Author Topic: Richmond list is unbalanced, what is most concerning area of list deficiency?  (Read 1947 times)

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
From our list of 46 our largest deficiecy is our bottom 34 players.
IMO  we have the worst list in the AFL.

OUR list managers should be sacked immediately, they have noconcept of buiding a list and should be sued for negligence and incompetence.
We don't "sack" any person at the Stability-Centre because we are all one big happy family.
Look, Hampsud is a great asset to our team and we have full confidence in him as an elite ruck, we don't need anymore players because we have excellent depth of talent all training like no one has ever trained before banging the door down for senior selection.  :rollin
Therefore we will give jobs for life to our most loyal & hardworking of club assets in Blair & Jackson for steering us through the most difficult era in drafting history.... :blah :chuck :blah



Just don't mention how good any other team has done it.....  :shh
:clapping :clapping :clapping :lol :lol :lol :bow

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
There should be a rule made of this forum that anyone posting photo's of JON be banned for 1 month Diocletian  :snidegrin


who agrees  ;D

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
JON & Wallace actually.... :gotigers
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.