Author Topic: Reece McKenzie [merged]  (Read 27717 times)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #60 on: November 28, 2014, 07:22:49 AM »
Still pinching myself this kid got through, an Fj classic, has hands like a steel trap and is built like King kong, my only advice , brace yourselves, this kid goes alright   :clapping
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #61 on: November 28, 2014, 10:12:07 AM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/peter-wright-vs-reece-mckenzie.1081600/:shh
Even  :bow :bow BF phantom draft poster Knightmare mentioned he thought McKenzie had the attributes to make him the best of this draft in the future! :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping

Heard from another poster when his coach told McKenzie to move into the ruck the runner was told to "**** off Im staying here"

I think I am In love

Plugger.   

 :bow :bow  :bow :bow

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #62 on: November 28, 2014, 11:10:17 AM »
Reckon he'd be a gun in 1987.
why 87 why not now.
have you looked at the height and size of the better performed kpfs in the comp
franklin cloke walker, podsiadlly, brown,pavlich, lynch, patton petrie and on it goes.
just about every club has a tall fwd of mckenzies height and sizearound the 195cm/100kg mark. at last we at least have one on our list.
i find it amazing that you think these types are a thing of the past when the reality is blokes around mckenzies height and size have been and continue to be the better fwds in the game.
me i m pleased we finally have one like him now we need to see if he can play at the level.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #63 on: November 28, 2014, 01:58:39 PM »
Apparently loves the sauce
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #64 on: November 28, 2014, 02:05:48 PM »
Reckon he'd be a gun in 1987.
why 87 why not now.
have you looked at the height and size of the better performed kpfs in the comp
franklin cloke walker, podsiadlly, brown,pavlich, lynch, patton petrie and on it goes.
just about every club has a tall fwd of mckenzies height and sizearound the 195cm/100kg mark. at last we at least have one on our list.
i find it amazing that you think these types are a thing of the past when the reality is blokes around mckenzies height and size have been and continue to be the better fwds in the game.
me i m pleased we finally have one like him now we need to see if he can play at the level.
Spot on. Jack needed help and we've been able to get some help here. Now we actually need to develop him as a big KPF not a full back.  ;D

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #65 on: November 28, 2014, 02:48:15 PM »
Reckon he'd be a gun in 1987.
why 87 why not now.
have you looked at the height and size of the better performed kpfs in the comp
franklin cloke walker, podsiadlly, brown,pavlich, lynch, patton petrie and on it goes.
just about every club has a tall fwd of mckenzies height and sizearound the 195cm/100kg mark. at last we at least have one on our list.
i find it amazing that you think these types are a thing of the past when the reality is blokes around mckenzies height and size have been and continue to be the better fwds in the game.
me i m pleased we finally have one like him now we need to see if he can play at the level.
Spot on. Jack needed help and we've been able to get some help here. Now we actually need to develop him as a big KPF not a full back;D

 :clapping
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #66 on: November 28, 2014, 04:14:33 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/peter-wright-vs-reece-mckenzie.1081600/:shh
Even  :bow :bow BF phantom draft poster Knightmare mentioned he thought McKenzie had the attributes to make him the best of this draft in the future! :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping

Heard from another poster when his coach told McKenzie to move into the ruck the runner was told to "**** off Im staying here"

I think I am In love

Plugger.   

 :bow :bow  :bow :bow
ahh so he has a poo attitude, might be why he slid down the order.  Might turn out to be Fevola Mk II if he is like that.  Hope not.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #67 on: November 28, 2014, 04:28:46 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/peter-wright-vs-reece-mckenzie.1081600/:shh
Even  :bow :bow BF phantom draft poster Knightmare mentioned he thought McKenzie had the attributes to make him the best of this draft in the future! :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping

Heard from another poster when his coach told McKenzie to move into the ruck the runner was told to "**** off Im staying here"

I think I am In love

Plugger.   

 :bow :bow  :bow :bow
ahh so he has a poo attitude, might be why he slid down the order.  Might turn out to be Fevola Mk II if he is like that.  Hope not.

I don't know, ta wit ta woo, I'd be quite pleased if we got a 99-goal season out of a 5th rounder, even if it was just the one.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #68 on: November 28, 2014, 04:33:32 PM »
I reckon he will kick bagfulls, he has all the tools.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #69 on: November 28, 2014, 05:03:28 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/peter-wright-vs-reece-mckenzie.1081600/.  :shhno
Even  :bow :bow BF phantom draft poster Knightmare mentioned he thought McKenzie had the attributes to make him the best of this draft in the future! :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping

Heard from another poster when his coach told McKenzie to move into the ruck the runner was told to "**** off Im staying here"

I think I am In love

Plugger.   

 :bow :bow  :bow :bow

If that is true I wonder how he will take Jack pointing. Would be good if he comes on and is that hard leading full forward.  Be interesting as to what we do with Jack
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #70 on: November 28, 2014, 05:05:56 PM »
Can only be good for Jack, will take a lot of the heat off of him and and he will be able to run amok.  They won't be able to stop them all.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #71 on: November 28, 2014, 05:23:46 PM »
play him on the wing so can do some pointing outside the 50
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #72 on: November 28, 2014, 06:17:21 PM »
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/peter-wright-vs-reece-mckenzie.1081600/:shh
Even  :bow :bow BF phantom draft poster Knightmare mentioned he thought McKenzie had the attributes to make him the best of this draft in the future! :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping

Heard from another poster when his coach told McKenzie to move into the ruck the runner was told to "**** off Im staying here"



I think I am In love

Plugger.   

 :bow :bow  :bow :bow

Takes more than that to be a plugger,my friend.

I see that^ as a poo quality and a disciplinary issue.

Hopes he's not total dkichead
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2484
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #73 on: November 28, 2014, 09:32:52 PM »
Its the coaches job to deal with idiots and pull their heads in. Crack the whip early on em or you end up in Fevola land.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #74 on: November 28, 2014, 11:11:57 PM »
FWIW, Jon Patton when picked up in the draft by GWS was 197cm 101kg  :shh