Author Topic: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)  (Read 2316 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Financial powerhouse clubs take $8 million hit from AFL

Jake Niall
The Age
December 10, 2021 — 3.30pm


Financially powerful clubs Collingwood, Richmond, Hawthorn and West Coast will receive only the guaranteed minimum of $8 million per club in 2022, a reduction of $2 million on this year’s allocation, under the AFL’s new funding model.

In adopting a new funding model that reduced the “base” amount for clubs from $10 million to
$8 million, the AFL has singled out those four wealthy clubs to lose all the $2 million per club that the league has put in a pot for redistribution.

Under the new “variable” funding model, industry sources said Essendon were expected to receive up to half - $1 million or so - of their lost $2 million for a total package approaching $9 million, and are in the next band of relatively prosperous clubs who do not get the full $2 million back, while Carlton - a club with the capacity to be a financial heavyweight - expect to be funded to the tune of around $10 million, essentially getting back most or all of the $2 million every club initially loses.

Under the redistribution, expansion clubs Greater Western Sydney and Gold Coast are set to be given a larger share of the allocation to the 18 clubs, compared to 2021 - a measure of the AFL’s investment in those clubs and the time it will take for them to become independent.

The expansion teams have consistently been funded to the tune of more than $20 million, covering their player payments and most of the soft cap, over the past several years, except for the COVID-curtailed 2020, when AFL revenue shrank.

Of the $36 million the AFL has taken from all clubs, more than $26 million will be re-allocated to 14 of the 18 clubs, on a needs basis - a move that has already drawn the ire of Richmond, Collingwood, Hawthorn, the Eagles and Essendon.

The loss of $2 million each to the first four of those four clubs means that, in effect, as one source from a wealthy club pointed out, there will be a gap exceeding $6 million each year between what the AFL provides to the richer clubs and the total player payments (TPP). In the past, the AFL fully funded the player payments.

The AFL will retain between $8 million and $10 million from that $36 million pot, which will be re-directed to clubs that have special needs during 2022 - a plan that is mindful of the unequal and unpredictable impact of the pandemic upon clubs in different states.

The AFL view is that the greatly reduced football department costs (the soft cap is still more than $3 million below the 2019 total of $9.7 million) means the rich clubs have been more profitable in 2021 and can afford the funding cuts.

North Melbourne and Sydney are slated to have their funding slightly increased in 2022.

But most AFL clubs will receive a little less in the first instance. Grand finalists Melbourne and the Western Bulldogs are set to have their overall funding reduced - both clubs having stronger balance sheets than ever before, having enjoyed on-field success and sold their pokie venues for excellent prices, the Demons selling the Bentleigh Club for $23.7 million this year.

St Kilda, which has been easily the greatest recipient of AFL funding of Victorian clubs over the previous four years - topping $20 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019 - will also have their funding reduced compared to the already reduced 2021 outlay. The Saints have, however, cut their debt, which had topped $12 million at one stage.

The Brisbane Lions, who have recovered strongly from a fiscally fraught position and made a profit to $3 million this year, are expected to receive about the same as they did in 2021.

The Swans offer an example of how the pandemic hits clubs differently, depending on whether games are played in their state before crowds. They lost $6.1 million in 2020 due to the COVID-19’s impact on their largely crowd-free home games, but have fared far better to record a small profit this year.

The AFL has shed about $700 million in revenue over the course of the pandemic in 2020 and 2021, forcing major cost cuttings and wiping out their cash reserves and future fund but avoiding any debt.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/financial-powerhouse-clubs-take-8-million-hit-from-afl-20211209-p59g85.html

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Its time for a super league with the leagues  top 12 clubs in the competition.

Offline crackertiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 765
  • For We're From Tigerland
Time for Gillon to go.....

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3746
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Surely it’s right to reward clubs who fail…. :lol :lol

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Benny Gale's response on twitter:

Quote from: Brendon Gale
The best sporting competitions in the world including the @AFL feature high levels of competitive balance. We’ll work harder and smarter,  and we’ll need our @Richmond_FC Tiger Army more than ever to maintain our hard earned strength & independence.
https://twitter.com/brendongale25/status/1469473156146499586

Offline Buddysucks

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1070
  • For We're From Tigerland
Before handing over extra funding, does the AFL set strict targets in order to obtain the additional funding?


Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40316
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Before handing over extra funding, does the AFL set strict targets in order to obtain the additional funding?

They used too, not sure they do anymore
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Rampsation

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Its just a disgrace it really is.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
The great socialist dictatorship at it again , it used to be managed  always for the public / supporters, that’s is not the case any more

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Don't water the rocks
The great socialist dictatorship at it again , it used to be managed  always for the public / supporters, that’s is not the case any more


Is Dictator Dan in charge?
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2021, 08:36:02 AM »
Lol
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98247
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2021, 12:06:15 PM »
This must be where the money is going to.

AFL commits a further $8m to help community football bounce back

https://www.afl.com.au/news/692068/afl-commits-a-further-8m-to-community-football-bounce-back

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40316
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2021, 07:56:42 PM »
And folks wonder why I reckon the AFL won't kick in a cent towards our redevelopment
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9980
Re: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2021, 10:58:55 PM »
And folks wonder why I reckon the AFL won't kick in a cent towards our redevelopment

Nekminit the AFL will announce a $1mil contribution and gloat about how wonderful they are.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40316
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Financial powerhouse clubs like Richmond take $8 million hit from AFL (Age)
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2021, 08:31:07 AM »
And folks wonder why I reckon the AFL won't kick in a cent towards our redevelopment

Nekminit the AFL will announce a $1mil contribution and gloat about how wonderful they are.

Fair call
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)