Author Topic: Shane Tuck [merged]  (Read 68702 times)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #630 on: August 20, 2011, 10:47:07 PM »
Who has proven that they can take us forward to a flag??? Ben Nason?

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #631 on: August 21, 2011, 08:40:38 AM »
nearly time to go see the messiah Tucky  ;D

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #632 on: August 21, 2011, 09:42:43 AM »
I reckon Nason was being given time to develop this year, he can play, as he proved in his first year with us, which was a pretty good effort considering where he came from.  He also needed to put on some muscle which takes time and is, harder again when you do so much running.  Maybe he will reappear like some of our other players, next year and surprise us all.
Lots of people name their swords......

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #633 on: August 21, 2011, 09:45:51 AM »
I reckon Nason was being given time to develop this year, he can play, as he proved in his first year with us, which was a pretty good effort considering where he came from.  He also needed to put on some muscle which takes time and is, harder again when you do so much running.  Maybe he will reappear like some of our other players, next year and surprise us all.

Maybe Nason will surprise himself ::)

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #634 on: August 21, 2011, 09:47:40 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.
Lots of people name their swords......

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #635 on: August 21, 2011, 09:49:01 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.

although one year doesnt make a career, been very poor this year, very poor

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #636 on: August 21, 2011, 09:52:52 AM »
yes but he has only played a few games this year.  I suspected he had been kept aside like a few other players had, to work on things, like Tucky and Kingy.  Just my thought on it.  Could be he has cracked it or become homesick, or just not working hard enough as well I realise.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41250
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #637 on: August 21, 2011, 09:53:10 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.

although one year doesnt make a career, been very poor this year, very poor

You said Rance wouldn't make it and you've admitted he's now looking good - so you are correct in saying one year doens't make a career

I reckon Nason hasn't really been given a proper go this year along with a few others
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #638 on: August 21, 2011, 10:00:04 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.

although one year doesnt make a career, been very poor this year, very poor

Absolutely correct Jackie, on year does not make a career, yet you write players off after one game, perhaps even before a game is played in dea's case.

Go figure!
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #639 on: August 21, 2011, 10:01:29 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.

although one year doesnt make a career, been very poor this year, very poor

Absolutely correct Jackie, on year does not make a career, yet you write players off after one game, perhaps even before a game is played in dea's case.

Go figure!

as this is at elite level. not beginners, go and figure will you

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #640 on: August 21, 2011, 10:02:29 AM »
also, why would anyone recruit someone after 3 TAC games, thats why we are the worst performing Melbourne Club

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #641 on: August 21, 2011, 10:05:32 AM »
Well yeah, even I started to think poor old Rance was for the chop, and he turned that round magnificently.  My point was that, the coaching and development crew are doing major surgery with some of our players rather than just a one or two week patch up in the magoos.  And some of them have come back like new men.  In fact, at one stage I thought Kingy and Nahas were goners too, I loved both of their efforts but I thought they were not quite there and now they would be two names I would have every week without a blink.  Whomever is doing the reprogramming in the background is a stuffing genius, make sure they are on a solid contract!  :bow
Lots of people name their swords......

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #642 on: August 21, 2011, 10:13:22 AM »
wouldnt think jake king is a certainity, dont get too carried away.. played 2 good quarters last week after 6 poor games
Rance has improved heaps in last month, credit where its due.
As a group, i dont think there has been much improvement if any, several players have gone backwards or have had NO improvment what  so ever, where you have improvement in some players, others havent .  eg Nason, Post.McGaune, Graham, Farmer, Jackson, Edwards,Thursfield, Browne,Goudis,Hicks, Webberley, Hislop,O.Reilly, Contin, ( 15 players )
So Rance has improved, tick there

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #643 on: August 21, 2011, 10:18:49 AM »
You don't think he played some good football last year Jack?  Honest question.  I thought he was quite good given his size and that he was a 1st year player from the boonies.

although one year doesnt make a career, been very poor this year, very poor

Absolutely correct Jackie, on year does not make a career, yet you write players off after one game, perhaps even before a game is played in dea's case.

Go figure!

as this is at elite level. not beginners, go and figure will you

you'd make politician no doubt jacko.

your deflections remind me of of wonder woman.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqN6uaLCn8c
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Shane Tuck [merged]
« Reply #644 on: August 21, 2011, 10:20:50 AM »
wonder woman, what a honey ;) ;) ;) ;) :birthday