Author Topic: Trade targets 2017  (Read 216092 times)

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1185 on: October 19, 2017, 02:56:37 PM »
Great to see some negativity coming back to this forum, all this back slapping about winning the premiership was starting to make things a bit boring. :thumbsup

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1186 on: October 19, 2017, 02:59:11 PM »
Getting Lynch next year should help ease the pain.... :shh




"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1187 on: October 19, 2017, 03:06:18 PM »
If they get naish for 25 when he woulda gone pick 13ish, and we only drop 2 spots in the draft, its probably an okay trade. Perhaps they feel their pick 15 target will slide anyway.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1188 on: October 19, 2017, 03:14:22 PM »
can i just say i dont give a flying stuff who they pick up this year.

next year perhaps but this year im happy to sit back, put the feet up, continue to give poo to all other supporters i know throughout the summer, whilst i try and drink that great/rude draught beer

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1189 on: October 19, 2017, 03:32:19 PM »
I want more flags damn it......got the taste now....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1190 on: October 19, 2017, 03:46:09 PM »
Wonder if we have our eye on any DFA's? A few talls out there.... Spencer, Jacksh, Keefe, Griffin.......Hansen...........Clarke......

"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1191 on: October 19, 2017, 03:50:03 PM »
Anyone else disappointing we didn't end up with Schache?

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1192 on: October 19, 2017, 03:51:52 PM »
You have to remember to if we have to match a bid with 17 pick 20 will come down a few spots because of remaining points if not we gain 3 picks in top 25 instead of 2 we had,one for Naish that is smart trading.I trust Balme our trade period worked well last year.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1193 on: October 19, 2017, 03:54:38 PM »
Anyone else disappointing we didn't end up with Schache?

Schache - not really, Stringer - yes....

....and although not that annoyed about it... considering Melbourne only gave up pick 66 for Balic, also thought we could've offered one of our a picks in the 50's (and maybe Conca too) for him...
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1194 on: October 19, 2017, 04:03:17 PM »
So many clubs turned of Schache for a reason him and his management handling was poor we got burned with Yarran to.
Miles is good depth and may improve to.Go go the draft get two talls I'm happy.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1195 on: October 19, 2017, 04:06:36 PM »
Pretty sure we turned off Schache cause his manager did a few things that really pee'd us off. Signing a contract mid year and then asking for 400k did the trick.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1196 on: October 19, 2017, 04:07:04 PM »
Why clubs traded picks but not players

Callum Twomey 
afl.com.au
October 19, 2017 3:33 PM


THE FINAL day flurry of trades also included some deals that only involved draft picks without any players involved.

Here is our understanding of why those deals went down, as clubs eye extra points for this year's draft and next year's intake with father-son and academy picks coming through.   

The trade

    The Brisbane Lions receive a first-round draft selection (No.15 at the time of trade) and third-round draft selection (No.52 at the time of trade).
    Richmond receives a second-round draft selection (No.20 at the time of trade) and on-traded second-round draft selection (No.25 at the time of trade).

Why?
This is likely to revolve around the prospects both clubs have available at this year's draft. By trading back their first pick, the Tigers now have No.17, 20 and 25 at their disposal – and a bid for father-son Patrick Naish seems likely to fall in that range. By moving up, the Lions could get their picks in before a bid comes for academy tall Connor Ballenden, meaning they can just use later selections to match that bid.

------------------------------

The trade

    Geelong receives a future third-round draft selection.
    Richmond receives a third-round draft selection (No.53 at the time of trade).

Why?
The father-sons have to come into the clubs' thinking in this deal. Richmond has Naish – a wiry but talented midfielder from the Northern Knights – coming through this season and he could attract a top-20 bid. The Cats have Oscar Brownless, the son of Billy, eligible to join as a father-son pick next year.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-19/swap-central-why-clubs-traded-picks-but-not-players

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1197 on: October 19, 2017, 04:09:30 PM »
Tigers boost 2017 draft options

richmondfc.com.au 
October 19, 2017 3:16 PM


Richmond completed two deals on the final day of the AFL’s 2017 trade period, both involving an exchange of picks with other league clubs in the upcoming national draft.

The Tigers received two second-round picks from Brisbane – No. 20 and No. 25 – in return for their first pick, No. 15, and a third-round selection, No. 52.

And the Club sent its 2018 third-round pick to Geelong in return for the Cats’ third-round selection this year, No. 53.

Richmond now has picks 17, 20, 25, 53, 55, 74, 92 and 110 in the 2017 national draft, which will take place on Friday, November 24 in Sydney.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2017-10-19/tigers-boost-2017-draft-options

Offline The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3697
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1198 on: October 19, 2017, 04:10:00 PM »
Anyone else disappointing we didn't end up with Schache?


No

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #1199 on: October 19, 2017, 04:10:45 PM »
.Go go the draft get two talls I'm happy.

Will there be any decent talls left in the 20's?

I'm hoping we can at least grab Tom McCartin and I've heard he's on our radar, not sure he's worth a second rounder at this stage but he may not be there at 53 either....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.