Author Topic: Thomson Dow [merged]  (Read 91797 times)

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19854
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Thomson Dow [merged]
« Reply #465 on: May 12, 2025, 09:04:22 PM »
He hasn’t been afl standard on a consistent basis and I worry that sometimes he’s a bit conditional with his effort but the reality is that his standard is about where we are at.
I don’t think there’s anyone who is leaping frogging him for his spot just yet.
Kmac 2 is still working it out, Sonsie isn’t good enough and we need to see a hell of a lot more of Smillie before he gets a go in the midfield
I think if Sonsie as given a fair go in the middle to see where he is at that would be good.

HRT how have you determined Sonise isn’t good enough? Dominates the midfield VFL level more then dow does and hasn’t got 5% of the opportunity at AFL that Dow has been afforded. I’m not even going to disagree with you about it but I’m not sure how you can give dow a pass while definitively stating Sonsie isn’t at the level.

Had Sonsie been given the same amount of chances he'd be giving us way more than what Dow's serving up - because he wouldn't even need to be that great to do so. There's blokes we've delisted and who deserved to be delisted that would be producing more than Dow right now if they were given his opportunities. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8389
Re: Thomson Dow [merged]
« Reply #466 on: May 12, 2025, 11:53:55 PM »
Sonsie’s numbers this year are significantly worse this year than his first year. It’s possible he could be playing in Dow’s place more regularly but it is more probable than not that he would be delivering not much more than Dow is.
He’s had a few chances now and only a year younger than Dow, he’s played 28 games to Dow’s 43 games so the delta in games played isn’t that great.
Last year both played similar games (dow 17 and sonsie 14) and Sonsie had as many turnovers per game, lower DE, tackles, score involvements and was murdered on contested ball.
You might argument Sonsie was played out of position but I would say he just needs to impact where he plays.

Neither will nor should be in our next finals team so to me the debate lacks purpose.

Both should be overtaken by Smillie by years end. It’s clear that last year’s draft crop are being prioritised which is the most telling selection policy
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10519
Re: Thomson Dow [merged]
« Reply #467 on: May 13, 2025, 06:33:22 AM »
Sonsie’s numbers this year are significantly worse this year than his first year. It’s possible he could be playing in Dow’s place more regularly but it is more probable than not that he would be delivering not much more than Dow is.
He’s had a few chances now and only a year younger than Dow, he’s played 28 games to Dow’s 43 games so the delta in games played isn’t that great.
Last year both played similar games (dow 17 and sonsie 14) and Sonsie had as many turnovers per game, lower DE, tackles, score involvements and was murdered on contested ball.
You might argument Sonsie was played out of position but I would say he just needs to impact where he plays.

Neither will nor should be in our next finals team so to me the debate lacks purpose.

Both should be overtaken by Smillie by years end. It’s clear that last year’s draft crop are being prioritised which is the most telling selection policy

I'd make the position argument as well as TOG.

Sonsie often the sub.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8389
Re: Thomson Dow [merged]
« Reply #468 on: May 13, 2025, 04:50:08 PM »
Only one game in 2024 was under 50% game time and 11 were 65% game time or more.
Doubt there was too much subbing going on there.
Neither of them are genuine regulars in a finals quality team
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”