Author Topic: The doggies blueprint  (Read 15745 times)

naturaldisaster

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #30 on: September 25, 2016, 07:07:04 PM »
It's good to see that a club can concentrate on the political aspect of corporate society, as well as have a succesful footy team.

That alone makes my point.

Just don't kid yourselves that women are necessary in the top roles.
Statistically qualified ? Unquestionably!

If it wasn't for all the pc rubbish peer pressure from damaged goods nobody would even GAF if they weren't involved.

As for your women's league.... Good stuff.

lmao

your sexist rubbish belongs in another era

Don't get me wrong, I do not want society to go into the path of employing women/blacks or whatever just for the sake of PC, you should have the most qualified person no matter what.

But to say that women are unqualified for any position and don't belong in the afl simply cos they are women really says something about you as a human being.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #31 on: September 25, 2016, 07:10:17 PM »
You would be surprised what can happen when you have ALL coaches and support staff on the same page lead by a great teacher/leader. Everyone at that mob are on the same page and they play for each other, care for each other, support each other, so on and so on......

All of the new line coaches coming in MUST support each other and believe the messages they are passing on are real and can make us successful. Now with most of the line coaches who gave mixed messages to the players are gone this should be seen as a new opportunity to move forward together.....like the dogs are right now!

So every thing was the fault of the assistants and Hardwick is lily white.

Do you work for the RFC?


Haha!  no I don't. Are you in charge of staff? If you are, you would know it is very hard setting standards and procedures (in this case game style etc.) when middle management (in this case line coaches) don't always support decisions and instruct people under them to do thing differently. Hardwick has his faults but what i am saying is it is a great opportunity to bring in people who will work together in totality....like the dogs right now!     

So youre basically saying dimma has been undermined and its the fault of the assistants - is this your take on it or have you heard this?


Both :thumbsup
Who's "blueprint to success" is it?

The game plan is Dumma Halfsteps baby. He or no one else can blame the assistants for keeping close to the boundary consistent backwards, sideways, two steps backwards to go forwards game plan.

The assistants must instruct the forwards to lead to the pockets to force stoppages and wonder why we can't score.
The assistants must instruct the backs to kick to the boundary to force a stoppage just to see the ball repeatedly come back over the players heads.
The midfielders are instructed to go to the wings or backwards or to the boundary to force stoppages, to use slow ball movement to control possession or to kick to the pockets when kicking inside 50.
The assistants are instructing the whole team to corral an opponent rather than tackle them because "we're just not a tackling team".

The assistants must instruct the players to do all this whilst knowing the successful teams are brutal at the contest, taking the game on using fast ball movement, using the corridor at every opportunity to get the ball forward quickly with all out attack, smashing the opponents with immense pressure and fierce tackling at all times whilst helping and assisting each other at all times by shepherding, blocking & bumping.

The assistants must do all this because Hardwick has the "BLUEPRINTTOSUCCESS" game plan & most importantly he has the characteristics & attributes to be a premiership coach. :clapping :gotigers :clapping
The club that keeps giving.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #32 on: September 25, 2016, 07:33:10 PM »
so bitter and twisted I kinda hope the swans win and that disappoints me.....
stuff you Richond

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #33 on: September 25, 2016, 07:33:48 PM »
So many AFL clubs are just using their VFL side as a team to park their kids and just as a tool to get minutes into players. Bulldogs seem lately to be using their team to teach these sorts how to win and then they carry that attitude into the seniors. They have got so many players that would be deadset plodders in any other side. Just goes to show how far a team can go with a coach who can get the most out of his players and a team that has a genuine crack.

I can't stand them and was filthy when it came down to quack McLean with his wobbly knees, shrugging the shoulders with 2 minutes to go, but credit where it's due considering their injury list, inexperience and travelling time through the finals they refused to lie down. I just hope they don't win next week for no other reason than I don't know any Sydney supporters and the Bulldogs ones I know have been intolerable of late.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #34 on: September 25, 2016, 07:57:40 PM »
It's good to see that a club can concentrate on the political aspect of corporate society, as well as have a succesful footy team.

That alone makes my point.

Just don't kid yourselves that women are necessary in the top roles.
Statistically qualified ? Unquestionably!

If it wasn't for all the pc rubbish peer pressure from damaged goods nobody would even GAF if they weren't involved.

As for your women's league.... Good stuff.

lmao

your sexist rubbish belongs in another era

Don't get me wrong, I do not want society to go into the path of employing women/blacks or whatever just for the sake of PC, you should have the most qualified person no matter what.

But to say that women are unqualified for any position and don't belong in the afl simply cos they are women really says something about you as a human being.



 :chuck



and if anyone can assemble an all female board with kick arse women wih the right vision to run our poohole club,
I'd back them all the way.
Instead we have an American, mid western lawyer wih nfi.

Caracella and Balmey.

naturaldisaster

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #35 on: September 25, 2016, 08:19:44 PM »
...yet you posted that women are unqualified for any position.

you weren't just criticising peggy.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #36 on: September 25, 2016, 08:35:26 PM »
Hey sweetcheeks, would u like to call me more names?


Caracella and Balmey.

naturaldisaster

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #37 on: September 25, 2016, 08:50:09 PM »
Hey sweetcheeks, would u like to call me more names?



Nice mate, but I am male.

you can say what you like about peggy, just don't be sexist toward women in general.


anyway, back to the topic.

We could also use the doggie blue print of the late 90s

Came second last in '96, made a prelim the next year :D

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #38 on: September 25, 2016, 08:58:15 PM »
Lol. What a wanka.
Caracella and Balmey.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #39 on: September 25, 2016, 09:08:22 PM »
It's good to see that a club can concentrate on the political aspect of corporate society, as well as have a succesful footy team.

That alone makes my point.

Just don't kid yourselves that women are necessary in the top roles.
Statistically qualified ? Unquestionably!

If it wasn't for all the pc rubbish peer pressure from damaged goods nobody would even GAF if they weren't involved.

As for your women's league.... Good stuff.



your sexist rubbish belongs in another era

.
Right you are...The coming era where feminism and PC in general is treated with the disdain it deserves.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #40 on: September 25, 2016, 09:13:23 PM »
You would be surprised what can happen when you have ALL coaches and support staff on the same page lead by a great teacher/leader. Everyone at that mob are on the same page and they play for each other, care for each other, support each other, so on and so on......

All of the new line coaches coming in MUST support each other and believe the messages they are passing on are real and can make us successful. Now with most of the line coaches who gave mixed messages to the players are gone this should be seen as a new opportunity to move forward together.....like the dogs are right now!

So every thing was the fault of the assistants and Hardwick is lily white.

Do you work for the RFC?


Haha!  no I don't. Are you in charge of staff? If you are, you would know it is very hard setting standards and procedures (in this case game style etc.) when middle management (in this case line coaches) don't always support decisions and instruct people under them to do thing differently. Hardwick has his faults but what i am saying is it is a great opportunity to bring in people who will work together in totality....like the dogs right now!     

So youre basically saying dimma has been undermined and its the fault of the assistants - is this your take on it or have you heard this?


Both :thumbsup

I dont buy it, reckon its a cop out and the only reason dimma is still there is bc our brains trust had a brain fart and signed him up to a 2 year extension and thus we cant afford the payout. But proof will be in the pudding I guess - we'll see how long he lasts with a new coaching team behind him

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #41 on: September 25, 2016, 10:31:23 PM »
I like how their handballs are used to put players in better positions and they don't poo themselves. We just like to put our teammates under more pressure until they inevitably pee their pants 

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #42 on: September 25, 2016, 10:44:56 PM »
I like how their handballs are used to put players in better positions and they don't poo themselves. We just like to put our teammates under more pressure until they inevitably pee their pants
Their hands in close are the best I've seen.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #43 on: September 26, 2016, 08:13:51 AM »
It's pretty simple really.

If you are coached to play a game with intense physical pressure, then you also become good at dealing with that pressure, due to constantly being exposed to it at training.

If you are not constantly exposed to that sort of pressure at training, then you will wilt under it when it is applied during a game.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Tiger Tragic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: The doggies blueprint
« Reply #44 on: September 26, 2016, 08:26:22 AM »
The doggies blueprint v the Tigers brownprint. Think I know which one wins.