Author Topic: Richmond Sign Andrew Moore as FA 1 yr deal (official) [merged]  (Read 25992 times)

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5412
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #90 on: October 31, 2015, 02:07:25 PM »
Does he suit Richmond because he fades in and out of games or because he has questionable foot skills?

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19457
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #91 on: October 31, 2015, 02:17:51 PM »
Both.....also can't get a game for Port....which meets another RFC criteria...
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98423
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #92 on: October 31, 2015, 06:19:47 PM »
ANDREW MOORE

WE NEVER truly saw the best of Moore at Port Adelaide, which cut the 189cm midfielder from its list last week after playing 55 games over six years. Taken at pick 9 in the 2009 national draft, Moore struggled to cement his spot in Port’s senior side over the past two seasons, with suspension and shoulder injuries not helping his cause. But the first-round pick, who averaged 21 disposals per game in the SANFL this year, could be a valuable asset to a club needing a tall inside midfielder to help out at stoppages. Richmond, which has already met with Moore, could desperately do with someone like him.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/afl-delistings-2015-14-players-with-more-to-give-and-could-be-given-second-chance/story-e6frf3e3-1227589072677

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #93 on: October 31, 2015, 06:35:48 PM »
Happy he's played 55 games. If he's serious about turning his career around and there is alot more to his ability, he should have had enough tog to rapidly improve and make an impact
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #94 on: October 31, 2015, 06:52:51 PM »
since 1999 only one top 10 pick that has been delisted has been picked up by another club and had anything remotely resembling a successful career. That was kepler bradley and remotely resembling a successful career is probably being rather generous.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19457
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #95 on: October 31, 2015, 07:22:04 PM »
Tambling kicked a nice goal in his last game for Adelaide....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #96 on: October 31, 2015, 08:21:23 PM »
Happy he's played 55 games. If he's serious about turning his career around and there is alot more to his ability, he should have had enough tog to rapidly improve and make an impact

Yep. :thumbsup
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #97 on: November 01, 2015, 09:29:17 AM »
since 1999 only one top 10 pick that has been delisted has been picked up by another club and had anything remotely resembling a successful career. That was kepler bradley and remotely resembling a successful career is probably being rather generous.
How many top 10 picks have been delisted though?

We even managed to trade Tambling, a very reasonable deal at that!

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #98 on: November 01, 2015, 09:34:03 AM »
a couple or thereabouts each year.
strike rate for top 10 picks goes at around 60-70%

not sure what trading out a player has to do with the odds of a delisted player coming good?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #99 on: November 01, 2015, 09:38:14 AM »
a couple or thereabouts each year.
strike rate for top 10 picks goes at around 60-70%

not sure what trading out a player has to do with the odds of a delisted player coming good?

I meant that its rare top 10 picks get delisted, they'll always have trade value. So whilst the stats say he's unlikely to make it, its not really fair to say best case scenario is a poor mans Keplar Bradly.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #100 on: November 01, 2015, 09:44:58 AM »
i said nothing about best case scenario, just about chances of him coming good.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14059
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #101 on: November 01, 2015, 01:13:43 PM »
Bradley.  :lol how bad was that draft albert. To think that the blues actually gave up a first rounder for a spud like mclean is incredible.

odds of moore coming good are very long but for one year why not. Lucky boy will most likely end up with 3 yrs.



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19457
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #102 on: November 01, 2015, 01:36:34 PM »
If Hunt can play every match and get a two year extension then anything's possible....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #103 on: November 01, 2015, 03:13:10 PM »
since 1999 only one top 10 pick that has been delisted has been picked up by another club and had anything remotely resembling a successful career. That was kepler bradley and remotely resembling a successful career is probably being rather generous.
How many top 10 picks have been delisted though?

We even managed to trade Tambling, a very reasonable deal at that!

Good question
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Moore Please / Richmond interested in Port's Andrew Moore [merged]
« Reply #104 on: November 01, 2015, 03:18:39 PM »
of which i have answered
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI