeps Lennon out, so you advocate for an aged recycled player limiting the development opportunities of a young draftee already in the RFC system.
Even O'Hanlon (if he is kept on the list) is unable to develop further at VFL level as the lead-up forward if O'Keefe is acquired.
I just do not understand that logic stream.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Trade week rumours and innuendo
« Reply #59 on: August 02, 2014, 12:42:24 AM »
Quote
O'Keefe keeps Lennon out,

Grimes Astbury Bachelor
Vlastuin Rance Dea/Houli
Ellis Cotchin S Edwards
O'Keefe  Vickery/McBean  Lennon
Martin Reiwoldt Deledio
Maric Miles Conca

#pick1 #pick2 


Quote
Even O'Hanlon (if he is kept on the list) is unable to develop further at VFL level as the lead-up forward if O'Keefe is acquired.
I just do not understand that logic stream.

Ideally OHanlon would compete with Lennon and take over from Okeefe in the future.

The problem is we play the like of Arnot out of position in the forward line and questionable types: Thomas, Grigg, Pettard, King, Newman in these important positions.   
« Last Edit: August 02, 2014, 11:02:17 AM by Judge Roughneck »