Author Topic: Reece McKenzie [merged]  (Read 27739 times)

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #135 on: January 03, 2015, 03:51:47 PM »
If the BF rumour is true (which I doubt) - Ty needs to worry about his own backyard by earning respect instead of having assumed as a respected player from his time on our list
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #136 on: January 03, 2015, 04:33:28 PM »
Rule 101 , don't believe everything you read on bf  :lol
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #137 on: January 03, 2015, 05:20:59 PM »
If the BF rumour is true (which I doubt) - Ty needs to worry about his own backyard by earning respect instead of having assumed as a respected player from his time on our list
Ty is well respected at the club HRT, and well liked. He is a different cat by all reports but that's ok too.
I hope this rumor is true, nothing wrong with a bit of 'friendly' aggression. I'd hope big Reece earned a bit of respect of his own. Good on the lad. 

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #138 on: January 03, 2015, 05:43:25 PM »
Depends if it was a sneaky one after the bell, if so then lookout next time a sparing session is ON. TV knows his way around a ring just quietly and is a dab hand at martial arts , put it this way ,,I wouldn't wanna run into him in a dark alley  :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #139 on: January 03, 2015, 06:10:12 PM »
Rule 101 , don't believe everything anything you read on bf  :lol

Edited for accuracy

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #140 on: January 03, 2015, 08:18:45 PM »
If the BF rumour is true (which I doubt) - Ty needs to worry about his own backyard by earning respect instead of having assumed as a respected player from his time on our list
Ty is well respected at the club HRT, and well liked. He is a different cat by all reports but that's ok too.
I hope this rumor is true, nothing wrong with a bit of 'friendly' aggression. I'd hope big Reece earned a bit of respect of his own. Good on the lad.
That's all fine BT but what exactly has he done on the field to warrant any genuine respect from his teammates?
Don't doubt he's a great bloke, clubman etc but perhaps that's been part of our issue in the past when striving to be elite in the competition?
Question, do you think Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell or Roughhead would respect Ty if he were at the Hawks? Would he still be there? I also hope the rumour is true as we need kids to challenge the so called leaders at our club
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #141 on: January 03, 2015, 09:40:59 PM »
If the BF rumour is true (which I doubt) - Ty needs to worry about his own backyard by earning respect instead of having assumed as a respected player from his time on our list
Ty is well respected at the club HRT, and well liked. He is a different cat by all reports but that's ok too.
I hope this rumor is true, nothing wrong with a bit of 'friendly' aggression. I'd hope big Reece earned a bit of respect of his own. Good on the lad.
That's all fine BT but what exactly has he done on the field to warrant any genuine respect from his teammates?
Don't doubt he's a great bloke, clubman etc but perhaps that's been part of our issue in the past when striving to be elite in the competition?
Question, do you think Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell or Roughhead would respect Ty if he were at the Hawks? Would he still be there? I also hope the rumour is true as we need kids to challenge the so called leaders at our club
Mate he has played nearly 100 games of AFL footy and kicked 100 goals. That's more than 99.9% of everybody you/we know. It doesn't really matter what you think of him, the coaches of our footy club obviously rate him and respect him otherwise he would be on our list. You don't know how hard he trains or what extra work he may do, all things that get respect off coaches and teammates.
And to answer your question on the Hawthorn boys, I don't really care what they think.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9983
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #142 on: January 04, 2015, 10:22:17 AM »
Hope it's true.

Want a big KPF who will be intimidating on the field. No more lean pussies.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #143 on: January 04, 2015, 11:58:34 AM »
at 196 cm he is too short to ruck, from the highlights he is a stay at home full forward or CHF. Good luck to Reece hope he makes it.
and that is exactly what we want. a bloke who may become a very good stay at home kpf.a bloke capable of exclusively playing kpf. ive argued we have not had  that with vickery or griffiths as neither have shown after 6 and 5 yrs respectively that they can play kp exclusively.they may yet prove me wrong but id sure like to spread the eggs to other baskets.

genuine power fwd size, freakin quick so will be hard to stop on the lead, takes a contested grab consistently, has very good agility for a bloke his size and he kicks goals.
not sure what other recruiters didnt like if it was nothing more than poor interview then they all have rocks in their heads.

my understanding of why he may have slipped a little bit was, he had not done too much against the better sides and better players.
i think for a pick in the 70s he is a great pick. we need to give more talls chances with these late and rookie picks.

i still advocate at least one more tall fwd on our list,
even if i include mcbean vickery griffiths with riewoldt and mckenzie there really is room for one more tall fwd, the type that is missing is the gunston crameri mayne lynch type imo.

vickery and griffiths to justify all the faith really do need to take their games to another level.there are no more excuses.

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #144 on: January 04, 2015, 12:07:58 PM »
I also think both Griff and Ty need to crank it up a few notches this year

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #145 on: January 04, 2015, 12:19:06 PM »
If the BF rumour is true (which I doubt) - Ty needs to worry about his own backyard by earning respect instead of having assumed as a respected player from his time on our list
Ty is well respected at the club HRT, and well liked. He is a different cat by all reports but that's ok too.
I hope this rumor is true, nothing wrong with a bit of 'friendly' aggression. I'd hope big Reece earned a bit of respect of his own. Good on the lad.
That's all fine BT but what exactly has he done on the field to warrant any genuine respect from his teammates?
Don't doubt he's a great bloke, clubman etc but perhaps that's been part of our issue in the past when striving to be elite in the competition?
Question, do you think Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell or Roughhead would respect Ty if he were at the Hawks? Would he still be there? I also hope the rumour is true as we need kids to challenge the so called leaders at our club
Mate he has played nearly 100 games of AFL footy and kicked 100 goals. That's more than 99.9% of everybody you/we know. It doesn't really matter what you think of him, the coaches of our footy club obviously rate him and respect him otherwise he would be on our list. You don't know how hard he trains or what extra work he may do, all things that get respect off coaches and teammates.
And to answer your question on the Hawthorn boys, I don't really care what they think.
I don't disagree with anything there although comparing yourself to (or in) the benchmark team in the competition gives context as to where you sit and how far you need to come in order to be a success in the competition.
I hope Ty gets to 200 games and his on field output starts to resemble the consistency required to be remembered as a very good AFL player.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #146 on: January 04, 2015, 10:06:57 PM »
If true(and I hope it is), good on the kid - need more of the kids stepping up and challenging the senior blokes every step of the way

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #147 on: January 04, 2015, 10:49:13 PM »
at 196 cm he is too short to ruck, from the highlights he is a stay at home full forward or CHF. Good luck to Reece hope he makes it.
and that is exactly what we want. a bloke who may become a very good stay at home kpf.a bloke capable of exclusively playing kpf. ive argued we have not had  that with vickery or griffiths as neither have shown after 6 and 5 yrs respectively that they can play kp exclusively.they may yet prove me wrong but id sure like to spread the eggs to other baskets.

genuine power fwd size, freakin quick so will be hard to stop on the lead, takes a contested grab consistently, has very good agility for a bloke his size and he kicks goals.
not sure what other recruiters didnt like if it was nothing more than poor interview then they all have rocks in their heads.

my understanding of why he may have slipped a little bit was, he had not done too much against the better sides and better players.
i think for a pick in the 70s he is a great pick. we need to give more talls chances with these late and rookie picks.

i still advocate at least one more tall fwd on our list,
even if i include mcbean vickery griffiths with riewoldt and mckenzie there really is room for one more tall fwd, the type that is missing is the gunston crameri mayne lynch type imo.

vickery and griffiths to justify all the faith really do need to take their games to another level.there are no more excuses.
Agree with all of this.

Pick 77 should always go to high risk - high reward type players. No point playing safe there.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #148 on: January 05, 2015, 11:36:46 PM »
Reece tweeted that it was great to be back at preseason training today. So he's keen and enjoying himself.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Pick 77. Reece McKenzie
« Reply #149 on: January 06, 2015, 05:06:37 PM »
Rumours circulating that McKenzie and Cox are good mates and Cox may of contacted him earlier that day