Author Topic: Changes for the Port game?  (Read 4336 times)

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2016, 01:57:43 PM »
Vickery should be shot.



Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'

If the kind of "comments " coming over the fence - from Richmond supporters are reflective of the post Andyy just put up...can you blame him .
Unleash the tornado

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2016, 02:09:22 PM »
Vickery should be shot.



Honestly we should all conspire together. Nothing lethal, maybe just a toe or something so he can never play again.


Or maybe he's been told he won't be offered a contract?

Hes playing like he knows hes going to be moved to another club.

More bronx cheers yesterday and that look at the crowd when he kicked the goal was like 'eff you lot'

If the kind of "comments " coming over the fence - from Richmond supporters are reflective of the post Andyy just put up...can you blame him .

I have no position other than hes supposed to be a professional athlete, hes a poo player, and the sooner hes gone the better.

"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2016, 03:27:49 PM »
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #18 on: June 26, 2016, 03:35:29 PM »
Outs: Martin too much fancy kicks
         Cotchin cannot kick a goal with a set shot
         Rance, Stefan Martin owned him in the last
         Jack kicked 4.4 and just doesn't do enough with his opportunities.
         Hampson if injured

Ins:   Moore can replace Martin against his old side
         Batchelor is a clear like for like with Cotch
         Chappy for Rance is the obvious choice
         Griff for Jack
         Ivan for Hammer


 

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #19 on: June 26, 2016, 03:37:22 PM »
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler

Jack has 8 shots at goal and kicks 4.4 wtf.
Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.
Jack should be traded for a mars bar and a small egg flip Big M.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2016, 06:54:55 PM »

Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.

I know you are trolling but this is actually completely incorrect :lol

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98400
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Maric in line to replace injured Tiger Hampson (afl site)
« Reply #21 on: June 27, 2016, 02:15:53 PM »
Maric in line to replace injured Tiger Hampson

Nathan Schmook and Nat Edwards 
AFL.com.au
June 27, 2016



OUT-OF-FAVOUR ruckman Ivan Maric looms as a likely replacement for Richmond big man Shaun Hampson in Friday night's clash against Port Adelaide after being withdrawn from the VFL on Sunday.

Hampson suffered a right knee injury in Saturday's clash against the Brisbane Lions, limping from the field in the final three minutes after landing awkwardly on his knee in a ruck contest.

Given the Tigers' six-day break – and a five-day break for players pushing their case in the VFL – Maric was withdrawn on Sunday and could be called on to play his first AFL game in two months.

Maric, the Tigers' joint vice-captain, has been overtaken by Hampson this season after a back injury held him back in the early rounds.

He is yet to find his best form in the VFL and has not played at any level in two weeks given the Tigers' VFL bye in round 13.

Despite the short turnaround, Hampson was confident he would be fit to face the Power on Friday night.

He told AFL.com.au on Sunday morning he was unlikely to need a scan on his knee, and was optimistic about his chances of playing the Power in six days' time.

"It's not too bad," Hampson said.

"I just stirred up an existing injury, so it won't be an issue, I don't think.

"I just landed a bit awkwardly and stirred the medial up. The short break doesn’t help, but I think I'll be good."

The former Blue has been in career-best form, cementing himself as Richmond's No.1 ruckman over the past two months.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-06-27/shaun-hampson-confident-of-being-fit-to-face-port-adelaide

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #22 on: June 27, 2016, 02:34:35 PM »

Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.

I know you are trolling but this is actually completely incorrect :lol

yep he was trying to pass it - woah, even when he's not having a ping he nails them  :snidegrin

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98400
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #23 on: June 27, 2016, 02:40:33 PM »
The Barometer - Round 15

Herald-Sun
27 June 2016


RICHMOND

ON THE BLOCK: Shaun Hampson limped off in the closing minutes with a sore right knee, but Damien Hardwick was confident he would be fine. Hardwick also defended Ty Vickery, who while creating chances for others, failed to cash in on his side’s dominance up the ground and was again quiet. Nathan Broad and Jacob Townsend came were late inclusions, with the former on debut the more impressive.

ON THE CUSP: Ben Griffiths pulled out of the side on Friday night with a virus before Jake Batchelor did the same on the morning of the match. Both will be fit to take on Port Adelaide on Friday night.

SAM EDMUND’S VERDICT: If a win has told us any less about a side we would be amazed. Distinctly average against an abysmal Brisbane Lions outfit, but average was enough to secure the win. Speaking of wins, that’s five of the last six and Tigers fans will be starting to believe all over again. But Port Adelaide is up next across the border, which promises to provide a far more accurate gauge of exactly where this side is at. Is it just a mid-table battler or are we witnessing another late-season surge?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/footy-form/the-barometer-how-do-your-clubs-playing-stocks-look-after-round-14/news-story/bbc7f42442f66f19e94818a33e1691c2

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98400
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #24 on: June 28, 2016, 03:58:51 AM »
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8466
  • In Absentia
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #25 on: June 28, 2016, 09:36:21 AM »
Hunt is a chicken footballer. Vickery should dominate against opposition like Brisbane. Its time to get rid of Vickery in the trade. Trade Astbury also as  he has NFI & is another Hunt. Bellis  = one of the worst AFL players l have ever seen. reminds me of a lazy Chris Tarrant who got a wake up call when he thought he was untouchable from selectors.

Out; Astbury, Vickery, Hunt, Bellis Hampson

In; Rioli, Griffiths, Maric, C. Ellis. Butler

Jack has 8 shots at goal and kicks 4.4 wtf.
Vickery has 1 and nails it. Vickery is the man.
Jack should be traded for a mars bar and a small egg flip Big M.

 :lol
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13309
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #26 on: June 28, 2016, 11:11:03 AM »
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.

Normally plays at 25/75 so thats a bonus

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #27 on: June 28, 2016, 11:17:45 AM »
Hampson is just 50/50 to play according to Mark Stevens on Ch 7 last night.

75/25 to fake injury when he is gettin beaten
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #28 on: June 28, 2016, 04:08:38 PM »
25% fit Hampson is better than a 100% Maric.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #29 on: June 28, 2016, 04:41:03 PM »
IN:

McBean, Griffiths, Rioli, C.Ellis

OUT:

Townsend, Vickery, Broad, Lambert

Team v Port Adelaide

B: Hunt, Rance, Grimes

HB: Vlastuin, Astbury, Short

C: C.Ellis, Martin, B.Ellis

HF: Deledio, Griffiths, Edwards

F: Rioli, Riewoldt, McBean

R: Hampson, Cotchin, Miles

I: Grigg, Lloyd, Menadue, Conca