Author Topic: Tom Lynch referred directly to the Tribunal [merged]  (Read 649001 times)

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14224
Re: Tom Lynch referred directly to the Tribunal [merged]
« Reply #2595 on: Yesterday at 09:43:50 PM »
Did Tex get reported? Hit Hugo in the back, difference is Hugo didn't flop...
Here's the vision of that incident.

https://x.com/mallen101/status/1939497990777160181
That's actually quite bad!  Tex throws a coward punch from behind at Hugo's head & not a mention anywhere?   It wasn't severe, but it was unexpected & enough to knock Hugo's head forward ... and yet ... *crickets ...   

Looked like a slap to the back of the head. Should be a free kick or fine IMO. Maybe a week if we're being harsh.

Lynch will get weeks because the reality is that he's lucky he didn't connect better. The crow idiot laughed about it on the ground and got up but ultimately Lynch took a fair dinkum swing at his head.

I'm actually OK with the league applying 'potential for harm's here, just wish they'd do it consistently.

I think it's 3 minimum, probably 4, 5 max/bit harsh. No way it's more than 5.

its never consistent so its not even a valid point.

what is the way this has always been adjudicated? If no harm done then sentence is less. well wtf did this guy do then? He got up and walked off.

its an absolute joke is what it is.

should be 2 max but he will get 5 IMO.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3844
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Tom Lynch referred directly to the Tribunal [merged]
« Reply #2596 on: Today at 01:49:35 AM »
And Tom Stewart got nothing….

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10667
Re: Tom Lynch referred directly to the Tribunal [merged]
« Reply #2597 on: Today at 10:25:45 AM »
Did Tex get reported? Hit Hugo in the back, difference is Hugo didn't flop...
Here's the vision of that incident.

https://x.com/mallen101/status/1939497990777160181
That's actually quite bad!  Tex throws a coward punch from behind at Hugo's head & not a mention anywhere?   It wasn't severe, but it was unexpected & enough to knock Hugo's head forward ... and yet ... *crickets ...   

Looked like a slap to the back of the head. Should be a free kick or fine IMO. Maybe a week if we're being harsh.

Lynch will get weeks because the reality is that he's lucky he didn't connect better. The crow idiot laughed about it on the ground and got up but ultimately Lynch took a fair dinkum swing at his head.

I'm actually OK with the league applying 'potential for harm's here, just wish they'd do it consistently.

I think it's 3 minimum, probably 4, 5 max/bit harsh. No way it's more than 5.

its never consistent so its not even a valid point.

what is the way this has always been adjudicated? If no harm done then sentence is less. well wtf did this guy do then? He got up and walked off.

its an absolute joke is what it is.

should be 2 max but he will get 5 IMO.

It's a very valid point.

It either needs to be applied consistently or never.

I'm happy either way as long as everyone plays by the same rules.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13329
Re: Tom Lynch referred directly to the Tribunal [merged]
« Reply #2598 on: Today at 02:50:55 PM »
We havent been under the same umpire of tribunal rules for years now