Author Topic: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?  (Read 6370 times)

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2015, 10:14:10 AM »
dgoey, moore, aish

 :P
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #16 on: November 21, 2015, 10:22:35 AM »
a lot of if,  buts and maybes rating the pies list, there's just as much chance those remaining go the same way as fizzers in Kennedy, Freeman and sharenburg that haven't fired a shot. Aish :lol

Meanwhile back at Tigerland we have an establishment of AA calibre talent all signed to long term deals , no ifs , buts or maybe s , they're superstars

read and weep collingwood :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13532
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #17 on: November 21, 2015, 10:47:07 AM »
I think they have done a great job over the last 3 or 4 years to stockpile young talent while offloading some of their more experienced players for one reason or another, that had taken them as far as they could.
They have been brave in doing this and Buckley has taken a hit over it. It shows me he is willing to make tough decisions that aren't always going to be popular ones. Could we say the same about Hardwick?
But it's one thing to draft potentially good kids but it's another for them to become good/great players. It's a risk they took and IMO it will pay off.

Is their list better than ours?
Not at the moment obviously as we have played finals the last 3 years and they haven't but things can change pretty quickly and we had better start getting more brave with our trading or we could get overtaken really quickly.
We also need to start playing our young talent and moving on the Grigg's, Houli's, Hunt's and Chaplin's of the club. They have taken us as far as they are going to.

It's not to say I don't hate them though but Essendon clearly have my most hated club at the minute with North a close second.

well said mate  :clapping

couldnt agree more.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #18 on: November 21, 2015, 07:17:25 PM »
would chaplin and griggy get a game for collingwood?

if not, why are they stalwarts in the hardwick flag winning plan?
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #19 on: November 23, 2015, 03:28:19 PM »
Scharenberg does an ACL. Is this a timely reminder about the risks of picking up injury prone players or is it just plain bad luck for the kid and Collingwood?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-11-23/young-pie-scharenberg-requires-another-knee-reconstruction
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #20 on: November 23, 2015, 03:34:02 PM »
acl is pretty bad luck ...
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17865
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2015, 04:12:14 PM »
Sympathies to the player - suck shyte to the club....
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2016, 12:25:25 PM »
Treloar tweaked his groin at training this morning, on SEN and Rob Waters just tweeted this.

Wouldn't have happened at Richmond  :whistle :whistle

https://twitter.com/RobWaters10?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17865
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2016, 01:57:07 PM »
Suck shyte.
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2016, 07:29:15 PM »
Karma tool cram it and jam it. That's how it goes  :gotigers
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2016, 10:10:12 AM »
Paper is Paper

Smashing them on the MCG is the only proof to me. Too much talk.
Flex the muscle & just smash them. GET IT DONE no excuses

 :gotigers

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3865
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2016, 07:10:07 PM »
Collingwood.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2016, 07:27:42 PM »
Collingwood.

yep I agree
Also, they have been able to offload average players for quality pick or players
we fail to offload anything let alone build up a rep for player then offload
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2016, 07:37:46 PM »
Collingwood.

yep I agree
Also, they have been able to offload average players for quality pick or players
we fail to offload anything let alone build up a rep for player then offload

They did a full rebuild

We did a half assed money ball list blocker rebuild
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5004
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Richmond v Collingwood: Who has the better list?
« Reply #29 on: March 21, 2016, 07:45:14 PM »
Not sure I buy the Collingwood hype. Their midfield is nice but to me they look very vulnerable or at least unproven at the ends of the ground.