Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 1820 times)

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6692
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Biggest sooky little babies?
« on: October 09, 2017, 06:46:36 PM »
Give your 5-1 but vote your biggest sook

Me

Geelong supporters
Adelaide
Geelong
All other supporters
Adelaide supporters


They are all biatches stuff them all

Premiers baby

Offline Dougeytherichmondfan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1969
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2017, 06:52:30 PM »
1. Geel supporters
2. Chris Scott
3. Brad Scott
4. Geelong
5. The rest.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9765
  • In Blake We Trust
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2017, 07:02:26 PM »
North supporters

Geelong Supporters

Adelaide supporters

Chris Scott

Bents - still bitching on Big Footy about Grigg.... apparently we would've won the  Grand Final by
12 goals if Markov had played instead... :shh


p.s. there's already a thread about this:

http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=27069.0

[chucky]please merge[/chucky]

If you disagree with a fanatic, they will automatically assume you are a competing flavor of fanatic.

- Jim Goad

Offline Dougeytherichmondfan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1969
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2017, 07:16:18 PM »
I have a query of nomenclature.

Is sooking the same as being salty?

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2017, 07:41:11 PM »
We have been everyone's "Paul Pfeiffer " for years - now people are losing their #$@! because we made the school basketball team .
Unleash the tornado

Online Slipper

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2017, 08:04:47 PM »
We are Geelong, the biggest sooks of all
We are Geelong, we always go the bawl


Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10265
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2017, 08:21:21 PM »
Norf
Your next comment

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6692
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2017, 10:30:13 AM »
Forgot about Norf, thats how insignificant they are stuff them

Online tony_montana

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9920
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2017, 01:57:06 PM »
Had forgotten that geelong were such squealers. One loss in 10 years and look at them go

Offline Yeahright

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9213
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2017, 04:51:02 PM »
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success? The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2017, 05:17:50 PM »
Geebung supporters
Norf Supporters
Geebung
Adelaide Supporters
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 60636
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2017, 06:32:02 PM »
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3794
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2017, 10:02:23 PM »
Someone tell Tex that minor premiers don't count .
Unleash the tornado

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2335
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2017, 10:47:41 PM »
Need Tex on this list

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-10/lever-has-chosen-money-over-success-tex

And someone needs to ask him what success?
The same success that Jenkins claimed to Dangerfield? :lol
Jimmy Bartel did today. Said Tex can't talk about success as he hasn't achieved any. Whack!  ;D

Actually, it's all starting to backfire on Walker. People in Adelaide now openly questioning whether he's fit to remain captain given his "juvenile" outburst towards Lever.


Honestly, his performance was crap. Bad day at the office, it happens.

His post-game speech was garbage. I can forgive that because he was upset and I wanted hit ugly face to FO the stage.

But even commenting at all on Lever is seriously poor. This is a time when you go the cliches and pretend you don't mine, kind of like how coaches pretend they haven't seen footage of their own players punching blokes on the field and can't comment on whether or not is warrants suspension.


Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.

Online Slipper

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2017, 11:57:50 PM »
Seriously all jokes aside I don't think Tex should be captain of that club. Guy is a genuine thug, finger-pointer and sore loser.

Quite true. He'd be more suited to Collingwood.