Author Topic: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020  (Read 19148 times)

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #90 on: March 17, 2020, 04:51:38 PM »
So what if the AFL makes sure all players and club officials under 50 contract the virus in one hit/at same time and have a 5/6 week delay then start the season?

Only works if once you get it you are immune from re-infection

Haha, the rate of infection is 2-3 people per case, so by voluntarily infecting close to 1,000 people you would be more or less directly causing the deaths of 10-50 people!

Not so. Young fit people without any of the pre illness conditions are reportedly likely not to have much of a concern.

Older people over 70 and with existing illnesses make up the bulk of deaths. Death rate in this group is over 20%.

But if you can be re-infected it is not an option.

England is going about this in a completely different way. They have quarantined all older people and are willing to let the virus work its way through the younger population.

Time will tell if they are right

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #91 on: March 17, 2020, 05:24:37 PM »
Tomorrow is the day,. Round one no chance.  If that happens you can kiss the first 4-6 weeks goodbye. 

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9938
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #92 on: March 17, 2020, 06:47:46 PM »
So what if the AFL makes sure all players and club officials under 50 contract the virus in one hit/at same time and have a 5/6 week delay then start the season?

Only works if once you get it you are immune from re-infection

Haha, the rate of infection is 2-3 people per case, so by voluntarily infecting close to 1,000 people you would be more or less directly causing the deaths of 10-50 people!

Not so. Young fit people without any of the pre illness conditions are reportedly likely not to have much of a concern.

Older people over 70 and with existing illnesses make up the bulk of deaths. Death rate in this group is over 20%.

But if you can be re-infected it is not an option.

England is going about this in a completely different way. They have quarantined all older people and are willing to let the virus work its way through the younger population.

Time will tell if they are right

If the infection rate is 2-3 people per case, and you are intentionally infection up to 1,000 young males, then they will infect a further 2-3,000 people in general - which will result in probably 50-odd deaths most of which will likely be older people.

Fwiw I am basically on the front line as a nurse unit manager in a hospital run by the largest health provider in the state!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #93 on: March 17, 2020, 06:51:33 PM »
The feds may decide what happens next for the AFL. Talk of reducing mass gatherings further to <100.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #94 on: March 18, 2020, 02:22:17 AM »
The AFL will wait until Wednesday to make a decision on whether round one goes ahead as planned amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding the coronavirus crisis, as the players push for a full home-and-away campaign of 22 matches per club.

"The players want to play, the players will do everything they can," Mr Marsh said.

"They still have optimism of a 22-game season here.

"We've got a 40-week window and players will make sacrifices around scheduling and leave, and everything else to try to give the industry a chance of surviving this or getting through this."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-17/coronavirus-afl-delays-decision-on-season-opener/12063152

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9938
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #95 on: March 18, 2020, 07:01:00 AM »
Won't/shouldn't happen.

They should push the season back 2 months and cut to 17 rounds with no bye - try to finish things up in Oct/Nov instead of Sept. But even that would be optimistic IMO.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14029
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #96 on: March 18, 2020, 08:31:44 AM »
why shouldnt it happen? Bizarre comment

36 blokes running around vrs gatherings of 100/500 what is the difference. Either they do it properly or stfu and let them play



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9938
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #97 on: March 18, 2020, 08:50:48 AM »
why shouldnt it happen? Bizarre comment

36 blokes running around vrs gatherings of 100/500 what is the difference. Either they do it properly or stfu and let them play


Exactly. Do it properly > lockdown.

I want my footy season as much as anyone but pushing to continue at the moment is absurd, and from the AFL + player's perspective is 100% driven by money.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14029
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #98 on: March 18, 2020, 09:02:22 AM »
all for the lockdown, to end this charade, but as it stands right now there isnt one so why not play on.

I find it quite funny that we are trying to lock down this and lock down that and on saturday i was a bar with 300 people in it.

Italy are a good example of what not to do and thats just delay the inevitable, but trying to plug holes. Go hard lock us up or shut the stuff up

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #99 on: March 18, 2020, 09:34:56 AM »
No change to <500 ppl rule for outdoor gatherings.

<100 ppl rule for non-essential indoor gatherings now introduced by the Feds.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #100 on: March 18, 2020, 09:43:05 AM »
ps. Feds now saying they expect this will most likely last for at least 6 months.

 

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #101 on: March 18, 2020, 09:48:23 AM »
Government going to leave the decision to play matches to the AFL.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #102 on: March 18, 2020, 11:23:58 AM »
3aw saying there will be decision at midday.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98007
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #103 on: March 18, 2020, 12:09:15 PM »
Paul Marsh said round 1 is unlikely to go ahead based on the PM's announcements today.

source: 3aw/nine news at noon.

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG, Round 1, 2020
« Reply #104 on: March 18, 2020, 12:16:00 PM »
I'd be surprised if the season started in the next few months