you clowns, this is exactly the sort of banter that keeps RFCO away from here
i think the last 5 years have been a good return with picks 20-20, compared to the 5yrs before that.
Its a bit of luck and how good the recruiter is. Take 2011 for example better players found in picks 30-40
hmmm, thought provoking
Well someone had to Albert. Your continual picks are arse rhetoric after 20 is actually incorrect.
i think the last 5 years have been a good return with picks 20-20, compared to the 5yrs before that.
Its a bit of luck and how good the recruiter is. Take 2011 for example better players found in picks 30-40
Please add the source of this information.
Where else mate Google wiki
wtf has my post you quoted got to do with this?
and what r picks 20-20?
that my ignorant little boy is the thought provoking part.
On to your statement, how do you judge how well these picks have gone?
I'm willing to bet it is a subjective view, which is just one persons opinion. if you want to make such claims you need a measurement to quantify what is a success.
but just out of curiosity, how many of 200+ picks taken after 20 in the last 5 years do you reckon are sucessfull. (and how do you determine success)?
