McBean and non-selection

[yellowandback]

We overthink Ty, I'm not sure he's that good.
It's almost like that episode of Seinfeld where Kramer is accidentally asked to a meeting and ends up "working" for the company.

[tony_montana]

so what message does it send if you're telling a player he needs to improve his workrate and then you reward him with a senior selection despite not improving on that?

on one hand people spew on vickery because he is lazy and plays without intensity, yet scream blue murder because he isnt being replaced with a bloke, who from many accounts this season, has exactly the same issue.

we just end up with the same poo in a different bucket.

probably the same message being sent to Ty? wh is it ok for him to be rewarded for 7 years? asking for 5-6 weeks is not asking too much imo

[Yeahright]

Bad habits are already instilled in Ty. I also think despite him being lazy he adds a bit of structure and although he's no where good enough of a mark for a KPF (he probably is actually - just doesn't try it enough) he at least is still a threat to take one. Not sure McBean is to be honest, and I don't think he's athleticism will let him kick as many goals in the AFL as he gets away with in the VFL

[tony_montana]

maybe, but we'll never know if we dont try it