Author Topic: Split from Clarko thread  (Read 286 times)

Offline ())(

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8373
  • Dimalaka
Split from Clarko thread
« on: February 03, 2017, 05:31:27 PM »
Can't believe my comment was removed.  ::)

It was fact as presented through the major news and media.

So tell me - wtf!
I cant believe it, 1.20 to go, youre three points up and there is nobody at the back end of the square for a quick kick in for the opposition.

I just cant believe my eyes.

Its poor leadership and its poor coaching from the Richmond Football Club.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10263
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2017, 05:46:14 PM »
Can't believe my comment was removed.  ::)

It was fact as presented through the major news and media.

So tell me - wtf!
Certainly didnt break site rules.
 
Was factual and no swearing. Not even risque.

My tip is the meek do gooders were triggered and the report button got mashed in faux offense.

Snowflakes against free speech.

Your next comment

Offline ())(

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8373
  • Dimalaka
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2017, 05:52:23 PM »
Right. :clapping
Best to ignore the Snakes in society, eh?
Just pretend he's not there type stuff.  :thumbsdown
I cant believe it, 1.20 to go, youre three points up and there is nobody at the back end of the square for a quick kick in for the opposition.

I just cant believe my eyes.

Its poor leadership and its poor coaching from the Richmond Football Club.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 30488
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2017, 06:35:35 PM »
Can't believe my comment was removed.  ::)

It was fact as presented through the major news and media.

So tell me - wtf!
Certainly didnt break site rules.
 
Was factual and no swearing. Not even risque.

My tip is the meek do gooders were triggered and the report button got mashed in faux offense.

Snowflakes against free speech.

You are wrong. It wasn't  reported

It was removed because of 2 posts after it that quoted it were well ... lower than the gutter and offensive.

Decided to remove all of it so that sort of stuff wasn't repeated and people stuck to the topic
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10263
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2017, 06:55:26 PM »
Can't believe my comment was removed.  ::)

It was fact as presented through the major news and media.

So tell me - wtf!
Certainly didnt break site rules.
 
Was factual and no swearing. Not even risque.

My tip is the meek do gooders were triggered and the report button got mashed in faux offense.

Snowflakes against free speech.

You are wrong. It wasn't  reported

It was removed because of 2 posts after it that quoted it were well ... lower than the gutter and offensive.

Decided to remove all of it so that sort of stuff wasn't repeated and people stuck to the topic

Ill say this - with respect, if you delete one more thing which falls inside the site rules and which is factual, without amending site rules on posting, then youll have a mutiny.

If theres captains calls on appropriateness which sit outside the rules, post the parameters. How do we know where the line is if you dont know?

Your choice. Please. Be clear with what you expect and communicate like an adult instead of being under prepared and reactive.

Really dissapointing.





« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 07:37:55 PM by Dookie »
Your next comment

Offline ())(

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8373
  • Dimalaka
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2017, 08:09:33 PM »
I'm not fussed no it's been explained.

Doesn't mean I agree with the method Tho
I cant believe it, 1.20 to go, youre three points up and there is nobody at the back end of the square for a quick kick in for the opposition.

I just cant believe my eyes.

Its poor leadership and its poor coaching from the Richmond Football Club.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 30488
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2017, 09:48:19 PM »


Ill say this - with respect, if you delete one more thing which falls inside the site rules and which is factual, without amending site rules on posting, then youll have a mutiny.

If theres captains calls on appropriateness which sit outside the rules, post the parameters. How do we know where the line is if you dont know?

Your choice. Please. Be clear with what you expect and communicate like an adult instead of being under prepared and reactive.

Really dissapointing.

Suggest you have a read of the 3 strikes policy thread. In particular the bit about crude comments. Think it's pretty clear

Crude comments are not on, that's why the posts were removed. When they go as low as to degrade genders then it isn't a captains call as you put it. It is following what was laid out under the 2 strikes policy

So instead of whacking me, why don't you whack others who took a fair measured post and used it to post degrading comments.

The only thing that I concede was a captain's call was removing Ox's post. But based on the other posts that used it to create gutter talk and where the discussion was heading I removed it
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10263
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Split from Clarko thread
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2017, 10:42:03 PM »


Ill say this - with respect, if you delete one more thing which falls inside the site rules and which is factual, without amending site rules on posting, then youll have a mutiny.

If theres captains calls on appropriateness which sit outside the rules, post the parameters. How do we know where the line is if you dont know?

Your choice. Please. Be clear with what you expect and communicate like an adult instead of being under prepared and reactive.

Really dissapointing.

Suggest you have a read of the 3 strikes policy thread. In particular the bit about crude comments. Think it's pretty clear

Crude comments are not on, that's why the posts were removed. When they go as low as to degrade genders then it isn't a captains call as you put it. It is following what was laid out under the 2 strikes policy

So instead of whacking me, why don't you whack others who took a fair measured post and used it to post degrading comments.

The only thing that I concede was a captain's call was removing Ox's post. But based on the other posts that used it to create gutter talk and where the discussion was heading I removed it

Your original post didnt explain or differentiate as this most recent post.

I cant whack what i havent read - ive assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that what i have indeed read was unnesseceraly censored.

I trust each gender is treated with equal levels of responsibility and sensitivity. 

I accept your version in good faith.

Sorry, transparency and open communication is important.


Your next comment