Author Topic: State of Umpiring [merged]  (Read 505704 times)

Offline Thrasher97

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #3225 on: May 26, 2025, 10:21:54 AM »
The ruck nomination rule, is a farce, it should be simple, if they don't want third man up, then penalise the offending team... Why make it so complicated!!!

Online Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19836
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #3226 on: May 26, 2025, 02:51:36 PM »
The ruck nomination rule, is a farce, it should be simple, if they don't want third man up, then penalise the offending team... Why make it so complicated!!!

The problem there is what if both sides do it? Mind you, never saw the big issue with third man up anyway - created more congestion & repeat stoppages I think was the main argument against it. Has the rule change really rectified it that much? Just another "solution"  to an imaginary problem that caused a real problem and makes the game look like an amateur playground sport. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 99714
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: State of Umpiring [merged]
« Reply #3227 on: May 27, 2025, 12:12:29 AM »
Have you noticed the short boundary throw ins this year?

VIDEO: https://x.com/7AFL/status/1926479728325558635