Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 243322 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1125 on: February 12, 2023, 04:12:34 AM »
Quote from: Brent King
Kingy , I just couldn’t cope with another Richmond flag . I just can’t bear the thought of it

Quote from: paul panetta
tigers about to be embarrassed in round 1
https://twitter.com/davidking34/status/1624226666859106317

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1126 on: February 12, 2023, 07:29:49 PM »
Quote from: Daniel
I doubt the tigers will finish in the 8 this season.
Quote from: WayneMcInerney
Talk me through richmond optimism? They've been awful for 2 years and all their best players (minus Bolton) are well last there best footy #headscratcher
https://twitter.com/kanecornes/status/1624603630589607937

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1127 on: February 13, 2023, 03:01:49 AM »
Quote from: Trav 20
But Martin has never had 30 disposals in a final. He's just played that little bit better than his teammates in a few grand finals. A great feat no doubt, but he also happened to be the best player in a team that wasn't chock full of stars, so not completely out of the odds (I know you like those).

It brings me back to the eye test. We marvel at the feats of the greatest who've ever played. High marks, long kicks, skill, speed, toughness and a host of other elements separate the greats from mere mortals. How could the greatest player of all time not be capable of marking on other people's shoulders ? But but goal assists. LOL
Quote from: Trav 20
Richmond fans don't seem to get that Martin isn't physically capable of doing a quarter of the things SNR did for fun.

When I say I've seen heaps of players better than Martin it's never more evident than in a video like this.

Martin is a great player who's had a profound influence on many of the most important games ''he's'' played in, but when it comes to individual feats on a footy field he's nowhere near some of the greats of our game.

Waddling around and kicking some great timely goals in grand finals doesn't suddenly mean you're the greatest player who's laced a boot.
Quote from: Trav 20
The best players in history have been either the competition's best ''coalface'' midfielders or key forwards.

Martin is neither.

Does his body of work in finals elevate him above the best key forwars or mids ? Not even close.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/if-dustin-martin-wins-a-4th-norm-smith-medal-and-premiership-will-he-be-regarded-as-the-greatest-player-of-all-time.1341391/page-176

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1128 on: February 13, 2023, 11:28:20 AM »
Non Richmond supporters will not have watched every Richmond game so cannot be certain of Martin's influence, week in week out, in home and away games.

Every Richmond supporter knows how good Martin is and it is a pleasure to have watched him weave his magic...usually right when we need his magic

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1129 on: February 13, 2023, 01:32:51 PM »
Quote from: SEN
GREATEST TEAM OF THE 21ST CENTURY!

Starting this Tuesday, we will begin a 32-team bracket to crown the best AFL team since 2000!

You'll be able to vote here on Twitter & on our Insta stories.

Check out the bracket below. Stay tuned!



Quote from: leeroylatham
Certainly won't be any of the Richmond sides lol...weakest premiership teams ever

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1130 on: February 15, 2023, 07:41:38 PM »


Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
WHY IS PORT LOSING THIS VOTE

Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
I'll just leave this here


https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1625626077933731848

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1131 on: February 15, 2023, 11:18:08 PM »
Oh wow they had a higher %  :clapping

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9973
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1132 on: February 16, 2023, 10:07:28 AM »
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1133 on: February 16, 2023, 10:41:28 AM »
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...

Oh man didn’t even see it was their 02 side, thought it was their 04 side. Why are they even comparing non premiers with premiers? Port finish 3rd, 1st and 1st from 01-03 and their finals record during that time was 2-6 - there’s a reason they were known as chokers until they finally broke through in 04 against a Brisbane side that had to play a home prelim final at the MCG for some reason.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9973
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1134 on: February 16, 2023, 02:37:41 PM »
They got belted in a prelim lol

Similar season to us in 2018 really. You don't see us bragging about that season...

Oh man didn’t even see it was their 02 side, thought it was their 04 side. Why are they even comparing non premiers with premiers? Port finish 3rd, 1st and 1st from 01-03 and their finals record during that time was 2-6 - there’s a reason they were known as chokers until they finally broke through in 04 against a Brisbane side that had to play a home prelim final at the MCG for some reason.

Yep and they were going for their 4th straight so were probably tired, beat up, less fire in the guts.

2002 pffft nobody remembers minor premierships.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1135 on: February 18, 2023, 07:57:29 PM »
Quote from: HeraldSun
Dustin Martin is the best AFL player of this century writes Mark Robinson - do you agree?

Quote from: Freo ⚓ Pope
*impact in grand finals. He's been average to poor in five wk 1 finals and was not fully fit in the prelim final loss to Mason Cox.
Quote from: Matt
Martin had a great 3-4 years but has been mostly inconsistent outside of that.
Quote from: Kris D
Would he be as good if the umpires paid free kicks against him every time he fends someone off by making contact with their neck/face/head?
Quote from: major tom
Quote from: TigerKing
Hard to beat 3 norm smiths… the best player in the biggest games!
Only 1 truly deserved
https://twitter.com/heraldsunsport/status/1626669355273715714

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1136 on: February 20, 2023, 06:47:41 PM »
Quote from: SEN1116
THE GREATEST AFL TEAM SINCE 2000 TOURNAMENT!

Round 1 Match-Up:
Port Adelaide (2004) versus Richmond (2020)

Who advances to the second round?

Quote from: Joel Greer
Port easily here. It was a proper season after all.
Quote from: JayFry
Hubs don’t count.
Quote from: Port Adelaide Fan Forever
PORT BEAT ONE OF THE BEST DYSTANSTY TEAMS IN HISTORY IN 2004 PORT SHOULD BE WINNING RICHMOND HARDLY WON THE PREMIERSHIP IN 2020
Quote from: Adam Spurling
More a popularity contest than anything. Port 04 poos all over Richmond 2020
https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1627429772333809664

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9973
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1137 on: February 21, 2023, 01:02:47 AM »
Really?

I reckon Port wasn't a great team in 04.

They beat a dynasty team running out of puff for sure.

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1138 on: February 21, 2023, 09:21:14 AM »
Really?

I reckon Port wasn't a great team in 04.

They beat a dynasty team running out of puff for sure.

They had a player by the name of Hardwick who was destined for greatness. So they have a link to greatness.....sure a tenuous link but a link all the same

You know it makes sense

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #1139 on: February 21, 2023, 02:59:40 PM »
2nd round match-ups for anyone who cares.


https://twitter.com/1116sen/status/1627785982132232200